"I oppose cold war escalations, but if China's responsible for Covid we need to get the truth."

And who do you imagine will be "getting" this "truth"? In what possible scenario could such an inquiry lead to objective truth unmanipulated by the western cold warriors pushing this?
I'd really like specific answers to this question. How SPECIFICALLY do people imagine an inquiry into the lab leak theory taking place in a way that can lead to unmanipulated facts, or indeed anything other than more cold war escalations by US and its allied power structures?
I mean surely nobody is naive enough to believe that literal psychopaths like Cotton are interested in truth? Surely we all understand that the only people with real power who are pushing for a China investigation are trying to engineer aggressions, right?
That does not come anywhere remotely close to answering a single one of my questions. Come on guys. At least try to look like you're trying.
Again, dodging every single one of my questions, just like everyone else in this thread. Yet I'm the one burying their head in the sand?
Who is "we"? Who SPECIFICALLY do you imagine is going to be obtaining this truth for you? Are you planning on going to the lab yourself? Explain to me how specifically you imagine this happening in a way that yields truth instead of lies and more cold war.
AGAIN: Who is "we"? Who is going to be leading this investigation? What institutions will be overseeing this, and in what possible scenario could they be guaranteed to be objective? It's clear that nobody's thinking very hard about this.
AGAIN: Who SPECIFICALLY will be responsible for obtaining and publishing that "understanding"? Under what possible scenario could anyone be assured that their findings would be unmanipulated by the power structures pushing for this inquiry?
AGAIN: Who SPECIFICALLY will be responsible for overseeing that "understanding"? Who SPECIFICALLY will be responsible for making sure they "don't get a pass"? Why are every single one of you dodging 100% of my very simple questions?
What "international experts"? Under what organizing body? Tell me SPECIFICALLY who this would be, and how we could trust that their findings wouldn't be manipulated by the US power alliance a la OPCW investigations etc.
Yeah it's pretty clear that nobody's thinking very hard about this.
It's a generic summary of sentiments I've been hearing ever since the Covid lab leak hypothesis went mainstream.
No one. That's my whole point: there's no mechanism in place for conducting such an investigation that won't be subjected to the most high-octane narrative management imaginable, and I can't think of any way you could create one. Apparently no one can.
Then it's a safe bet we'd never hear about it, if the organizing body conducting this hypothetical inquiry is subject to the influence of the US power alliance. And I can't imagine any scenario where it wouldn't be.
It's clear nobody has an answer to my questions. In summary, there is no international mechanism which could oversee such an investigation fairly. The US dominates all such international investigative bodies, which is why Bush and Cheney aren't rotting in a cell at The Hague.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

9 Jun
Learn enough about what's happening in the world and you realize that most people in your society have worldviews that are completely and utterly wrong. This can seem bold, perhaps even arrogant, but if most people weren't deluded about the world, the world wouldn't be so fucked.
And it's not that people are dumb; intelligence has little to do with it. Some of the most intelligent people on earth promote the same deluded worldviews as everyone else. The problem isn't intellect, it's manipulation, and anyone can be manipulated no matter how smart they are.
This mass-scale manipulation is the result of wealthy people buying up narrative influence in the form of media, political influence, think tanks, lobbying, etc, in conjunction with the mass-scale manipulations of the powerful government agencies which are allied with them.
Read 6 tweets
8 Jun
Tom Cotton Explains Why Warmongers Love The Wuhan Lab Leak Theory

"Not everyone who supports an investigation into the lab leak theory is a warmonger, but warmongers will definitely be happy if they get that investigation."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/tom-cotton-e…
At a recent appearance on Sunday Night in America, Senator Tom Cotton took a break from masturbating to drone bombing footage to explain why he and his fellow psychopathic warmongers love the hypothesis that Covid-19 originated in a Chinese laboratory.
Here's a transcript of Cotton's comments.
Read 23 tweets
6 Jun
Media Converges On The Narrative That UFOs May Be Russian/Chinese Threat

"Whenever you see the imperial media converge to this extent upon a single narrative, that's the Official Narrative of the empire. We can expect to see more of this going forward."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/media-conver…
So in case you missed it, it's been pretty thoroughly confirmed that the UFO report won't contain any revelations or any confirmation of ET origin, but it will absolutely 100% contain fearmongering that UFOs could mean the US is falling behind Russia and China in the arms race. Image
This narrative was then picked up by cable news, with MSNBC inviting former CIA director and defense secretary Leon Panetta on to explain to their audience that the US government should assume UFOs are Russian or Chinese in origin until that possibility has been exhausted. Image
Read 6 tweets
5 Jun
The entire mass media is converging on the narrative that UFOs are evidence that the US may have fallen dangerously far behind Russia and China in military technology.
MSNBC has former CIA Director Leon Panetta on to explain to its audience that we should assume UFOs are Russian or Chinese aircraft until proven otherwise.
The only new MSM segment I've seen today which didn't promote this narrative was a new interview with Lue Elizondo, who seems to be going out of his way to say that it's NOT Russia or China on Tucker Carlson (who has been shrilly yelling that it could be).
Read 5 tweets
4 Jun
This is my first time engaging UFO Twitter, and it's been interesting. A lot of well-intentioned people believe this latest UFO narrative may yield more than new cold war escalations, and I think that's mistaken. The US war machine isn't going to suddenly embrace transparency.
There's a common belief in the UFO community that this "disclosure" stuff is the result of popular demand combined with a few rogue white hats inside the national security state, which on paper closely resembles the QAnon narrative. It just doesn't work that way, folks.
In order for public pressure to work, it needs to have some kind of leverage. The public has no leverage or influence over the US war machine to get it to disclose its UFO information. It follows then that this isn't coming out due to popular demand, but for some other reason.
Read 8 tweets
4 Jun
MSM Wastes No Time Using Senate UFO Report To Promote Arms Race

"The New York Times has published an article on the contents of the hotly anticipated US government report on UFOs, as per usual based on statements of anonymous officials"
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/msm-wastes-n…
.@nytimes has published an article on the contents of the hotly anticipated US government report on UFOs, as per usual based on statements of anonymous officials, and as per usual promoting narratives that are convenient for imperialists and war profiteers
archive.is/YGsBx
Oh well if the US government has ruled out secret US government weaponry programs, hot damn that's good enough for me. Great journalism you guys.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(