Here's a critique of Benitez's ruling from an Everytown official that's actually possible to have a discussion about. I'm sure many won't agree with it but it at least engages the text of the decision as well as the text of Heller and Miller.
I think the dancing around Miller is pretty awkward, honestly. Miller was a pretty week opinion in a barely-litigated case with zero analysis of what the Second Amendment actually protects. Heller didn't need to overturn it to get where it was going so it didn't.
I've always thought Heller made a lot of compromises to get 5 votes and is more symbolic than anything. Setting the precedent that the Second Amendment at least means something was big after a 20th Century orthodoxy that declared it pointless.
But all it really says is law-abiding Americans have a right to own a handgun in their own home for self-defense. That's it. And there were very few places that tried to outlaw that by 2008. Heller didn't even set any real test for how lower courts should handle gun cases.
Lower courts filed in the lack of a test with their own balancing tests that mostly sided with governments. 13-years later gun-rights activists are still hoping the Supreme Court will set an explicit standard for judging gun cases. That's the bigger goal in the New York case.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Gutowski

Stephen Gutowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephenGutowski

5 Jun
NEW: Federal Judge Rules California 'Assault Weapons' Ban Unconstitutional thereload.com/california-ass…
“The banned ‘assault weapons’ are not bazookas, howitzers, or machineguns. Those arms are dangerous and solely useful for military purposes. Instead, the firearms deemed ‘assault weapons’ are fairly ordinary, popular, modern rifles." thereload.com/california-ass…
The ruling does not go into immediate effect. A temporary 30-day stay was granted so the California AG has time to file an appeal.
Read 6 tweets
4 Jun
It's a lot of work modifying the way The Reload functions in addition to doing the reporting and running the backend. Sometimes it's incredibly stressful as well. But it's also extremely rewarding being able to tweak everything myself and respond to members' feature requests.
Of course, The Reload wouldn't be anywhere near the quality it is without the work put in by others. @P_Crookston has noticeably improved much of the writing with his editing and insights. The guys at Astroluxe Innovations have also saved me on the tech side multiple times.
Aspects of running The Reload are definitely a team effort but the combination of WordPress, Elementor, WooComerce, and some other key software really allow me to change basically anything I want about how the site looks and feels in very little time and for very little money.
Read 4 tweets
4 Jun
NEW: Pennsylvania experienced an explosion in gun-carry licenses in 2020—except in Philadelphia, where residents were plagued by shutdowns and roadblocks thrown up by local authorities. thereload.com/pennsylvania-g…
While gun-carry licensing the rest of the state rose by 25% in 2020, it fell by 19% in Philly. That's despite a 158% increase in gun sales in the city. And it came after periodic shutdowns in permitting and a broken one-of-a-kind application system. thereload.com/pennsylvania-g…
Philly sidestepped state law requiring gun-carry licenses be issued 45 days after application by simply refusing to take applications without an appointment and appointments stretched out over a year. Some residents couldn't even get an appointment at all. thereload.com/pennsylvania-g…
Read 6 tweets
27 May
This is a weirdly threatening thing to say as somebody running to be in the government.
It's odd to start from the assumption that people do, indeed, need protection from their governments, reject the idea that an armed populous offers any protection, and offer no alternative.
This is a lot like when Congressman Swallwel, who was running for President at the time, said resisting government tyranny was pointless because the president could just nuke his own country. A very odd thing to say as a candidate for office.
Read 4 tweets
26 May
This isn't correct, @nytimes. Automatic weapons are already heavily regulated and new sales to civilians are banned. Chipman wants to ban and regulate tens of millions of semi-automatic weapons in the same way. nytimes.com/2021/05/26/us/…
Understanding the difference between "automatic" and "semi-automatic" is not difficult but this is one of the most common mistakes I still see in media. Even at the highest levels as evidenced in this Times piece.
It's a particularly embarrassing mistake, frankly. The kind that makes anyone who spots it immediately skeptical of everything else you're saying on the topic.
Read 4 tweets
26 May
Chipman is addressing his time a Waco as an ATF agent. He says the picture circulating online which some claim is him standing in the ashes of the Waco compound is not a picture of him.
Chipman says he should not have said helicopters were shot down at Waco since that wasn't true. He claims he meant to say they were "forced down" by gun fire.
The first question from Senator Grassley (R., IA) to ATF nominee Chipman is about Hunter Biden's 2018 gun purchase. He is complaining the ATF hasn't turned over records to him.
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(