1/9
Very good article by Alexandra Stevenson (@jotted), @KeithBradsher and @caocli on the conundrum Beijing faces with Huarong. Huarong is a balance-sheet mess, and this has been widely known for many years, so it was never really a surprise that it...

nytimes.com/2021/05/18/bus…
2/9
would eventually run into payment difficulties. In the past, however, because MoF owns over 60% of Huarong, Chinese banks and bond investors always refinanced the company's debt on the assumption that the government would support its credit.
3/9
In recent years however the regulators – extremely worried by China's weak lending discipline, and eager to bring the country's debt burden under control – have been trying to convince creditors that they could no longer count...
4/9
on government support hazard, and when rumors spread last month that Huarong was facing payment difficulties, the regulators kept very conspicuously silent. The inevitable result was a bond-market panic that threatened to get out of control.
5/9
So, as this article makes very clear, the regulators face the same problem they have faced for years. On the one hand they cannot directly or indirectly bail out Huarong without reinforcing moral hazard and yet again rewarding investors for ignoring market discipline.
6/9
On the other hand they cannot walk away from Huarong without destabilizing China’s financial markets and perhaps setting off a self-reinforcing sequence of defaults.

In the past they have always chosen stability over efficiency, and they will probably do the same again.
7/9
But I would add something that most other analysts have failed fully to recognize, and that is how little room the regulators have to decide. As long as Beijing insists on GDP growth rates that exceed the underlying economy’s real capacity, there is no way...
8/9
Beijing can prevent bad debt from rising sharply. If banks and investors are forced to operate under hard budget constraints, however, it will be impossible for local governments to fund the activity needed to achieve the GDP growth targets.

ft.com/content/907740…
9/9
Moral hazard, in other words, isn’t some unfortunate characteristic of China’s financial system that can be fixed with the right policies. It is fundamental to the way Beijing’s growth model works. Beijing must backstop the credit markets until it gives up targeting growth.
As expected, while the regulators continue pretending to look away, Huarong is coming up with the funds needed to repay its debts.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

17 May
1/4
This story doesn't change much, does it? Real estate prices in China's 70 largest cities rose month on month by 0.48% in April, after rising 0.41% in March. This is an annualized 5.9% for April and 5.5% for the past two months.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/4
With deposits at 0.35%, and government bonds yielding between 2.6-3.2% (1-year to 10-year), even low rental yields of roughly 2% make buying an apartment seem a good investment. Beijing has been growling about surging real estate prices for years, and more than...
3/4
ever recently, even threatening a real estate tax, but until regulators implement sharper-toothed measures — which of course if credible will almost certainly cause prices to fall — there is little they can do to prevent ever more speculation in Chinese real estate.
Read 4 tweets
14 May
1/10
This is the argument that Yu Yongding and a few others have been making, but I don't think that this is what most economic policymakers and policy advisors believe. In a recent debate Yu described his view as a minority view.
2/10
As for “Consumption is never a source of growth", I think the claim can be made that it isn't a direct source of growth, and certainly not in the way Beijing has always thought about growth, but it is consumption (foreign or domestic) that justifies business...
3/10
investment, even if one can pretend that more consumption isn't needed to justify property and infrastructure investment, and in China it is the latter two that is largely unproductive and causes the surge in debt.
Read 12 tweets
13 May
1/5
A moderate increase in China's CPI inflation would in some ways be a good sign because it would suggest that consumption was rising faster than production, which might in turn imply a rebalancing of income towards middle-class households and workers.

scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/5
But it would leave the PBoC with a difficult policy choice. If the PBoC were to prevent interest rates from rising in line with the increase in inflation, it would in effect be engineering an income transfer from ordinary households (by reducing the value of their...
3/5
savings) to banks or to borrowers, i.e. businesses and government entities. This would not only reverse the rebalancing process, but by lowering the real cost of borrowing it would encourage more rising debt, asset-price bubbles, and the further misallocation of investment.
Read 5 tweets
12 May
1/4
“If the goal was to reduce imports from China then it succeeded,” said Craig Allen, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, which represents U.S. companies do business in China. “But if the goal was...
wsj.com/articles/u-s-t…
2/4
to increase manufacturing employment in the United States I don’t see any evidence that that’s happened. If the goal was to increase imports from other countries in Asia or increase manufacturing employment in Vietnam, it’s succeeded.”

carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
3/4
This was always inevitable. In a globalized world in which transportation costs are low and the cost of capital transfers nearly zero, US tariffs on specific Chinese goods can at best shift trade imbalances around. Their impact on the overall US trade deficit or the...
Read 4 tweets
12 May
1/4
According to this WSJ article: "Large card issuers...say that overall card balances—and thus the firms’ interest income—are falling. To make up for it, issuers are spending more on marketing and loosening their underwriting standards."

wsj.com/articles/credi…
2/4
This reinforces one of the points that@M_C_Klein and I make in our book. Contrary to popular opinion — even among economists who really should know better — a country's savings rate isn't determined by that country's moral values, or its cultural...

yalebooks.yale.edu/book/978030024…
3/4
attitudes towards thrift, but depends rather on structural reasons, among the most important of which are bank lending standards. Because in every country there is a wide range among households of attitudes towards risk and thrift, the amount of consumer credit depends...
Read 4 tweets
12 May
1/5
Jiangsu province, the largest local government bond issuer, has issued rules restricting new debt issuance by local government financing vehicles: "For highly leveraged LGFVs with poor performance, debt increases must be approved by ...

caixinglobal.com/2021-05-12/jia…
2/5
investors, according to guidance issued earlier this month by the provincial government. LGFVs with good financial results and low debt ratios can still increase operational debt by a certain amount."
3/5
What does this mean? Only one or some combination of three things: the locus of future borrowing will shift from insolvent LGFVs to healthy ones, until they too are unable to meet the new criteria; local governments will discover or invent new ways (often hidden) of...
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(