1. Extremely disturbed to see the outcome of the latest violent attack against conservative journalist and pundit Andy Ngo but also disturbed to see all the people encouraging his continued thrill-seeking behavior.
2. I hope Ngo didn’t sustain permanent damage from the May 28th attack and it would be nice to think that his assailants will all be arrested and brought to justice but per his thread so far only one arrest has been made.
3. As I noted after the June 2019 attack against Ngo, this attack was predictable.
11. Ngo mixes facts with conjecture and sometimes falsehoods to paint a vivid caricature of individuals involved in far left protests and riots.
12. I haven’t seen him paint a complete portrait of any of the individuals he's covered in recent years. The narrative is a one-sided tale of antifa run amok as a grave danger to democracy that the Democrats are ignoring.
13. Mainstream and progressive media have not done a good job of covering far left protests and unrest but conservative independent conflict journalists don’t offer balanced nuanced reporting. Many of them produce outrage porn.
14. When you’re outraged, curiosity becomes impossible. Common ground cannot be found.
15. The lack of arrests in the attack against Ngo in 2019 is a failure of the Portland Police Bureau but this conflict exists because both sides perpetuate it and it has taken on a life of its own.
16. I will point out the hypocrisy of a movement obsessed with the dangers of “white supremacy” violently attacking a Vietnamese American man instead.
17. But it’s consistent with their framework. Ngo has been stripped of the mythical group protections that some on the left believe come with being a man of color.
19. Some people joke that Asians are white now but we know that’s not true in America.
20. We don’t fit in to the American white-black binary but continue to be used by some people in both racial groups to bash the other group all while we continue to be subjected to violence and hate crimes by both white and black assailants.
22. I wrote in 2018 that Ngo may had reached a level of notoriety where it was no longer safe for him to cover protests without being recognized and becoming part of the story.
23. Note the folks encouraging Ngo to continue his work, calling it “brave”, “heroic”, and “important” while few of them are also willing to risk their safety to do the same.
24. I saw a tweet from a white conservative journalist telling someone she couldn’t do this type of reporting because she has a child & the risk isn’t worth it.
How important is this story if conservative media are unwilling to spend resources to put their reporters out there?
25. Conflict reporting of unrest in the US is entertainment and they’re willing to sacrifice Ngo for clicks and ratings if need be, while most journalists stay home.
Ngo seems willing to pursue this story to his death.
26. Encouraging someone who suffered a brain hemorrhage to continue to go out and engage in the behavior that got him the brain injury is madness.
Real friends would tell him that his health and his life are not worth this story.
Per Willamette Week, the one person arrested the night of the attack against Ngo was arrested on unrelated charges per the probable cause affidavit which I’m unable to access.
30. The Daily Dot reported that the man claims to have audio of PPB officers making up the charges against him but they weren’t able to verify if the people in the audio were PPB officers.
I’ve been doing a mix of adding to this thread I started earlier today and retweeting tweets. The earlier thread was meant to be a 2nd update thread so I don’t want to clutter it with news about the unrest tonight.
2. Earlier today the city of Minneapolis began to try to reoopen George Floyd Square, the intersection of 38th St. and Chicago Ave. where George Floyd was killed by an MPD police officer last year.
1. When I wrote about something controversial and say things that other people aren’t saying, the most common response I get is “You missed the most important thing! Why aren’t you saying what everyone else is saying?!?”
Uhh, because the point is that I’m not interested ...
2. … in saying what everyone else is saying? 🤷🏻♀️
I don’t need to be the 5,421st person saying that violent people shouldn’t be allowed to silence journalists. If you need to read that take to reaffirm yourself, you can read someone else’s tweets.
3. Chasing a story to what you believe to be your eventual death is not something that the public should expect of any journalist or content creator. I didn’t see anyone saying this last night so I decided to.
1. The people who are misreading my Naomi Osaka thread and putting words in my mouth or assuming I don’t have any standing to speak about anything Osaka-related because I admitted to not following tennis/sports are revealing more about themselves than me.
3. Some people aren’t able to fathom what you’re talking about because it’s filtered through their own bias and they assume that because you sound like you’re saying X that you are uninformed, stupid, and lazy.
1. I just listened to a maddening interview with a white journalist who seemed to be advocating for different rules for women of color because we have a harder time than white people and should therefore be treated differently. 🤯
2. I understand that there are some women/people of color pushing this idea that we need to be treated with kid gloves because it’s exhausting to talk to people different from ourselves but come on, we don’t all think this way! 🤨
3. I don’t need/want white women speaking for me. I can speak for myself.
"as a group, the dogs being trained in Thailand — Angel, Bobby, Bravo and three others, Apollo, Tiger and Nasa — accurately detected the virus 96.2 percent of the time in controlled settings, according to university researchers."
3. Dogs are faster than PCR testing.
"An intake of air through their sensitive snouts is enough to identify within a second the volatile organic compound or cocktail of compounds that are produced when a person with Covid-19 sheds damaged cells, researchers say."