Good question! It's different for every client that embeds appellate counsel, but I've done two for the same client and this is what I do. /1
Appellate counsel is attached when a case is set for trial and looks like it's actually going to go. My first order of business is to prepare motions in limine and argue them before trial. I also attend the pre-trial conference. /2
At trial, preservation is priorities 1-6. If I do nothing else, it's making sure we say "objection" when necessary to preserve the record. If the judge allows, I will argue sidebars. If not, I am whispering in examining counsel's ear. /3
I will also argue any legal issues that need to be handled outside the presence of the jury, like complicated evidentiary issues not covered in the motions in limine. /4
I'm responsible for the "appellate" trial report which is keeping a running list of potential appellate issues and anything the court needs argued the next day. In state court, things are almost always argued orally, so it's not usually brief writing, but is sometime. /5
After each trial day, I'm pulling transcript bits and outlining the motion for judgment as a matter of law. Again, in state court, it's usually oral, but you still need to be prepared. I also prepare draft jury instructions and verdict sheet and argue the charge conference. /6
And then when the jury is sent out, I argue any responses to jury questions and make sure the jury doesn't return an inconsistent verdict and is properly polled before being discharged. /7
It's an exhausting job! You show up early to prep for the court day, spend all day in court, and then work after the court day. But it's very rewarding. Trial teams appreciate focusing on the witnesses and documents, and you learn a lot about what it's like in the trenches. /8
And have new empathy for "why did they argue it like that?" uncharitable thoughts you used to have when reading a cold transcript. It's hard being on your feet, tracking a million issues, even when that's your only job! /9
It's hard being on trial and I wouldn't want to be a full-time trial lawyer (I miss my kids like crazy), but I am glad it's part of my practice. /Fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Marotta

Sean Marotta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @smmarotta

10 Nov 20
As outside counsel for @AHAhospitals, I will be live tweeting the #SCOTUS oral argument and providing analysis starting at 10 a.m. today. Opinions are mine. Read my earlier piece on their blog:
aha.org/news/blog/2020…. 1/
After the Chief Justice calls the case, we'll hear from Michael Mongan, the Solicitor General of California, who represents the coalition of States defending the ACA. He'll start with two minutes uninterrupted for an opening statement. 2/
Mongan's opening statement defends the constitutionality of the individual mandate with a $0 penalty, but also shifts to "severability" - whether the rest of the ACA can stand even if the mandate is unconstitutional. /3
Read 72 tweets
5 Jun 20
I talk about this question a lot when doing panels on social media. There are no good answers, but I think it's useful to tease apart a few different kinds of "sail trimming." /1
Some sail trimming is needed as either an ethical or good-partnership practice. For instance, when you work in a firm (esp. a big one), what you publish or say in your professional role is often constrained by who the firm represents, even if you don't know them. /2
I've had to spike or reel in views just because some other partner or partner's client justly would not want a fellow attorney from the firm that represents it saying X. You can quit, of course, but I'm talking about smaller issue commitments here. /3
Read 5 tweets
24 Nov 18
So here's a boring procedural take on these petitions while you enjoy your leftovers. /1
The government says that it needs certiorari before judgment because without it, review would not take place until October Term 2019. /2
But here's the thing: To secure review /this/ Term the petition will need to be fully briefed and submitted to the Court by mid-January. Currently, the briefs in oppositions are due on December 24, 2018. /3
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(