Yesterday, Bishop Barron, on a personal FB account, replied to an article posted by a Catholic Deacon. The article is by Black Catholic in the *Black Catholic Messenger.* +Barron said that the author needs to wake up, called CRT repugnant, and accused the deacon of calumny.
Bishop Barron also asserted that "everyone hates racism and wants to address it" and noted that he had recently had dinner with another Black Catholic. An hour later, he posted photos of this dinner on this official social media accounts.
This really happened. There was some question as to the verifiability of the account which was investigated by many, including direct requests for clarification from +Barron and Word on Fire. None of this falsified the exchange and, to my knowledge, +Barron has not responded.
Until this moment, Barron has enjoyed the benefit of the doubt and charity from many well-intended and good faith actors. A few of us have, have also experienced understandable caution and correction from many defenders of +Barron. Yesterday changes this situation.
+Barron is a very powerful clergyman in the Church, perhaps the most visibly prominent figure in the English-speaking world due to his longstanding engagement in digital media. Many respect and love him for well-earned reasons and, to be honest, many do not wish to cross him.
+Barron is not the sum of Word on Fire, although they often present themselves that way. We should see that the real issue here is with Bishop Barron and it is not primarily about CRT or wokeness. He made a public mistake. It is understandable but he needs to take responsibility.
If I am wrong about this personal mistake made in public or about the wider concerns related to CRT or wokeness, then, Barron owes many of us (above all the author of the article and the deacon) some kind of explanation and reasons. He is not above this. He is not a king.
There are other things I can add to this account, but for now, I will link the article and the Facebook thread to follow.
One more thing: I read every last word of the Pennsylvania Grand Jury and McCarrick Reports, before that I watched Maciel and Corapi in horror; just this weekend, I read about Kamloops and the 215 precious children. Giving Bishops free passes for any reason is NOT acceptable

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Rocha

Sam Rocha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SamRochadotcom

26 May
It makes conservative Catholics in the US extremely angry that their ideological foils (which hilariously includes the Pope!) never teach or promote overt theological errors while they, the great orthodox and faithful ones, do it on the daily and even rely upon it to survive.
No one is beyond reproach. Everyone's ideas deserve scrutiny, but that is not the same as promoting heresy or directly challenging Church teaching. On that matter, I've never said a single word that is unorthodox or heretical in all my public work.
Same goes for someone like Fr. Martin whose work I do not know very well but whom they are obsessed with. A critic might say we are careful in bad faith, questioning our motivations, but even that merely highlights how absolutely and totally sloppy and messy they are.
Read 8 tweets
26 May
I listened to Gloria's debut podcast episode late this morning and I've thought about it all day long. My wife and I spoke about it on our walk. It has lingered. I will probably re-listen tonight and maybe again tomorrow. Let me share a bit of why here, in an appreciation thread.
First, the sheer moral significance of Gloria debuting her show on the anniversary of the murder of George Floyd is enough to meditate on for a long time. The courage and statement and, of course, her "straight no chaser" opening monologue that simply starts THERE.
We really need to stop and appreciate what it means for Gloria to choose this day, of all days, to launch her new show and to not simply allow it to be an allusion or possible coincidence, but to name it and own it in all of its tragic moral reality.
Read 18 tweets
24 May
No big deal, but once again, whilst grilling, a stranger of a particular presenting identity, just *had* to confront me. In this case I was grilling next to the other public grill being used by a Spaniard and we were, naturally, speaking to one another in Spanish. This person...
...walked up to us (socially distanced) and asked "are you using BOTH grills?" I replied "Well, *I* am using this one here." The person realized they assumed we were a common "you" incorrectly and doubled down by exclaiming, "well, ugh, both of the other grills are not working!"
I'm not a maintenance person but I knew the person was wrong so I walked with them to another grill and started it. This made them even more angry and they complained that it did not work properly. I walked away. This bullshit gets old. It must be the 6th time here just grilling.
Read 5 tweets
25 Apr
In reply to @BishopBarron’s Angelus interview, shared on his Facebook page, repeating his well-known thoughts about contemporary social activism, I have posted the reply to follow. angelusnews.com/arts-culture/b…
@BishopBarron: You have said this same thing, in different ways and to different degrees, about this idiosyncratic usage of the term "woke," but you have yet to name anyone who is doing it.
You refer to philosophers by name as root ideologies but remain indirect in your disputes with contemporary voices you are critiquing, not to mention dismissive of these complex philosophical schools of thought (much more so than, for instance, Benedict XVI)...
Read 13 tweets
24 Apr
THREAD

I thank @Kinder_Cons for his astute comments on my recent remarks published by @brianfraga, and especially for his measured criticism. I want to reply with a small clarification, but I will first post the original post and the notes to follow, with my reply thereafter.
Here are my remarks contextualized by @brianfraga: patheos.com/blogs/onthecat…
Read 13 tweets
7 Apr
In less than a year, I have been on Catholic Answers debating Catholic socialism, Pints w/Aquinas and Crisis debating the 2020 US election, Fr. Leo Patalinghug’s podcast discussing his use of Twitter and antiracism, and dozens of hours on other podcasts on related topics. 1/2
I have no one blocked or muted (though I’m not against it in principle, with periodic jubilees) and have agreed to debate other right wing Catholics like Tim Gordon and AltPatrick who forfeited and blocked me. Now, who is the snowflake incapable of rational dialogue here? 2/2
PS: This excludes my published writing and public and private correspondence with my critics. I don’t need that extra part to show how absolutely bankrupt the conservative whining about cancel culture and a need for genuine debate is. I’m right here, and there are many of us.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(