Here's a breakdown of the nutrient density rating by nutrient
Top iron sources:
•Organs (liver, spleen, kidney, heart)
•Small dried fish
•Bivalves (clams, mussels, oysters)
•Beef/goat
•Pulses (beans, peas, lentils)
•Traditional grains (fonio, teff, millet, sorghum)
Nutrient density rating
Very high: provides an average of 1/3 of recommended intakes with ≤ 1/6 of both energy & mass recommended intakes (assuming an energy density of 1.3 kcal/g)
High: provides an average of 1/3 of recommended intakes with ≤ 1/3 of both energy & mass recommended intakes & with < 16.7% of either energy or mass recommended intakes (assuming an energy density of 1.3 kcal/g)
Moderate: provides an average of 1/3 of recommended intakes with 1/3–1/6 of both energy & mass recommended intakes (assuming an energy density of 1.3 kcal/g)
Low: provides an average of 1/3 of recommended intakes with > 1/3 of either energy or mass recommended intakes
For milk, the thresholds are based exclusively on energy, since it's easier to consumer larger quantities of liquids than foods
This analysis focuses on density in 6 micronutrients, and not essential fats or amino acids. As with all foods, those with high nutrient density may carry risks for non-communicable diseases, depending on the quantity, total diet and individual. Environmental impact not assessed.
Optimal sources of iron, zinc, calcium, folate, vitamin A & B12 are organs, small dried fish, cheese, beef/goat, eggs & dark leafy greens
Shows grams & kcals needed to provide 1/3 of recommended intakes for pregnant women
Nutrient density rating is preliminary & explained below
Foods with optimal nutrient density provide an average of 33.3% of recommended intakes with ≤ 16.7% of both energy (2,583 kcal) and mass (1987 g) recommended intakes (assuming an energy density of 1.3 kcal/g).
Foods with high nutrient density provide an average of 33.3% of recommended intakes with ≤ 33.3% of both energy and mass recommended intakes and with < 16.7% of either energy or mass recommended intakes.
Love Kevin’s advice at the end: love each other, exercise, and limit ultra-processed foods sigmanutrition.com/episode376/
Important distinctions between the two groups in this study: the low-carb diet had nearly double the energy density (2.1 v 1.1), lower fiber (9 g v 31 g), & a higher proportion of energy from ultra-processed foods (32% v 26%) compared with the low-fat diet.nature.com/articles/s4159…
Yet both groups lost weight, & there was no significant differences in weight loss or fat loss between the two groups. So I think most people could maintain a healthy body weight on a variety of macronutrient ratios, animal-to-plant-source food ratios, & diets. Diet quality key.