We’re asking everyone to join us in doing the same: nopalantir.org.uk
[THREAD]
Palantir, whom you might remember from 🍉 cocktail fame, is using COVID-19 to get their hooks into our NHS. They were brought in without public consultation or open procurement, and we had to threaten a lawsuit to get information about their data deal:
Time and again Palantir’s tech has been used to harm, not heal. Founded by Trump-backing Peter Thiel, they’ve enabled some of the worst actions of the US surveillance state - from border forces to police.
A firm like that has no place in our NHS.
Trust is the heart of our NHS. Without trust, there is no public health. Today at 5PM, we will hear from @labourlewis, @libertyhq, @everydoctorUK, @migrants_rights & others on why Palantir’s presence in the NHS undermines this very principle.
Palantir’s presence in the NHS poses a deeper question about its future - who gets to access our medical data and how? Should the NHS partner w/ a firm that says it wants to be in “every missile and every drone”- or should it manage health data in a way everyone can trust?
This issue is now urgent. The government is rushing through a scheme that will scrape the confidential health info of every man, woman, and child in England into a single data set - and NHS Digital have refused to rule out Palantir managing that data:
You can join us today in calling for Palantir to be dropped from the NHS - and for the future of health data to keep faith with patient trust: nopalantir.org.uk
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There IS no public health without public trust – so we were also v concerned when the gov’t wouldn’t rule out dodgy US tech companies like Palantir being given contracts to manage this giant new pool of confidential patient data:
Time is running out. The deadline to opt out is 23 June. Most people haven’t heard of the scheme. The gov’t hasn’t properly informed or involved patients.
If they don’t fix it, we’ve got to go for an injunction ASAP. We sent an urgent legal letter: ft.com/content/a13225…
Our coalition says the process for scraping 55m people’s confidential health records and putting in a central database has been rushed and unfair – and is unlawful.
Unless the scheme is stopped and changed, we will take the government to court.
⏰BREAKING: HMG quietly rolled out a scheme to seize - & sell access to - the health data of every man, woman, and child in England. Patients weren’t asked.
Legal issues? We think so. So we helped @JustTreatment send a legal letter. @madhumita29 in @FT: ft.com/content/9fee81…
In many ways, this fight is about the future of the NHS.
The NHS sits atop the most valuable trove of health data in the world. Why? For years, your GP record has been stored not in doctor's scrawled notes but using GP codes, which a computer can 'read'. (h/t @marcus_baw)
This makes NHS health data of *massive* interest to researchers. So far, so good - we all want the NHS to come out of the pandemic stronger.
But there are issues: who gets access? On what terms? Who can patients trust? And who benefits – us, the NHS, or private companies?
Special mention to our friends at @TBIJ who obtained key emails at the start of this case, showing Palantir wooing NHS execs and UK officials over Davos chats and watermelon cocktails.
2/ We love @signalapp. (We used to use @WhatsApp lots until Facebook took our data!)
Disappearing messages are great for us, the citizens. They're not appropriate for officials.
Why, you ask?
3/ Simple. The Public Records Act 1958 requires officials to review every message about the formulation of government policy to perform a legal check – in case it needs to be archived for public release.
If the message explodes, the check can never happen.
Last year, the government signed the largest data deal in history between the NHS and giant tech firms – like Palantir and Faculty, a British AI start-up involved with the Vote Leave campaign.
We took legal action and, with your support, forced them to publish the contracts.