Very often, people tell me some form of "the real problem is that we are afraid to do anything about the problem."

A variant is that "if Democrats would just fight like Republicans, they could win."

There are a few problems with this.
Generally when I push back and ask, "What specifically should Democrats (or 'we') do?" I get vague answers.

DO SOMETHING.

Here's the problem. The Republicans are trying to destroy democracy, so they are breaking rules and cheating.

1/
For Democracy and rule of law to survive, at least one side has to use democratic means.

If Democrats also break rules and cheat, this would mean both sides are torpedoing democracy.

This would make it true that "both sides are the same."

2/
My Republican acquaintances save face by telling me that
the "Democrats are just as bad."

As of now, they are not. Why would we want to make it true?

Here's the problem with democracy, and why so many people lose patience with it . . .

3/
To once more quote @dziblatt and Steven Levitsky: Democracy is slow, grinding work. Change is slow.

Autocracies have a lot of appeal because an autocrat can blow through the rules and get things done NOW.

Autocrats FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT.

4/
In 2018, a lawyer on Twitter (an outrage agent) announced in bold: If Trump isn't removed immediately democracy will be destroyed.

I pointed out that without the Senate on board, there were no legal means for removing Trump.

She called me a bad lawyer and blocked me.

5/
It looks like 550 people will be charged with the insurrection. It's possible (I'd say likely) that the instigators of the riot will also be charged.

Trump is facing a very large number of civil and criminal investigations.

Rule of law takes time.

6/
I know it's frustrating. It may take a few election cycles before we can bring about all the changes we want.

Another problem is the idea that we can "win" this fight, meaning "vanquish the enemy."

Actually, the enemy will not go away.

7/
Anti-democratic forces have been with us since the start of the nation. They supported the institution of slavery. They made sure women had to remain in the 'private sphere.' They supported racial segregation. On Jan, 6th, they stormed the Capitol.

8/
We push forward and they push back. The fight never ends unless we give up. Then we lose.

Well, I guess I went on a bit of a Sunday morning tear.

If you want to know what you can do, see: terikanefield.com/things-to-do/

9/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

8 Jun
The biggest threat to American democracy is that the Republicans draw more than 46% support nationwide and legitimately win local elections.

That's a lot of support for an anti-democratic platform.

Autocracy has lots of appeal. Democracy is slow, grinding work.
Some people dislike democracy because they lose patience with it.

But I'm not naive: I understand that most of the 46.9% who voted for Trump prefer a hierarchy.

They don't believe equality is possible, so they reject democracy . . .

. . . they think nature naturally forms a hierarchy. They think that white men were at the top of the hierarchy for most of our history because they deserve it.

When others want equality, they hear the demand for equality as a desire to replace them at the top of the hierarchy.
Read 5 tweets
6 Jun
(Thread)

This week I talked about how the rise of conspiracy theories in the Republican Party as a way to undermine democracy has deep roots in the American conservative tradition.

Stand by for a transcript, if you prefer to read.


1/
In other words, Mike Lindell didn't spring out of nowhere.
The Republican base was primed for theorists like Mike Lindell.

An edited transcript is here: terikanefield.com/the-rise-of-co…

I'll do a short Twitter summary (some of this is expanded from stuff I tweeted this week.)
I also talk about how the rise of conspiracy theories is causing a radicalization of the Republican Party: As the party sheds itself of nonbelievers and goes to the true believers for fundraising, the party is unhinging itself more from reality.
Read 13 tweets
5 Jun
I think part of what is causing this is a spiral of radicalization.

As the insurrection and ensuing craziness drive away moderates and traditional conservatives, the leaders turn more to the QAnon crazies, who now form a majority of those who identify as Republicans.
I don't see how the Republicans can break this cycle.

The only way to hold together a coalition that can deliver more than 40% of the vote is to cater to the QAnon base.

So they can't get behind a leader who rejects Trump and QAnon.
I don't know that they're imploding as much as shrinking and hardening into a far-right extremist party.

Even some of my diehard Republican acquaintances are getting embarrassed, but one thinks the solution is to nominate Nikki Haley 🤦‍♀️

Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
This was one of the Republican Party's most successful propaganda efforts. A way to help break government is to make people hate it. Reagan was a master at this bit of propaganda.

Hamilton understood that the way to give a government legitimacy was for it to help people.
Why did they want to "break" the federal government?

After the Civil Rights movement, the white supremacists, corporate interests, and white Evangelicals found themselves with a common goal: Dismantle the federal government.

Each had their own reasons.
White Evangelicals wanted the church to run people's lives.

White Supremacists resented the Supreme Court's decision to desegregate America and federal legislation that made that happen.

Corporations wanted to dismantle the New Deal and regulatory agencies.
Read 13 tweets
2 Jun
I've been channeling my inner Prof. @dziblatt all this time when I've been saying democracy will survive if enough people want it to and are willing to do the work.

From @dziblatt: “Democracy requires constant mending"

Also from Ziblatt: "Protecting voting rights . . .
. . .is hard, grinding work. It may even take more than one election cycle. It may take a decade.”

That's because there've always been (and probably always will be) anti-democratic forces trying to break down democracy.

Channeling my inner @dZiblatt was easy because I devoured:
See my list: terikanefield.com/things-to-do/

I should probably move #10 up to #1.
(I don't just talk. I've done legal voter protection work in 3 states.)
Read 4 tweets
1 Jun
I see people are shocked that what Flynn said over the weekend is protected under the First Amendment.

If you want to know where the line is drawn, I've done a few explainers about the First Amendment Defense to inciting an insurrection.

Stand by for a few link
I talked about Giuliani's [weak] First Amendment defense to the charge that he incited an insurrection (in the suit brought by Rep. Swalwell.)

If you prefer a 17-minute talk, it's here:


In the next Tweet, I'll give you an [edited] transcription.
Here is the edited transcript. The stuff about Giuliani's First Amendment defense starts about halfway down. terikanefield.com/justice-and-ru…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(