One of my primary interests for a while has been online pro-Islamic State supporter networks. Why? Because I believe they're important and gives unique insight into what resonates among supporters. The Islamic State agrees. This week's editorial in al-Naba is about these networks 
The editorial explains how the military battle against the Islamic State is accompanied by a digital battle to destroy its virtual component. No surpriser here, the Islamic State claims to have won this digital battle.
[My comment] This is partly true, partly wrong. Online supporter networks still exist and they perform an increasingly importante duty of the Islamic State's online battle. Yet, operationally the environment is much more restricted than just a few years back.
The editorial highlights intelligence efforts to dismantle these networks, captured their leading figures and stir internal suspicion. This too failed, it claims.
[My comment] the above is not quite so true. IS supporters have been feeling the pressure and networks (like muntasir) have closed down while leading figures have been arrested (e.g. ATP leader Carpenter)]
The editorial calls on supporters to continue their dedicated work that is like an arrow against the enemies and asks them to be cautious to avoid capture. They should close ranks, work together for their common goals.
[My comment] The above is happening as we speak as we see how official and unofficial media outlets are starting to work closer together. This is a highly interesting development that is taking place right now.
Finishing the piece, the al-Naba editorial lays out that this is not simply a voluntary action for the virtual fighters of the Islamic State but a duty that they must commit to.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
