A court has granted Fulton County DA Fani Willis' motion to recuse her office from prosecuting Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe in the killing of Rayshard Brooks last summer.
The Georgia Attorney General will now appoint a new prosecutor to the case. ajc.com/news/crime/jud…
It is now almost a year to the date that Mr. Brooks was killed.
Rolfe has not even been indicted in the killing and has been reinstated to the police force.
Willis argued that her office had a conflict of interest because her predecessor used video of Mr. Brooks's killing in reelection campaign.
It's so depressing/telling to think there has been so little movement in this case, which was such a catalyst for the racial justice movement last summer.
It feels like as with so many cases that for a moment seen to generate outrage - I think most often of Daniel Prude - it could easily disappear from the public consciousness, without anyone being held accountable, and no one would so much as blink.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
SCOTUS says it's unconstitutional to execute someone who is intellectually disabled. Prosecutors argue Black people score lower on IQ tests because they are biased, so they INFLATE their scores, making them eligible for the death penalty.
The courts use a threshold of 70 to decide whether someone is intellectually disabled. A Black person who scores just under 70, will have their score artificially inflated - in what's called an "ethnic adjustment. nytimes.com/2021/01/11/opi…
A White person who scores just under 70 will not have their score adjusted. So they will be ruled intellectually disabled.
Daniel Pantaleo didn't get away with killing Eric Garner because there wasn't legislation in place to hold him accountable, but because the Staten Island DA deliberately didn't present a strong case to the grand jury.
Tish James herself could have indicted the cops who killed Daniel Prude under current legislation, but she chose to put on witnesses who argued the cops who killed him were justified.
She didn't want to get an indictment.
New legislation is not needed to hold cops accountable.
If prosecutors want to get indictments they can do it now. They're the ones who need to be held accountable for choosing not to do that.
It's interesting the way people think when prosecutors are presenting cases against cops to a grand jury, they're meant to present all the evidence good and bad.
I promise you this is *not* what they do when they present against ordinary people. They try to get an indictment.
The only duty a prosecutor has is not to mislead a grand jury and to present what would be described as exculpatory evidence. For instance, if a defendant had a credible alibi a prosecutor would have to inform the grand jury.
But presenting a state witness who argues that the defendant was justified in killing someone, no. Absolutely not. Never ever.
People celebrating @NewYorkStateAG's proposed legislation that supposedly makes it easier to prosecute cops, should remember James presented the case against the cops who killed Daniel Prude to a grand jury, but also called an expert who testified that the killing was justified.
In that case, AG James claimed that she presented the strongest possible case to the grand jury in an attempt to indict the police officers, but she called Dr. Gary Vilke as the state's expert witness and he concluded that the cops were not responsible for Mr. Prude's death.
He concluded that Mr. Prude died due to "excited delirium." This is a diagnosis that is not recognized by the American Medical Association or American Psychiatric Association and is used to justify police violence against Black and Brown people. brookings.edu/blog/how-we-ri…
Today @AP published video that shows LA police killing Ronald Greene in May 2019.
Police told Mr. Greene's family he died in a car accident.
In fact, they choked, beat, kicked & tased him as they dragged him face-down along the road.apnews.com/article/us-new…
As in the case of Andrew Brown, the state refused to released bodycam footage of the murder, and only showed it to the family months after the killing.
When police took Mr. Greene to the hospital after he died, they told the emergency room doctor he had been in a fight after the car accident, but the doctor found taser prongs still in his back. apnews.com/article/louisi…
This is wild. Dude is regularly on CNN talking about how he has rejected the legacy of Robert E. Lee to become a symbol of racial reconciliation. Turns out it's all a grift.
I mean dude is convincing. I heard him and thought, wow this is kinda cool. And this is his website.
When you do look at his website tho, the grift is kinda apparent - I thought he was just a pastor, turns out he's written three books. So there's that.