Here is why cities around the world should build 2 km high quality, segregated cycling lane per 1000 inhabitants (thread β¬) π²β
To avert catastrophic climate change and limit warming to 1.5Β°C we need to reduce carbon emissions from transport drastically. In fact transport is the problem child of carbon emissions. In many countries transport
emissions are rising while all other emissions are falling. 2/n
Cycling π² is (almost) zero emission already, together with walking πΆββοΈπΆββοΈand public transport π it can be a great contributor to lower carbon emissions π³. 3/n
H/T @LHInnovationHub
However, there is a big barrier to increasing cycling and getting more people to use their bikes: road safety. Cyclist fatalities have been decreasing eight times more slowly than deaths of motor vehicle occupants. 4/n
H/T: @ETSC_EU
Letβs take the best as example: The Netherlands π³π±.
Some 35,000 km of cycle-track has been physically segregated from motor traffic, equal to 1/4 of the country's entire 140,000 km road network; this enables an incredible high cycling modal share. 6/n
H/T: opencyclemap.org
π²π³Quality counts: The backbone is a country-wide
network of segregated, high-quality cycling lanes with a minimum width of 2.5m per direction, clear signage,
weather resilient design, that provides continuous
connections, etc. Smaller streets are designed with low speeds. 7/n
To achieve a quality network π²such as the Netherlandβs, governments should build roughly 2km of segregated high quality cycling lanes per 1000 inhabitants. This cycling quality indicator obviously does depend on local topography and population density. 8/n
2km / 1000 inh. equals 16 000 000 km worldwide. Do you think this is exaggerated ? Figures for road networks vary widely, the 64 million km from Wikipedia seem reasonable. Why should the
most sustainable mode of transport (cycling π²) get less? 9/n
π² Further considerations:
β’ Large cities can make a "development contribution"
to the hinterland for long-distance commuting, and
to areas where city dwellers relax.
β’ Pursue multi-year planning
β’ No new road or rehabilitation without high quality cycling infrastructure. 10/n
πThe New Normal: Public Transport ππππ in a #COVID19 world. Collecting guidelines, case studies, campaigns β an incomplete thread, feel free to join the debate. Thread β¬οΈ.
#summerofcycling goes on:
πPop-up bike lanes are the new kids on the block. π΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈπ΄ββοΈ
An incomplete summary. Thread β¬οΈ.
cont'd: Pop-up bike lanes (or emergency bike lanes) are temporary cycling infrastructure to help cyclists to maintain spatial distance to minimise the risk of infection and relieve public transport. @Felix_Weisbrich on #TUMITV about the concept:
cont'd: Cycling superhighways are premium end of cycling market, allowing for higher travel speeds and extending the range of bicycles to longer distances with average speed of 20 km/h (design speed of 30 km/h) by limiting gradients, width of >4m , priority at intersections, ...