That mainstream media like @bbc and @andrewmarr9 can even entertain giving air time to a man who deceived in order to start multiple wars demonstrates how broken our political and media system is. Some reminders:- #NoVaccinePassports
1) Here is Blair conspiring with US president George Bush to attack Iraq, Iran and Syria just weeks after the 9/11 event. opendemocracy.net/piers-robinson…
3) And here is General Wesley Clark explaining that these western leaders of the 'free world' were planning on attacking seven countries, 'regime-change wars', all ending with Iran:- @timtron2020
4) Tony Blair's proven involvement with deceptions leading to multiple wars and the deaths now of millions since 2001, all triggered by an event itself which is now combining under increasing scrutiny:- amazon.co.uk/SEVEN-Ed-Asner…
6) All the while the planning for decades of 'regime change war' war was underway, Tony Blair was saying this to the British public and the mainstream media were slavishly and adoringly reporting it:- @21WIRE@medialens
7) And today, here we are again, massive propaganda and deception over COVID 19 and the same politicians and media promoting nefarious agendas:- @offguardian@catte_black@_whitneywebb
8) As @bobscartoons and many others are now saying, ever more loudly that it is time for *everyone* to wake up to very real dystopia we are now witnessing. Stop blindly trusting the mainstream media
10) Waking up to the propaganda the population has been subjected to is the first step to ending this nightmarish descent into authoritarianism and dystopia. If we fail, we fail our children and generations to come.
Dear @INakamitsu and @BWoodward_UN, once again the @opcw Director General has smeared his own inspectors and refused to address key questions regarding the controversial #Douma investigation. The questions remain:-
1) Why was the original interim secretly altered, without the knowledge of the Douma team, and then an attempt made to publish an inaccurate and 'spun' report? See @ClarkeMicah report on this hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2019/11/new-se…
2) Why was the key conclusion by 4 NATO toxicologists that the 43 deceased at Douma were not killed by chlorine at Location 2 expunged from the Final FFM Report? Consultation minutes are here wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…@CL4Syr@MichaKobs
@thomasphipps, you seem to suffer from a rather limited vocabulary .... 'useful idiot', 'war crime denier' when talking about the alleged Douma attack. Perhaps you would like to, on behalf of the UK government, answer the following questions:- @OPCW@DanyaChaikel@SaretaAshraph
1) Why was the key conclusion by 4 NATO chem. weapon experts that the 43 deceased at Douma were not killed by chlorine gas at Location 2 censored in the Final OPCW report? You can read the minutes from the consultation here:- wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
2) It concluded that chlorine gas would not have caused these civilians to drop dead on the spot, gathering in piles.
Yes, and for the record, I think the interview and accompanying article in @offguardian have aged rather well, one might say the analysis was right on the money!:-
And I note, with some hilarity, that it is the corporate 'liberal' media who are today peddling little green men stories 😂😂 ...well done folks, keep up the good work 🤨
@bellingcat & @N_Waters89 continue attempts to smear @OPCW whistleblowers & all those raising questions about the investigation of the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma/Syria 2018 and, most seriously, suppress the truth about this event. @ClarkeMicah@2ndNewMoon
2) With respect to the Douma incident itself, remarkably, @bellingcat were caught deleting a tweet that evidenced manipulation of a cylinder allegedly dropped from a Syrian Air Force helicopter, at Location 2:-
As the @opcw's DG has chosen to again spread false information regarding whistleblower scientists from his own organisation, it is worth reminding why so many people, eminent and otherwise, are concerned about the Douma investigation @aaronjmate@PaulWalkerGG@ambLisaHelfand:-
2) It is also now established that a toxicology assessment from NATO experts, which ruled out chlorine gas as the cause of 43 deaths at Location 2, was effectively deleted from the Final Report @DarylGKimball
Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü & @CSRisks, asking questions and not getting straight answers from the @opcw does not constitute an 'intense defamation campaign'. Let's ask some of the key questions again shall we:- @Tim_Hayward_
2) Why was the assessment of 4 NATO toxicologists, that the victims at Location 2 were not killed by chlorine gas, removed from the Final Report with all record of the NATO assessment removed? @2ndNewMoon