1/4
This strikes me mostly as an ideological string of empty cliches that doesn't really mean much one way or the other, although proposing that government spending must be bad because China does it is an argument even a high-school debater would probably avoid.
This strikes me mostly as an ideological string of empty cliches that doesn't really mean much one way or the other, although proposing that government spending must be bad because China does it is an argument even a high-school debater would probably avoid.
https://twitter.com/HerfYamaya/status/1402062908691988480
2/4
For one thing, we were doing it long before they were, and very successfully. He is also just flat out wrong in claiming that government support for scientific and technological research necessarily crowds out private-sector support.
For one thing, we were doing it long before they were, and very successfully. He is also just flat out wrong in claiming that government support for scientific and technological research necessarily crowds out private-sector support.
3/4
This may have been true in some limited cases, but it has more often been the case that it has spurred rather than repressed a private-sector response, and some of the private sector's greatest successes in research and development — the internet, computers, airplanes, jet...
This may have been true in some limited cases, but it has more often been the case that it has spurred rather than repressed a private-sector response, and some of the private sector's greatest successes in research and development — the internet, computers, airplanes, jet...
4/4
engines, agricultural productivity, etc. — were in fact built on the back of government-based advances.
engines, agricultural productivity, etc. — were in fact built on the back of government-based advances.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
