D Dimer: A test that leads nowhere?

25% of 150 recovered COVID-19 patients had elevated D Dimer at 4 months. 81 were outpatients.

The exact role of D-dimer in COVID-19 is unclear; it does NOT predict PE unless there are concomitant clinical clues.

1/10

healio.com/news/hematolog…
Traditionally D-dimer is elevated when there are fibrin degradation products associated with clots. But D dimer is also elevated in other inflammatory conditions, trauma, post-op state / malignancy.

In COVID-19, its role is primarily as a marker of severity & inflammation.
2/10
Studies in COVID-19 patients have shown that unless there are specific clinical pointers to a clot (leg or lung), an elevated D-dimer value ALONE will not be worth pursuing: we might end up chasing a bird that was never there.

3/10
This study proves exactly that. In many COVID-19 patients, D-dimer is simply a marker of the ongoing inflammation, rather than the signal of a "hidden clot somewhere".

For that reason, it is unwise to depend on an isolated D-dimer value alone to decide on anticoagulation.

4/10
It is also observed that among patients who are admitted to hospital with COVID-19, an elevated D dimer at admission has predictive or prognostic value.

The obvious question comes up now:

How good is the link between PE (pulmonary embolism) and D dimer?

5/10
The relationship is interesting, and invokes the concept of PPV (positive predictive value). In someone with high pretest probability of PE, a high D dimer will help in the diagnosis.

This is called PPV. That is the ability of a positive test to predict the disease.

6/10
In other words, in this context PPV means, out of a 100 positive D dimer tests, how many had PE?

PPV is different from sensitivity - ability of a test to turn positive when done on a diseased person. That is, out of 100 people with PE, how many can the Ddimer test pick up?

7/10
PPV is not fixed - for any test. It varies depending on the clinical setting.

It is like saying, if you hear someone knocking on your door at 9 in the morning, it is likely to be someone you need to meet. But if the same knock occurs at 3 AM, it probably means trouble.

8/10
Likewise, the same test could mean different things depending on the context it was ordered in. In summary, a high D dimer value alone may not mean anything in a COVID patient who is otherwise doing well.

Often, it is good to leave well enough alone.

Linking my article.

9/10
Knowledge of biostatistics is essential in healthcare.

Attaching my article from 3 years ago, written in the context of the tread mill test (TMT) & heart disease, but as an easy teaching example of interpreting the fundamentals of ordering tests.

10/10

onmanorama.com/lifestyle/heal…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rajeev Jayadevan

Rajeev Jayadevan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RajeevJayadevan

10 Jun
Covaxin tested against two variants B.1.617.2 (India) & B.1.351 (S Africa). Mild reduction in neutralization ability noted; 2.7 and 3-fold, which is a smaller loss compared to other vaccines, reports ICMR/NIV study.
See graph for comparison.
Thread.
1/n biorxiv.org/content/10.110… Image
Neutralizing ability is one of the parameters scientists use to measure a vaccine's firepower against a virus.

If the vaccine is very effective, then its ability will be 1 or close to 1 -that is, in comparison with how effective the same vaccine was against the old virus.

2/12
If the virus has become so smart, it will then take several times the original "neutralising power" to kill it.

e.g. If the amount of vaccine required to kill the new variant is 10 times what it took to kill the old virus, we say the neutralising ability is 10-fold lower.

3/12
Read 14 tweets
9 Jun
Cell-to-cell (sideways) transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is described in this research from Ohio State Univ & Washington Univ.

Authors find this process, unlike the traditional 'cell-top entry', is not deterred by neutralizing antibodies.

1/n

biorxiv.org/content/10.110… Image
Traditionally we hear about virus entering the exposed surface of the cell, like a bug flying in through the open window of a multi-apartment complex.

Now, imagine this bug burrowing through the walls into all the neighboring units. That essentially is cell-to-cell entry.

2/4
The problem with this process is that our neutralising antibodies might not be able to stop it.

These antibodies are designed to stop the bug from entering through the window, but not from burrowing through the walls between adjacent apartments.

3/4
Read 5 tweets
9 Jun
ICMR-NIV study on P.2, the variant originally found in Brazil since ~April 2020 (WHO). Also called B.1.1.28.2 or zeta, it is now being rapidly replaced by P.1 in Brazil.

ICMR/NIV observed its effects on hamsters in comparison with P.1.

See thread
1/13

biorxiv.org/content/10.110… Image
Presenting some context first. This variant P.2 was only seen in 2 samples so far in India; from asymptomatic travelers who arrived from Brazil and UK.

In Brazil, it is also being phased out by P.1 (deeper colour in recent weeks of 2021, genomic data from Manaus, Brazil).

2/13 ImageImage
Study from Brazil showing how P.2 is being phased out by P.1. The latter variant has the N501Y mutation in addition to E484K, among several others.

3/13

virological.org/t/increasing-f…
Read 14 tweets
6 Jun
Evidence based medicine, finally.

The latest COVID-19 guideline from Directorate General of Health Services at Ministry of Health & Family Welfare @MoHFW_INDIA, are pristine no-nonsense science.

✅ NO UNNECESSARY MEDICATIONS. Period.

See thread.

1/5

dghs.gov.in/content/1376_3…
Major features:

1. Bold and clear statement about asymptomatic infection:

“NO MEDICINES REQUIRED”

2. No antibiotics

3. No place for HCQ, Zinc, Vitamins, Ivermectin on the document

4. Clear instructions on steroid dose. One dose, fixed duration.

2/5
5. No steam inhalation advised (people sometimes do this in excess).

6. Hydration, diet and positive mindset/social connections get attention.

7. Clear instructions on Remdesivir and Tocilizumab, these are to be carefully used - only in highly selected patients.

3/5
Read 6 tweets
6 Jun
Comparison of antibody response between covishield & covaxin by @singhak_endo & team.

515 subjects, of whom 90 got covaxin

95% overall anti Spike antibody response

98% for covishield, 80% for covaxin

Lower response in older people & diabetes

🧵

1/5

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Cont’d

Antibody titre 115 AU/ml for Covishield and 51 for covaxin.

27 breakthrough infections occurred (4.9%) after both doses: 25 were mild, 2 were moderate, no deaths.

Risk of breakthrough infection:
5.5% with covishield
2.2% with covaxin

2/5
Listing some facts which will help understand the context of the study:

1. Anti Spike antibody is not the same as neutralising antibody. Its level is not known to reliably correlate with NAb, which is typically measured only in research labs. See my earlier tweet on this.

3/5
Read 7 tweets
6 Jun
Apparent increase in % of deaths among 30-44 years in Himachal Pradesh from 7% in 1st wave to 13% in 2nd.

On taking a closer look, (see thread) it is likely because the older age groups have come under vaccination umbrella.

1/4

m.tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/…
As early as May 31, over 31% of >45 years age group in HP had been vaccinated, ranking first in the country.

This means that the death rates in the older age group will be lower.

Therefore, the % of deaths in <45 will appear larger.

See below.

2/4

tribuneindia.com/news/himachal/…
(Continued, see thread above)

The shaded (green) parts are the vaccine-protected segment. (A few <45 also got vaccine, but mainly in healthcare/frontline worker groups).

If vaccination had not been done, the 2nd wave numbers in the shaded areas would have been higher.

3/4
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(