Are Dems arguing it's OK to commit extortion, bribery & obstruction of justice if it helps advance their worldview?
Or does the partisanship of America mean a fraudster can just invoke some ideological tribe+gain allies who won't bother to learn facts?
dailywire.com/news/dems-help…
Or does the partisanship of America mean a fraudster can just invoke some ideological tribe+gain allies who won't bother to learn facts?
dailywire.com/news/dems-help…
Basically this case comes down to:
> Oil companies like Chevron are bad
>> OK, but in this instance, you totally fabricated all the evidence against them in a brazen shakedown attempt and relied on bribed a judge to make your case
> Why are you siding with someone bad!?
> Oil companies like Chevron are bad
>> OK, but in this instance, you totally fabricated all the evidence against them in a brazen shakedown attempt and relied on bribed a judge to make your case
> Why are you siding with someone bad!?
It's a clear attempt to politicize the judiciary, where someone's culpability rests not on whether they actually did something, but on whether they're popular under identity politics, etc.
That's a pretty frightening road to go down.
That's a pretty frightening road to go down.
Sure, US courts found that the 'human rights' lawyer ghost-wrote an "expert's" report finding pollution, and promised a foreign judge a $500k kickback for a pollution ruling.
But AOC tells Garland: it “involved urgent environmental justice concerns of Indigenous people”!
But AOC tells Garland: it “involved urgent environmental justice concerns of Indigenous people”!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
