2. Equating every power difference with domination, & denying the basic distinction b/w just & unjust power differences.
But we all know parent/child, coach/athlete, & teacher/student relations are essentially unlike master/slave, colonizer/colonized, & tyrant/serf relations. 2/
3. Reification, moralization, & weaponization of hierarchical identity categories, & denial of individuality & agency.
But we all know people are individuals & should be treated as such, not as tokens of some type, reduced & conformed to group identity. 3/
That’s the ideology.
There are true believers, but none who believe it consistently. No one can.
It’s unlivable.
It’s a pose. A self-image & self-deception.
Berlatsky doesn't call CPS on himself.
Those who rant loudest about 'white men' often go home to white husbands. 4/
Above all, it's a weapon.
Whether borne of seething resentment, frustrated mediocrity, utopian cosplay, or real grievance, it's for seeking & wielding power, getting the upper hand, ruining 'enemies.'
It's not about mutuality or truth.
And it's certainly not about justice. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ideological orthodoxy & viewpoint discrimination are two sides of one coin.
It's embarrassing, but many administrators & faculty don't get this - or pretend not to.
🧵1/
Faculty condemn viewpoint discrimination against an NHJ, even as their own departments issue partisan statements on contested ethical & political issues.
Such institutional statements establish a clear ideological orthodoxy.
It's the very essence of viewpoint discrimination! 2/
Partisan institutional statements on contested ethics & politics betray the university's mission.
They subordinate truth to power, inquiry to conformity.
They substitute a narrow, contested vision of justice for pursuit of truth, including truth about what counts as justice. 3/
We are witnessing the rebirth of the most vile & damaging racist ideas of the early modern era by ideologues who claim, like their forebears, to bring 'enlightenment.'
Here is *extremely* toxic & vile racism from Kant.
Brace yourselves - it's incredibly offensive. 🧵1/
For Kant & his ilk, 'the white race' was the bastion of reason, objectivity, scientific & mathematical thinking, discipline, literacy, & hard work.
In sum, all qualities deemed necessary & good for human flourishing, social & scientific progress, freedom, & self-rule. 2/
They viciously claimed that 'the black race' was the opposite: lazy, irrational, unintelligent, incapable of abstract thought.
Claiming that race determined human capacities, they put Blacks at the bottom of a scale with Whites on top. 3/