Thread re: #CryinMo , Service of Process, and Insurance coverage.
We see here Mo cryin’ like a colicky baby. Why is that? The reason is his wife was just served with process - a lawsuit - righteously instituted by @RepSwalwell for #CryinMo ‘s antics inciting an insurrection 1/
on January 6th. Now you may ask, but they didn’t serve him. Don’t they have to do that in order to have “good” or proper service? No. A process server - plaintiff hires a company - can serve a person “of suitable age and discretion.” In this case, it’s #CryinMo ‘s wife. 2/
She’s someone who resides with him, over 18 years of age, and not active duty military - can be called away at a moments notice and unable to inform service target of the lawsuit - so she fits the criteria for someone being of “suitable age and discretion.” Now #CryinMo can 3/
allege in his answer to the lawsuit - affirmative defense - that his wife isn’t of “suitable discretion.” Let’s say they’re estranged, separated, or going through a divorce? He can allege that she didn’t have the “ability” to accept service on his behalf. Issues of service 4/
can get funky. Recently, my office attempted service on an individual outside of the country. After much due diligence, we were unsuccessful. We made an aapplication to the Court requesting alternate service via email on a representative of the defendant in the US. EDNY 5/
Judge granted it. CryinMo will most likely not be successful with this defense as the Court will likely find service was “good” or perfected on his wife. Now why else is Mo Cryin’? He’s Cryin’ pretty hard bc he may not have insurance coverage for this lawsuit. 6/
When someone who has assets like #CryinMo they should have insurance coverage in the event of a loss or lawsuit. Insurance policies can cover a myriad of events. It’s questionable whether they’ll cover this particular suit due to the fact it concerns inciting a riot 7/
and insurrection against kickass Congressman @RepSwalwell his colleagues, and the USA. If there is no insurance coverage, #CryinMo will be cryin’ a whole lot louder bc he’ll have to come out of pocket for defense costs and any settlement or verdict. That will probably run 8/
into the millions for #CryinMo Sad #CryinMo has a lot to be sad and cryin’ about. X
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I watch the entire footage that’s been made public. The officers had probable cause for a traffic stop to check on his temp tags. However, the did not have PC to deploy this type of force against Lt. Nazario, a member of the National Guard. PC to detain and force are two 1/
separate things. LEOs require PC in each instance. There’s a claim by the apprehending officers that there was a 90 second delay between the direction to stop and when Nazario pulled over. Has this been substantiated? And if so, by whom? If true, it still doesn’t justify 2/
the force deployed against him. The officers did not have probable cause to search him or the vehicle. Hence, excessive force. Whoever deployed pepper spray and assaulted Nazario should be fired and charged. If he improperly displayed his temp tags, give him a summons 3/
I’ve successfully litigated a number of 4th amendment cases where my clients were stopped, frisked, questioned, & arrested when they didn’t have identification on them. What usually happens is they are put through the system and released after 24+ hours w all charges are 1/
dropped. There is no legal requirement to have ID on ones person nor should there be. #COVID19 vaccine info should be kept w ones medical records like MMR & other vaccines are kept. There should also not be a requirement to present photo ID when one votes. Voter fraud is 2/
virtually non-existent and the only examples I can recall are ones committed by Republicans. npr.org/2019/07/30/746… 3/
America is far from perfect but the great thing about our country is we can always make it a better place. Counties like Russia or China have always remained the same. Power focused within a few select individuals or corrupt group benefiting the few. It’s been that way since 1/
their inception centuries ago. Whether it’s a Tzar, Emperor, or General Secretary, both nations have swung between authoritarianism and totalitarianism. They don’t appreciate what a free and empowered populace can accomplish. They only know manipulation, suppression & 2/
terror. Mass death in the tens of millions have plagued these virtually failed states. From the Cultural Revolution to the Purges of Stalin and the Red Scare, they know nothing but torment and death. They haven’t yet experienced what a free ppl can accomplish if motivated 3/
The pardon isn’t all encompassing and only address crimes linked to the Mueller investigation. Notice how DOJ had to make a motion before the Court again in order to dismiss the prosecution. If Judge Sullivan acknowledges the pardon as valid and not an attempt at
obstruction of justice by POTUS, he will dismiss the case. Flynn will still remain a convicted felon. If he appoints a special counsel - amicus curie - most likely Gleeson again - he’s opening the door to challenge the validity of the pardon based upon corrupt intent, a lawful
act used for an unlawful purpose. What’s interesting is that this pardon is limited and not blanket for all federal crimes committed prior to its issuance. My feeling and hope is that Judge Sullivan will further task Judge Gleeson, ret with investigating the basis and
So it appears Trump may attempt to pardon Flynn. This was expected. No surprise here. We need to take a breath and understand that this will not work out for Trump or Flynn. We have already seen what Judge Sullivan has done when Barr attempted to dismiss Flynn’s prosecution 1/
The Court said “hold on” and appointed special counsel to investigate it - Judge Gleeson, ret. - and refused to do so. This then went to the DC circuit and ultimately Judge Sullivan’s rulings not to dismiss Flynn’s prosecution was ultimately upheld. 2/
I have the same inclination I had before that Judge Sullivan will take a similar stance to appoint special counsel - Gleeson most likely will continue - to review and probably challenged the legality of the pardon. We have also seen the beginnings of this before 3/
Every infection, disability, and death caused by #COVID19 only makes us weaker. It diminishes us and America like a wasting disease. This is what our enemies want. For America to fade away. I don’t care if you’re a Republican, Democrat or anything else. I don’t want anyone 1/
else falling prey to this pandemic. We have much work to do after Biden is sworn in. It’s all hands on deck for the foreseeable future. If we want an equitable, prosperous, and strong America, we need to work hard for it. Our needs will only be fulfilled if we work to elect /2
people who act in our best interests. Party is irrelevant. What does the candidate truly offer us? Will this person insist that our institutions answer to the American people and act in an effect and efficient manner? Will our press report unbiasedly and shun narratives, 3/