American MSM seems to be free in the same way that the old Soviet joke argued that Soviet papers are free: they are free to attack ceaselessly those who have been designated "enemies".
The last 12 months of Sinophobia were painful to watch and read.
It brings memories of similar hysterias: after Sept 11 (Taliban turned within a day from heroes to villains), in the run up to the Iraq war (nuclear arms were everywhere but UN was just stupid or corrupt not to see), then on Iran (where is now Ahmedinejad the new Hitler?) etc.
The point is not that China is blameless or right or great, the point is that one should exert some common sense and tact when writing, and not publish 100% of phobic articles.
The hysteria encourages bad, lazy and ignorant writers (and this shows): if you invent any negative story on China, it will be published---no matter how badly written or badly sourced.
Learn from history and use some tact.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Branko Milanovic

Branko Milanovic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BrankoMilan

6 Jun
A thread on "Borgen".
I just finished the first series (10 episodes, I think) of "Borgen". It was way above my expectations which indeed were low, based on the idea that a political drama in a country as orderly as Denmark cannot be very interesting.
To some extent, it is true (see my points below), but the show does the best with what it has. Its objective is to document how illusions are gradually destroyed when one is faced with the hard reality of politics. (The acting is excellent too.)
But while the PM compromises on most of her original beliefs, and while there is lots of maneuvering and horse-trading among the politicians, everything is done within the rules and within the law.
So what is apparently not done in Denmark?
Read 8 tweets
3 Jun
It comes as an unpleasant surprise.
I was reading the published multi-year correspondence between Kawabata and Mishima (both of whom I admire). it is entirely about very mundane things: weather, food recipes, travel, publishers.
War is never mentioned, even if the exchange of letters begins in the Spring of 1945.
But then suddenly Kawabata describes his manipulation (although he does not call it such) of PEN to become a candidate for Nobel.
Then asks Mishima to write a recommendation. Mishima rightly (and very politely; he is a junior partner in this relationship) replies that, given his reputation, it may be counterproductive.
Read 4 tweets
28 May
Many years ago when I read Neruda's excellent memoirs (I would suggest the book to everyone), I was a bit puzzled by Neruda going ecstatic in front of every Siberian dam when the same dam would leave him ice- cold in the US.
But then I thought I understood.
A dam built by capitalists is built by clever rich people who try to extract money by selling electricity to the poor. And they are clever enough to have hired the best engineers to do it.
But a dam built by workers is built in order to provide the light and heat to other workers. And workers thereby showed that, however downtrodden and mistreated they historically were, they could match best capitalists.
Read 7 tweets
27 May
My article "After the Financial Crisis: The Evolution of the Global Income Distribution Between 2008 and 2013" just published today:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ro…
Using the newly created, and in terms of coverage and detail, the most complete household income data from more than 130 countries, the paper analyzes the changes in the global income distribution between 2008 and 2013.
This was the period of the global financial crisis and recovery. It is shown that global inequality continued to decline, largely due to China’s and India’s high growth rates that explain about two-thirds of the global Gini decrease between 2008 and 2013.
Read 4 tweets
23 May
(A thread; of interest to few).
Rereading @IsabellaMWeber book, a Q (to me) naturally arises:
Why were Chinese utterly uninterested in Yugoslav socialism? There were important EEuropean participants but no Yugoslav (except A Bajt and his role was minimal).
It is a puzzle.
Yugo (SFRJ) was way ahead in "reforms" compared to HUN, CZE, POL. The issues discussed by Brus, Sik in 1980s in China were issued discussed in SFRJ in 1965. So why were the Chinese uninterested in a more "advanced" socialist reform?
Several possibilities.
1 Chinese invited EEuropean "emigré" economists who tried reforms in their own countries (Kornai does not fit that scheme though). SFRJ had no significant "emigré" economists to invite. The were all in country.
Read 5 tweets
22 May
(Long thread on Africa)
I enjoy reading @scepticalranil weekend Economics & Marginalia. They are great commentated weekly summaries of the new in development and around development.
In his latest
cgdev.org/blog/economics…
Ranil kindly comments on my recent "primer" on global inequality. He likes it, but he thinks that I am wrong on the lack of African convergence. But while there is unconditional convergence in the world, this is thanks to Asia. Not Africa.

glineq.blogspot.com/2021/05/notes-…
Look at the next picture: it gives you the ratio of Sub Saharan Africa's population-weighted GDPpc to the global mean GDPpc (all in international dollars).
It shows that around independence Africa's GDPpc was about 1/2 of the world level.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(