Napier Barracks was deliberate. Immigration Ministers deliberately created a shortage of dispersal accomm during the pandemic, then used that as an excuse for urgently placing people in a barracks. Without safeguards.
In March 2020, senior civil servants urged Ministers to use the pandemic to drop their policy of allowing local authorities to veto placing asylum-seekers in empty flats and houses.
Ministers didn’t accept that advice. +
Instead, Ministers used their powers to create new temporary accommodation sites - regardless of local authority wishes.
Suitable for stays of days at most, asylum-seekers were forced to stay for months. +
If Ministers were willing to ignore local authorities opposed to barracks, why do they allow LAs a veto over empty flats - and pretend they “can’t” find flats?
One explanation is that Ministers prefer crisis and dangerous accommodation.
But I’m open to other explanations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 million people just left the UK. And it wasn’t because they care about vERy HiGh iMMigrATion.
There’s no data linking relative high levels of immigration to worsening housing. House building in recent decades in UK (and many other places) depended on immigrant labour.
Housing, green space, public services are determined primarily by Gov regulation and spending. Levels of immigration are irrelevant. Compare high immigration Luxembourg, Switzerland & Netherlands with low immigration Greece, Portugal and Croatia…
In Sept 2020, Home Office Ministers started to evict 000s of former asylum-streets to destitution - on to streets or sofa-surf at the height of the pandemic.
For 7 months @gmlawcentre & @dpg_law fought back thru the courts blocking all evictions.
In October 2020, working with @_A_S_A_P, @gmlawcentre persuaded the Principal Judge of the Asylum Support Tribunal these evictions threaten everyone’s public health - winning a “landmark” decision that all judges have followed since. +
When the Home Office refused to back down, @gmlawcentre brought a High Court judicial review of the evictions, asking the court to urgently block evictions of destitute people. +
“He called Phillips a “virtue signalling rape facilitator”, “abusing her authority and privilege to shut him down like so many British heroes” with “extreme racist language, aimed predominantly towards those from an Asian or Muslim background.” +
This dangerous, entitled, fury wasn’t his invention. He took it from mass circulation newspapers and credible authority figures signalling that British heroes like Tommy were speaking truth. +
Short thread on the risk of subversion of the Rules-based order in the field of JR.
A few years back, the judges who sit in England & Wales Administrative Court decided it would be helpful if there were an Administrative Court User Guide. Here's the current version: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
+
The Administrative Court User Guide is *A Good Thing* It explains in narrative form much about how the Admin Court works, bringing together references to the Rules, Practice Directions and caselaw. The President of the QBD is right to 'encourage the study of it' (Foreword) +