1/ Bitcoin is a powerful tool for human rights.

What is happening in El Salvador will have a huge impact on the lives of people there and across the world.

A nation adopting Bitcoin is a big step forward for global human freedom.

But that's not the full story 🧵
2/ It is important to separate appreciation for this historic milestone, and celebration for the march of open source technology, with any such appreciation or worship of the president of El Salvador.

In Bitcoin we don't trust, we verify. That approach is needed more than ever.
3/ Today I spoke to a Salvadoran lawyer and law school teacher. She is representative of many Salvadorans, living in the capital with family in the country.

Many of her students do not have internet access. The last year has been very hard on them.
4/ She is not against Bitcoin the technology, but she *is* against the way the bill is being abruptly introduced into the country, and has fears over new powers the govt may gain.

I felt like it was important to share her perspective with you all here for ongoing discussion.
5/ Please note: many, or possibly most, Salvadorans disagree with her about President Bukele.

Including several that I have talked to personally.

Bukele is very popular. Many support the Bitcoin bill.

Do your own research.
6/ Our friend has received death threats from congressmen in Bukele's party, so I will not be using her real name here.

We'll call her Ana.
7/ Ana's two main questions:

I) How can we, Salvadorans, learn about Bitcoin? The government has said nothing about the details. No one, she says, knows anything. She says the spaces event was the first time Bukele spoke publicly about it, and has not spoken to the people since.
8/

II) How do we know that the government won't be stealing or committing money laundering with its Bitcoin?

Last year, Bukele famously sent troops to the parliament to force them to sign off on a $100M bill to expand the security state. Photo here.

npr.org/2020/02/10/804…
9/ She says that no one knows how they spent the money.

Likewise, the country took on nearly $400M from the IMF to fight COVID, and she says the public doesn't know how they spent this money.

So they are concerned about the use of any new Bitcoin funds.

imf.org/en/News/Articl…
10/ She also warns that Bukele will do anything for more power.

Between 2012 and 2017, he served as mayor in two cities for the Socialist-Leftist FMLN party.

In 2017, he was expelled from the party. He says it's because he was rooting out corruption.
11/ The party says it was because he was causing internal strife and in particular, because he got in an altercation with a female colleague.

He later launched his centrist party, Nuevas Ideas, and used a smaller politically-right party GANA as a vessel to run for the presidency
12/ In 2019, he became the first post-war president to win outside of the two-party system.

This is significant, as the two main parties are extremely corrupt. But, Ana says, Bukele has done very little to reduce corruption amongst his own allies.
13/ Bukele recently sacked 5 of 15 Supreme Court judges and the attorney general, removing checks on his power.

We have the eternal conundrum: was it to root out corruption, or to go after opponents? Ana says it's the latter. Others say it's the former.

usnews.com/news/best-coun…
14/ A major issue in El Salvador is violence against women. Ana points to a mass grave uncovered recently with up to 40 women in it. She thinks the Bitcoin Bill is a way of distracting from the investigation, where the main suspect is a former cop:

apnews.com/article/el-sal…
15/ When women get disappeared, raped, or killed in El Salvador, there is very rarely any punishment.

She is worried that this will continue under Bukele's administration and that he's not shown an interest in reforming the police forces.
16/ Again, she herself has received death threats from members of Bukele's party in congress.

They have told her to stay silent, or else they will find a way to silence her. She fears that her voice will get her killed, especially since these congressmen have immunity.
17/ This much is certain: Bukele is an incredible politician. She says he knows how to read people.

He has the Clinton/Obama talent of making it seem like you are important and doing things that the public likes.

Look at the way he has played to Bitcoiners' interests online.
18/ But Ana's fear is that he will become another Hugo Chávez. That he cares not about ideology (having gone Left to Right) but about power.

The big test will be in a few years -- will he use his supermajority to try to change the rules and run for a second term?
19/ For now, Ana's main concern is transparency.

The people don't understand what Bitcoin is or what Bukele is talking about with volcanoes. They don't know where the money will go.

There should be more communication, more dialogue.
20/ Everyone has a political agenda. The truth is usually somewhere in the middle between two sides.

Either way, we should be asking hard questions and keeping Bukele as honest as possible. Let him prove his claims through actions.
21/ 80% of Salvadorans don't speak English. What can we do to ensure that they have access to information about what is happening?

We can share info in Spanish on how Bitcoin works, how to use non-custodial wallets, how to use Lightning, and how to use multi-sig, for starters.
22/ The situation is nuanced.

Does Bukele deserve credit for the choice to use Bitcoin? Absolutely.

He could have chosen to ban Bitcoin, to go with a China coin, or a surveillance CBDC.

Instead he went with a money that he cannot control. This *action* is to be celebrated.
23/ The geopolitical context is also important.

In an age of dollar hegemony and Washington Consensus, Bitcoin could be a powerful force to help smaller nations gain more autonomy.

And BTC is an infinitely better "independence" rallying cry and uniting message than communism
24/ No one can predict the future.

Bitcoin can change people.

Maybe Bukele will be the reformer he says he will be. Maybe he will increase transparency over national finances.

But he should have to earn that acknowledgement over time from us.
25/ In the meantime, I will do what I can to help spread the word about Bitcoin as a tool of empowerment in El Salvador and in every other country worldwide.

Ultimately, Bitcoin will work against authoritarianism.

But in the meantime, let us push back against it, everywhere.
26/ It’s worth noting that my new friend is excited about Bitcoin. I have a call with her soon to teach her more about it and show her how to set up a wallet so she can learn and share with her students and family and friends.

Remember: Bitcoin is for everyone!
27/ The work @Bitcoinbeach + @ln_strike have done is amazing. They have sparked a financial revolution.

On Bitcoin’s journey it will co-opt many leaders. But remember Bitcoin exists to *separate* money from state.

As we liberate the former, let’s remain cautious of the latter.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Gladstein 🌋

Alex Gladstein 🌋 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gladstein

26 May
1/ My latest essay is live:

"The Humanitarian and Environmental Case for Bitcoin"

Could Bitcoin reduce "middleman" corruption in aid, bootstrap electrification via untapped renewables, and help developing nations end dependency on foreign powers?

🧵

bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/bitcoi…
2/ Helping those less fortunate is noble.

Since the 1960s, more than $4 trillion has been sent from rich countries to poor countries in what is now a $200 billion foreign aid industry.

But does humanitarianism sometimes help create the hardship it is supposed to solve?
3/ Three of aid's major flaws:

-Much of it is skimmed off along the way, or ends up propping up dictators
-Aid creates dependency + discourages economic independence
-Donors rarely help nations become *energy* independent, as renewable farms aren't quickly sustainable/profitable
Read 22 tweets
17 May
1/ **A World Without Bitcoin**

What would the future look like if Satoshi had never invented decentralized digital scarcity?

If we didn't have open-source, non-discriminatory money beyond the control of corps and govts?

Here's a sci-fi look into that parallel universe 🧵:
2/ The year is 2040, and cash is gone. The money you use on a daily basis has fully transitioned into a tool of surveillance and control.

In midtown Manhattan, you tip sidewalk performers with a scan of your wearable, your face, or your fingerprint.
3/ Coins and dollar bills are now curiosities—fossils from a forgotten age.

In Beijing, the government-issued Yuan has long since been digitized into the ubiquitous DCEP.
Read 44 tweets
5 May
1/ It is *really important* to understand that Bitcoin is very different from Dogecoin.

Some are making jokes comparing the two, especially as Doge has outperformed BTC + ETH this year.

Many of you already know, but for everyone else, here are some of the key differences 🧵
2/ Bitcoin is absolutely scarce. There will never be more than 21 million Bitcoin.

Dogecoin is infinite. The system is on track to mint 14.4 million new Doge each day and 5.2 billion more Doge each year, forever.
3/ Bitcoin’s issuance is predictable. The users, who are self-interested to preserve the system, control the rules.

Dogecoin’s issuance is unpredictable. It can and has been altered. For example, in 2014 the creators simply changed the monetary policy from finite to infinite.
Read 19 tweets
30 Apr
1/ While doing research for my essay on the negative externalities of the petrodollar, I learned a huge amount. Much of it was shocking or surprising.

Here's a thread with a few of my favorite bits of insight, with links for further reading 🧵

bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/the-hi…
2/ The Vietnam war was the first American war fought almost entirely on credit.

Previous wars were financed significantly by higher taxes:

jstor.org/stable/2950852…
3/ In 1971 the French were so worried that the dollar would devalue as a result of exorbitant American spending on war and social programs that they sent a battleship to New York City to collect their gold.

A few days later, Nixon closed the gold window:

scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Read 19 tweets
30 Mar
1/ In a new @Telegraph column @jamestitcomb claims that it is "hard to argue that Bitcoin has lived up to its mysterious inventor’s early intentions as a world-changing financial protocol" and says the main outcome has been making "a small number wealthy"

🧵 on why he is wrong:
2/ To be fair, it is easy to arrive at this conclusion if you completely ignore (as Mr. Titcomb does) how people are creatively using BTC worldwide.

If you only read buzzy US headlines about Tesla + NFTs, you'll miss the big picture. I hope journalists are willing to dig deeper
3/ A lower-bound estimate of unique Bitcoin users based on exchange data (excluding p2p activity) is ~130M people. Many of these millions are in emerging markets. For example there are 1.3M users of one Bitcoin trading platform alone (@Paxful) in Nigeria:

Read 23 tweets
29 Mar
Important to keep in mind:

Bitcoin's Proof-of-Work was invented to escape Proof-of-Stake financial systems, where the largest asset owners can unduly influence the rules of the game.

Thanks to PoW + full nodes, neither miners nor the biggest BTC hodlers can change the protocol.
In the coming year, we will see many people increasingly try to argue that Bitcoin should shift to Proof-of-Stake for various reasons.

This would defeat the entire purpose of Bitcoin.
Most recently, @Noahpinion argued that Bitcoin should move to Proof-of-Stake in Bloomberg.

By doing so he demonstrates that he does not understand how or why Bitcoin work.

@nic__carter did a great job dismantling his argument here:

medium.com/@nic__carter/n…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(