Yet Another Media Tale -- Trump Tear-Gassed Protesters For a Church Photo Op -- Collapses

greenwald.substack.com/p/yet-another-…
That Park Police violently cleared Lafayette Park at Trump's behest was treated as unquestioned truth by corporate media.

Today it was revealed by the independent IG Report to be an utter falsehood. Watch how readily and easily they spread lies. From CNN on June 1:
The IG's Report could not be clearer: the media narrative was false from start to finish.

Plans to clear the Park were made before anyone knew Trump was coming. Some journalists, like @MZHemingway, said this at the time, but were "debunked" and declared liars by "fact-checkers."
The IG is long-time respected DC official from the Obama years.

Yet again, the corporate media outlets that most loudly and shrilly denounce "disinformation" -- to the point of demanding censorship in its name -- got caught spreading outright falsehoods for week with no dissent.
It is hard to count how many times they have spread major fake stories in the Trump years. They have nobody but themselves to blame for the utter collapse in trust by the public, which has *rightfully* concluded they cannot and should not be believed.

greenwald.substack.com/p/yet-another-…
The IG who issued this report is a DC official from the *Obama years.* He obtained proof showing the decision to clear the Park was made well before Trump decided to go to the Church.

Liberals still refuse to believe it because they adore corporate media & want to be lied to.
The reason the IG report is persuasive isn't because the IG said so and therefore you should trust him. That's how liberals reason.

The reason it's persuasive is the *proof* is presented in documentary form, which you can evaluate, and when you do, you'll see it's conclusive.
Over and over and over, the media corporations that claim to oppose "disinformation" spread it more aggressively and destructive than anyone. Anyone who still trusts them is irrational. They threw away every last standard in the name of stopping Trump:

The IG Report is unusual in that it uses clear, definitive language: tear-gassing of Park protesters had nothing to do with Trump, with ample evidence.

Some outlets (like the WP) are largely admitting this, while others just refuse to accept the truth:

washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/06…
My expectations of liberals are extremely low (!), but their abject refusal to accept that this did not happen -- despite the mountain of conclusive documentary evidence presented by the IG -- is surprising even me. News outlets are coming clean:

Here's CNN's legal analyst pretending that the IG Report vindicates the falsehoods they spread, even as almost every other media outlet (and the IG) admits it negates it. These people are pathological liars and disinformation agents. Look at this shit:

Compare the claim of that CNN disinformation agent above about the IG Report to what the Report actually concluded, to see how readily and constantly they lie.
This video is so hilarious. Obviously, NBC was among the leaders pushing the false claim Trump tear-gassed protesters for a photo op.

The problem: Ken Dilanian read the IG Report & knows it's not true. Chuck Todd does everything to salvage it, but can't:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

11 Jun
Trump DOJ Obtained Data on Schiff and Swalwell, Two Long-Time Champions of Domestic Spying

greenwald.substack.com/p/trump-doj-ob…
The two California Democrats join the long list of politicians who enable spying on ordinary citizens, then protest when they are targeted.

In 2018, they played a key role in joining the Paul-Ryan-led, pro-spying wing of the GOP to block @justinamash's domestic spying reforms.
The Obama & Trump DOJ spied on journalists for leak investigations, while the Biden DOJ protected it. Targeting members of Congress merits an investigation. Time will tell if this was an abuse.

But few people have less credibility to object than Schiff and Swalwell. ImageImage
Read 8 tweets
11 Jun
Eight years ago today, we unveiled one of this generation's most important and courageous whistleblowers: Edward @Snowden. Rather than hide, he voluntarily stepped forward to explain why he risked his liberty to reveal illegal NSA spying on US citizens:

theguardian.com/world/2013/jun…
As the @ACLU put it in urging his pardon, "Snowden blew the whistle on illegal government activity kept secret for years. Our democracy is better off because of him."

The programs he revealed have been declared unconstitutional by US & EU courts.

One overlooked aspect of the Snowden reporting was how it completely evaded dreary partisan divisions. In addition to the ACLU & NYT, Snowden is supported by Rand Paul and other GOP privacy advocates. This was the first major politician to defend him:

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 5 tweets
10 Jun
There's a good reason Joe Scarborough is the anchor of the liberal-left's favorite cable outlet. Shown a *mountain of conclusive, documentary proof* that the Park Police's use of tear gas had nothing to do with Trump - was planned well before - he still insists it happened:
This IG report is as credible as it gets. From a career civil servant with key positions in the Obama Admin, it assembled a huge amount of proof & was *harshly critical* of the Park Police's use of force.

Yet because people need the media tale that Trump did it, they ignore it.
The liberal-left's other favorite outlet, CNN, took the lead in spreading the original falsehood. So rather than just admit they got the story wrong -- which they unquestionably did -- CNN employees like @Acosta keep encouraging their viewers to believe:

Read 11 tweets
9 Jun
Beyond the dangerous arrogance and pomposity of proclaiming "anyone who criticizes me is attacking Science" -- thus placing himself off-limits from questioning -- he *admitted* he purposely issued false, anti-science, politicized claims, such as telling people not to wear masks:
Fauci also admitted he purposely issued inaccurate claims about herd immunity for political reasons.

Once you *admit* that you made false statements in violation of The Science™, you don't then get to equate yourself to The Science™ such that attacks on you are attacks on it.
I Am The Science.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jun
Two years ago today, we began our Secret Brazil Archive exposé by publishing 3 separate articles -- in Portuguese and English -- revealing severe corruption by Brazil's top judicial and prosecutorial officials, along with an Editor's Note explaining it:

theintercept.com/2019/06/09/bra…
During that 2 years, Lula was released from prison, his convictions were nullified and his political rights restored, a major press freedom ruling was issued by the Supreme Court protecting the reporters, attempts to prosecute were defeated & @SF_Moro went from icon to disgraced.
Yet it was revealed just yesterday that a pro-Bolsonaro police official who has been criminally investigating journalists and activists -- including Globo's @realwbonner & @felipeneto -- summoned @TheInterceptBr's executive editor, @demori, for criminal inquiry for his reporting.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jun
LOL. This is such a lie. The clip was originally posted by @tomselliott and he purposely posted the entire clip of Maya Gay's comments from the first word to the last: 2 minutes, 34 seconds of it. It's fine to agree with what she said but nobody distorted anything.
See for yourself. I posted this yesterday emphasizing that @tomselliott, as he usually does, went out of his way not to select excerpts but to post the whole answer:

The popular liberals who are defending Maya Gay's comments understood her point exactly the same way as her critics did. There was nothing unclear about what she said. The NYT just lacks the courage to defend the comments so is pretending her point was misconstrued.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(