@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper You're looking at politics as sides being negatives of each other. You have a culty - conservative spectrum. People who seek and push "causes", and people who just want to grill. All the bad things come from all the causes. Medieval Inquisitors = Nazis = Bolsheviks = SJWs
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper I'm not just mouth-shitting here. What limited research on cults there are (and it's extremely shallow and has a criminally high words:data ratio) all points to shitlibs joining what are formally considered "cults".
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper Moreover, we know from twin studies the h2 of political views is around 0.4, and we know that "conservatives" have been outbreeding "liberals" for the past 70 or so years. Meaning ~1900 and earlier, people were more "genetically liberal". But if that didn't result in...
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper more xenophilic self-hating weirdness, that's evidence that the genetic correlates with "liberalism" today don't necessarily manifest as any particular religion - just as religiosity has an h2 of around 0.4, but specific religion is zero.
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper Sorry I use "religion" and "ideology" interchangeably. Moreover, "liberals" are into all manners of causes, they posess the psychological traits of people who join cults, and it's partly genetic - but the extreme ones must have that genetic tendency.
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper Like with elite athletes, what separates them is genetics, since they're all getting the best training available at the time. While the variation around the middle can be down to diet and exercise, at the elite end, nearly all variance is down to genes.
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper With the extreme shitlibs, they all have their heads filled with trash, but only the biggest cultists will accept 200% of it. They had nothing to do with the industrial revolution, they're not more inventive, they will sell out their people for any dumb shiny new religion.
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper What is "conservative" is just degrees of not-being-socialized. That's why the "most conservative" is just saying "Yeah I don't really like nabbers or queers". It's grug, and that's why it survives despite having no institutions. Ironically, shitlibs are struggling to explain...
@JustThi30117912 @Peoples_Pundit @1tsakeeper ... why "conservatism" (which isn't really a thing as much as it is a lack of a thing and a return to monke) just, won't, die. Of course if "conservatism" really were just a socialized doctrine, yes, it would be dead.

And that's why mass immigration.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FREESOIL 🇮🇱

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Freesoilyeah

8 Jun
@TheNotoriousJOB @vinuemunizzioni Sadly those are probably underestimates that result from genetic similarity.

Basically, races have allele frequencies that are similar and some that are different. This is why, even if someone is 100% ancestrally Scandanavian, they may register as 0.1% Vietnamese.
@TheNotoriousJOB @vinuemunizzioni That's because they happen to have some allele frequencies that are more common among Vietnamese than Norwegians.

Like, on most of the genome, Africans and Europeans don't differ very much in allele frequency. Ancestry is a probabilistic estimate.
@TheNotoriousJOB @vinuemunizzioni And so to estimate European ancestry, they're looking at alleles Africans have that are more common among Europeans, and doing all kinds of weightings. Over a large number, the idea is that this will be broadly accurate. But as admixture increases, it gets more muddled.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
@vinuemunizzioni But that's from the black side. The white population is larger, and if, say, the white population is always about 5x the black population, you get the % of whites who bred with blacks. Which is like ~0.336% per generation.

It's going to be a little higher b/c admixture gets...
@vinuemunizzioni ...dampened as Euro admixture increases. Like, at 25% admixture, the effect of additional admixture is only 75%.

Plus, additional black slaves being imported up to 1807 means that the % of whites who bred with blacks was like, I dunno, 0.6% per generation.
@vinuemunizzioni So that's who ACTUALLY bred with blacks. But then the question - what percentage was WILLING to breed with blacks? That's a bit tricky, because for some whites it may be black or nothing, and so even the percent that did, some of those it may have been as "last option".
Read 4 tweets
3 Jun
@Tallocat It's directional though. Maybe it would be easier to think about other places and times first. What would be the range of debate in the USSR in 1950? Someone who thinks "stalin didn't go far enough" might face some censure. But do you see how irrelevant that is?
@Tallocat The big cult of that place and time is "communism" or whatever. And the spectrum of thought is limited because the spectrum of speech is limited. The fact that turbo cultists get censured is irrelevant to the problem. The problem is this giant cult and the majority of thought
@Tallocat that is prohibited. For example, in the US, sure, you may have people who say "whites aren't punished enough we need to go harder", and they might get censured. Sure, but do you see how that's irrelevant?

The foundational beliefs are all established. For example, genetic...
Read 8 tweets
30 May
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reprogram…

Transgenerational epigenetic effects are going to be limited to a few sites that avoid demethylation. Histone rotation, as far as I can tell, is completely reset by meiosis itself. I can't conceive how that would be sustained through that.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot Now those sites do exist, and there's no shortage of shitlib academics who will copiously document every loci that avoids the germline reset, but perhaps this is why they never give their findings an estimated effect size on an operationalized trait.
@AnonCandle @mr_plrm @mythinkspot Like, this epigenetics stuff sorta just floats around as an academic hobby horse used to "debunk racists" and give pseudos some brain candy. But it never reaches policy because it doesn't have any impact. I generally throw wet blankets on environmental interventions, but...
Read 10 tweets
28 May
I hear people who were saying "China has X or Y problem", and my thought is it doesn't matter because China has a sovereign acting national government, the US doesn't.

Meaning that if there's some problem, the Chinese government, being an oligarchy, can respond quickly to
problems. What seemed obvious to me is the purpose of the state is as "the sword and hammer of the nation". Where the disparate resources can be concentrated at focal points.

If the state makes an error, like, I dunno, building a giant city that nobody moved to, they can recover
Because the oligarchy can look at it, realize it was a mistake, and then do whatever needs to be done to deal with that mistake. In the US, being a democracy, say they make a similar problem (obviously scaled down for the smaller population) - okay, what is the mechanism to...
Read 11 tweets
28 May
@rodinrodin7 Okay, that's actually a really good point. The potato had about double the calories per acre-year of just about any grain, and Europe got them before the rest of Eurasia.

But regarding your point of hidebound regimes outside Europe - I think that's an attempt to explain a...
@rodinrodin7 ... genetic change in NW Europe that radiated later and less profoundly from the North Sea area - in conventional, non-genetic terms.

Keep in mind, 99% of "historians" believe a kind of radical genetic equality of man and explain everything through circumstance and institutions.
@rodinrodin7 Now this can actually work *fairly* well, because institutions are often related to the genetic characteristics of the population. I.e. institutions spring from the genetics. So by ONLY looking at institutions, you're implicitly capturing some effects of genetics.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(