Time is running out. The deadline to opt out is 23 June. Most people haven’t heard of the scheme. The gov’t hasn’t properly informed or involved patients.
If they don’t fix it, we’ve got to go for an injunction ASAP. We sent an urgent legal letter: ft.com/content/a13225…
Our coalition says the process for scraping 55m people’s confidential health records and putting in a central database has been rushed and unfair – and is unlawful.
Unless the scheme is stopped and changed, we will take the government to court.
We’ve also launched this petition - join us in telling Matt Hancock we won't let this stand. foxglove.org.uk/nhs-data
GPs are overwhelmed and most surgeries still remote – they can’t shoulder this burden. And they’re concerned about undermining trust between doctors and patients. Ask @TheDA_UK.
Lots of older people aren’t online – they’ve never heard of this. The @NPCUK knows all about it.
You can opt out - here’s @medConfidential’s handy guide - but this mess is on the gov't to sort.
They should explain exactly what they aim to do with people's private health records - and who gets access.
You can read @openDemocracy’s write up of this case, and why it matters, here from @carolinejmolloy. We’ve taken two cases with oD about NHS data before and are proud to be taking a third.
“The idea that 55m UK citizens’ confidential health data is going to be handed over to unknown companies with unknown controls is alarming.” - @carolecadwalla for @allthecitizens
(Citz organised @independentSage. Like us, they support research that keeps faith w patient trust.)
"Every single NHS patient we work with was completely shocked to hear this was happening....We urgently need the government to pause this process and allow a proper, informed national conversation on the use of our health data." - @diarmaidmcd of @JustTreatment
“My constituents don’t expect when they sit down with their family GP that their sensitive health data is going to be able to be accessed by all and sundry." - @daviddavisMP
“GPs were barely informed of this major change- how are patients expected to know? @TheDA_UK supports safe, consensual uses of patient data, including health research. But we want to see it done in a way that...won’t erode the relationship between doctor and patient." -@relshire
“The way that this has been done has excluded older people and is unfair. We’re very concerned about the lack of consultation and publicity about this except a lone government website. Most of our members have never heard of this." -Jan Shortt, @NPCUK
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There IS no public health without public trust – so we were also v concerned when the gov’t wouldn’t rule out dodgy US tech companies like Palantir being given contracts to manage this giant new pool of confidential patient data:
We’re asking everyone to join us in doing the same: nopalantir.org.uk
[THREAD]
Palantir, whom you might remember from 🍉 cocktail fame, is using COVID-19 to get their hooks into our NHS. They were brought in without public consultation or open procurement, and we had to threaten a lawsuit to get information about their data deal:
Time and again Palantir’s tech has been used to harm, not heal. Founded by Trump-backing Peter Thiel, they’ve enabled some of the worst actions of the US surveillance state - from border forces to police.
⏰BREAKING: HMG quietly rolled out a scheme to seize - & sell access to - the health data of every man, woman, and child in England. Patients weren’t asked.
Legal issues? We think so. So we helped @JustTreatment send a legal letter. @madhumita29 in @FT: ft.com/content/9fee81…
In many ways, this fight is about the future of the NHS.
The NHS sits atop the most valuable trove of health data in the world. Why? For years, your GP record has been stored not in doctor's scrawled notes but using GP codes, which a computer can 'read'. (h/t @marcus_baw)
This makes NHS health data of *massive* interest to researchers. So far, so good - we all want the NHS to come out of the pandemic stronger.
But there are issues: who gets access? On what terms? Who can patients trust? And who benefits – us, the NHS, or private companies?
Special mention to our friends at @TBIJ who obtained key emails at the start of this case, showing Palantir wooing NHS execs and UK officials over Davos chats and watermelon cocktails.
2/ We love @signalapp. (We used to use @WhatsApp lots until Facebook took our data!)
Disappearing messages are great for us, the citizens. They're not appropriate for officials.
Why, you ask?
3/ Simple. The Public Records Act 1958 requires officials to review every message about the formulation of government policy to perform a legal check – in case it needs to be archived for public release.
If the message explodes, the check can never happen.
Last year, the government signed the largest data deal in history between the NHS and giant tech firms – like Palantir and Faculty, a British AI start-up involved with the Vote Leave campaign.
We took legal action and, with your support, forced them to publish the contracts.