Those who quote MLK's content of character line to oppose affirmative action (tho he supported it) are the same who rationalize stop & frisk & racial profiling by referencing aggregate crime data. They judge Black folk on what they think Blackness means, not personal character...
They are nothing but frauds and hypocrites. They believe in judging Blackness -- people, communities, families, culture -- based on stereotypes and false generalities. They just don't like people pointing out sociological truth about white advantage and racism...
They are incapable of arguing against charges of systemic racism w/o devolving into anti-Blackness: critiques of Black family structure, Black cultural norms (or at least what they think to be such norms). Yet they accuse antiracists of judging people based on group identity...
If it weren't so dangerous it would be a master class in absurdity; almost funny. As it is, it's deadly serious...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People rarely think about all the ways that "race-neutral" normal, everyday policies and practices perpetuate and help deepen racial disparities in this country. But they should. Because this too is a large part of what we mean by systemic racism
A thread
When people hear the term "systemic racism" they think those using it mean that every institution is teeming with bigots just waiting to harm Black people or other POC. But that isn't what is meant by the term...(2)
Indeed, some of the most important drivers of systemic racism are not deliberate or intentional at all. Not to say there aren't such intentional elements, but they aren't necessary for racial inequity (and thus racism at a systemic level) to become sedimented...(3)
So, basically, Chuck Woolery is siding with Hitler here...good to know. Oh, and BTW, fact check. Critical Race Theory was actually a RESPONSE to traditional Critical Theory, which CRT saw as largely ignoring the role of racism in American law and society. Don't y'all have Google?
I also love that Chuck says Hitler "cracked down" on his enemies...interesting way to describe what Hitler did to those he viewed in that manner...
Critical Theory traditionally was class centric & Critical Legal Studies (direct precursor to CRT) downplayed the centrality of racism & the Black experience to the law. CRT was a corrective to that. To call it Marxist is lazy. It was a response to Marxist class reductionism
All you need to know about conservatives when it comes to debates about racism in America is this: these people believe the Civil Rights Act was wrong to prohibit racial discrimination in the private sector bc they think property owners' rights outweigh all else (thread)...
They admit this if you push them. Sometimes you don't even have to. Ben Shapiro says it openly, for instance. Which means the "progress" they brag about in "prohibiting discrimination" and systemic racism is progress they don't even support having happened (2)...
Had it been up to them, for instance, lunch counter operators could have continued to prohibit Blacks from dining at their establishments. Oh sure, they'll say they personally find those businesses' racism awful and would personally have not shopped/eaten there...(3)
The entirety of conservative political thought is now "replacement theory" paranoia. First, that Dems and the left broadly are trying to physically replace white people with brown folk from other countries...
But then if that fails, we're plotting (supposedly) to replace the dominant uncritical white narrative of America (as a shining city on a hill) w/a critique that holds the nation up as a font of racist evil. In short, we're trying to replace the people or the story, or both...(2)
This is what people sound like when they've been so high on their own hegemony for so long they've never had to think about sharing physical or narrative space with people different than themselves. So pluralism feels like oppression to them...(3)
Conservative Christians attack Critical Race Theory for supposedly teaching that whites today should be held responsible for the sins of their fathers & are inherently racist. Yet they believe humans are held responsible today by God for original sin, & are inherently sinful...
2/ Fact is, CRT doesn't say whites are inherently racist, bc it rejects the notion of races as categories with inherent tendencies/traits. And the idea that the nation should be responsible for its history of oppression is not a CRT idea. It's a basic moral principle of justice..
3/ But the right DOES believe in inherent tendencies. Sinfulness for humans (all Eve's fault of course, bc they like blaming women for things), for instance. And it is right-wingers who embraced The Bell Curve which suggests biological inferiority for Black people...
A year after the murder of George Floyd, it seems that much of the focus of anti-racism efforts has been on challenging white people to change personally rather than challenging structures of inequity...And yes, I know people maintain systems but stick with me here...
2/ If the issue is a justice system predicated on domination & control, implicit bias training is bullshit. The structure demands what it demands...The system produces inequity regardless of personal cop/DA/judge/jury bias...
3/ It does this by operating on a logic that says we need to have a top-down social control mechanism (police, courts) cleaning up the mess of a society we allow to produce chaos bc of mass inequity...