One of Maya Forstater's lawyers, @peter_daly, on @amnesty , the @fawcettsociety, the organised Trade Union movement, the political parties: "All have ignored these women, or been positively hostile"
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
Maya Forstater's lawyer:
"Amnesty Ireland went furthest of all by putting its name to a statement calling for people with Gender Critical beliefs to be “denied legitimate political representation”. Even typing that sentence feels implausible."
"Amnesty Ireland went furthest of all by putting its name to a statement calling for people with Gender Critical beliefs to be “denied legitimate political representation”. Even typing that sentence feels implausible."
Maya Forstater's lawyer says in the light of today's judgment, @theSNP need to review their proposed hate crime legislation, and national police forces need to stand down from thought policing.
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
Maya Forstater's lawyer says that in the light of today's judgment, the Office for National Statistics @ONS need to review fundamental priniciples, social media needs to stop censoring gender-critical views, and education authorities need to stop indoctrinating children.
Maya Forstater's lawyer says that in the light of today's judgment, the right of lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people to affirm their sexuality as being sex-based is protected.
"For Gender Critical gays & lesbians, the insistence of homosexuality as same-gender attraction can be seen as unvarnished, base homophobia of the type that even five years ago was thought defeated, except within the most reactionary and bigoted corners of society."
Maya Forstater's lawyer says today's judgment upholds the right of LGB people to organize:
"There is an urgent need now to question the wisdom of grouping all LGBT people together as a homogenous single group, classified and defined solely by reference to Gender Theory."
"There is an urgent need now to question the wisdom of grouping all LGBT people together as a homogenous single group, classified and defined solely by reference to Gender Theory."
Maya Forstater's lawyer says today's judgment means organizations need to question their performative waving of novelty Pride flags.
"There is no sense at all in adopting exclusionary iconography in the name of inclusion."
"There is no sense at all in adopting exclusionary iconography in the name of inclusion."
There are many other excellent points raised in @peter_daly's commentary to today's judgment in the Maya Forstater case.
Well worth a read:
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
Well worth a read:
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
Oh, an important one!
Maya Forstater's lawyer on pronouns:
"Policies which demand the mandatory insertion of pronouns in email footers... may be evidence of the hostile environment described at s.26(1)(b) Equality Act 2010..."
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
Maya Forstater's lawyer on pronouns:
"Policies which demand the mandatory insertion of pronouns in email footers... may be evidence of the hostile environment described at s.26(1)(b) Equality Act 2010..."
linkedin.com/pulse/forstate…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
