I love that churches are thinking this way. It also tells me that we can do this for women in conservative spaces whose primary ministries often function (of necessity) outside the gathered church.
1) Immanuel is not hiring Dr. Moore as a pastor/elder. 2) They are providing him a space & support to do a work that is directed outward, recognizing that it benefits the church universal.
So many women in conservative spaces are caught in the gears of local church polity & their call to ministry. Most are not interested in being named elders or pastors. They just want to do the work the Holy Spirit has gifted & called them to do.
Unfortunately, they often have to do this work w/out the support or recognition of their own churches. They minister in isolation & at best, end up forming their own support structure & at worst, foregoing it altogether.
What women in these spaces need is simply the recognition & support for the work that God has called them to do. Churches need to provide this if only at a basic level.
It can be as simple as a quiet space to study, admin support, or basic acknowledgment of the work they're doing more broadly. It does not mean controlling or policing their work so much as partnering with them.
I'm glad that Immanuel has recognized the need to extend this kind of support & recognition to Dr. Moore in an official way. I'd love to see more churches doing this for others who are also serving the church more broadly.
Because in the absence of church communities, such ministries will inevitably be shaped & shepherded by publishers, the marketplace & social media.
So, if you're leading a church & people in your congregation are acting in ministry or parachurch capacities, please find ways to support & acknowledge the work they've been called to, especially those who are working in isolation.
You are not bringing them into your org chart so much as recognizing that they are already there and that the Holy Spirit is already at work in & through them.
The key here is "in residence." Their work is not directed toward your local church, but it emerges from within your congregation. As a congregation, you are simply providing the hospitality & honor due those whose ministries orignate from among you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's true that there are a lot of faithful people in the SBC who love Jesus & just want to love their neighbors well. It's also true that corrupt leaders can scuttle their efforts. If you love the people in the pew, you'll stand against those who use them for their own power.
It doesn't matter whether or not the people in the pew know the names of the top leaders in the SBC. There's a whole swath of mid-level leaders who do, who stand between the most powerful & grass roots. What they choose to do makes all the difference to people in the pew.
As a baptist pastor's wife for most of my adult life, I've lived through multiple microcosms of what's playing out right now in the SBC. No, it was never a struggle over millions of $ & millions of congregants, but the dynamics were the same.
For those following evangelical gender debates can I suggest that there are (at least) 2 streams of conservativism:
1)Those who believe authority stems from maleness.
2)Those who believe certain roles necessitate embodied maleness & authority stems from the role not the body.
I do not have sufficient words to tell you how significant these differences are. And I have a lot of words.
ISTM that this is the real watershed & predicts everything downstream. It also explains why some complementarians find greater affinity w/ patriarchy while some find more partnership w/ egalitarians.
Per previous thread about motherhood, work, & society:
You may rightly respond that fatherhood is also difficult & that men must make choices btwn work & family, too. I don't doubt this. The Q is about shape of society: does it support male embodiment or female embodiment?
Obviously, we are limited beings & we cannot do two things at once. Choice is inherent in this limitation. The Q is the difference btwn inherent choices & manufactured choices. To what degree does our society create *extra* conflict for women beyond that inherent in limitation?
To what degree does the shape of our society accomodate & support the inherent choices of male bodies while adding burden to the inherent choices of female bodies?
The reactions to this piece from @ebruenig are something else. I also became a mother at 25 & while there have been many struggles along the way, I've never once thought they were the result of my children or my own fertility.
Given the nature of our work, our family often moves simultaneously in working class & professional class spaces. In the latter, I'm always among the youngest mothers. But in the former, my peers have adult children & may be grandmothers.
Don't underestimate how much of the rage at @ebruenig's piece is about class & economics & the failure to follow "the success sequence" which demands that you establish your career before having children.
Those conservatives who are truly, convictionally, exegetically conservative irt to gender (& aren't just using the label for cover) are those who make every possible effort to hear women's voices & enable women's giftedness for the sake of the Kingdom.
Those who go out of their way to do the opposite are... something else.
At some point, labels & claims are meaningless. Instead, show me your actions. Show me how you have honored the Holy Spirit's work in & thru *all* God's sons & daughters. Show me how you've removed barriers & equipped them to run fast toward the work He's calling them to.
Biological motherhood within the church =/= spiritual motherhood of & for the church.
Both are beautiful. Both are lifegiving. Both call us into a greater reality for purposes beyond our own self-fulfillment. But one cannot replace the other. And they are not necessarily dependent on each other.
A woman may be called to one or both & will exercise her calling out of deeper resources of faithfulness, service, & love for God & others. But while similar modes of being, biological motherhood & spiritual motherhood are distinct & cannot replace each other.