1/ Report on #telehealth from GAO has reasonable methods but draws the wrong, negatively skewed conclusion toward telehealth reimbursement that compromises health equity. Below is an elaboration why...gao.gov/assets/gao-21-…
2/ First, the researchers methods are reasonable. They primarily rely on CMS reports, which have limited utility given lack of granularity of those data, especially around disparities. But the researchers did supplement with interviews with providers, consumers, state leaders.
3/ Report appropriately finds that Medicare telehealth waivers resulted in increased utilization of telehealth services & provided beneficiaries access to services that would not have otherwise been available during the early days of the #COVID19. That was the point of waivers.
4/ Report also found that #telehealth waivers played a critical role in maintaining access to services when beneficiaries and providers were concerned about the transmission of #COVID19.
5/ These findings reinforced by interviews with groups representing providers and beneficiaries confirming flexibilities enabled beneficiaries to continue accessing care.
6/ Then @USGAO starts to draw conclusions in a regressive, rigid way regarding digital access and f/w/a. First they invoke a study showing 26% Medicare benes lacking digital access to justify NOT covering telehealth to avoid perpetuating disparities...
7/ Latter conclusion completely misses mark; lack of digital access is for VIDEO, which is all the more reason to cover audio-only (with guardrails). Additionally, more justification for all of government approach to increase digital access NOT curtail telehealth reimbursement.
8/ Another flawed conclusion from @USGAO is their concern for f/w/a. f/w/a IS a concern but telehealth can be a mechanism to REDUCE not increase f/w/a if AI/ML is creatively applied to mine the digital exhaust of digital interventions to track and prevent f/w/a.
9/ Biggest miss of all is the failure to mention that the solution to sustainable, equitable achievement of the quadruple aim isn't limiting telehealth, it's accelerating value based payment. @USGAO you can do better.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrey Ostrovsky, MD, FAAP

Andrey Ostrovsky, MD, FAAP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AndreyOstrovsky

9 Mar
1/ Had conversation with a senior exec at publicly traded health insurance company who had some scathing insights about future of the industry from working at his company for the last several years. Bottomline: new-entrant tech-enabled insurers are going to each incumbents' lunch
2/ "No one has any idea of how to do innovation. They have no understanding of tactical care delivery. The closest to innovation is tiering their networks." This isn't generalizable to all publicly traded health insurers, but is consistent w/ my experience with this company.
3/ "I was so fascinated to get there a few years ago because they had [redacted] million lives but was so disappointed with how little they are doing. All I get back is a lot of no's to doing meaningful innovation."
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(