I promised earlier to translate most of Alexei Sobchenko, Victor Suvorov and Mark Solonin talk on what happened on the 13th of June 1941. It will take several threads and I am not sure when I will finish but today seems to be a good time to start.
Sobchenko: The subject of our meeting is the 13 June 1941. Victor Suvorov, please explain why we are discussing the 14 of June and not 19th or 14th.
Suvorov: Under Stalin the history of WWII was not written.
The war ends, all archives get closed, and the war is presented as a collection of certain heroic deeds, how 28 Panfilov’s Guardsmen stopped, at first they stopped, at first they wanted, if 28 then it means 56 tanks but the chief editor of “Red Star” got rid of 2 tanks,
so 28 Panfilov’s guards stopped 54 German tanks. They stopped these tanks and all died. Then the number was reduced and reduced and now it has become 18 tanks. From where did they take this. number 18 tanks? Well, they divided 54 by 3.
In addition we had Alexander Matrosov, who threw himself on a machine gun, the hero of Krasnodon, and finally Egorov and Kantariya hoisted the red flag over the Reichstag.
This was the history of the war. Generals, admirals and marshals were officially forbidden to write war memoirs. History of the war does not exist, and there are no memoirs.
And then comrade Stalin left this world and it was immediately followed by a fight for power, and they kill Beria, and then to the top rise Khrushchev and Zhukov,
Krushch was also a kind of beetle ("zhuk" means beatle), so two beetles rise and they decide after all to write the history of the war, that is, that Stalin was stupid but two great men, Khrushchev and Zhukov made up for it.
But soon Khrushchev got rid of Zhukov and now they begin to write a 6 volume history in which, of course, Krushchev is on all the most important fronts, he rallies the troops, sends them into battle and points the direction.
And this was being prepared for the 20th anniversary of the victory.
The first volume came out in 1961 and the second also in 1961 and all 6 were supposed to appear by the 20-th anniversary of the victory.
But Khrushchev never saw it as they deposed in in 1964. Before that, there was the 20th Congress in 1956, officially to approve the 6th 5-year plan, which was approved, they would have approved it anyway without the Congress,
but in reality they called this Congress in order to expose the crimes of Stalin. And they exposed a lot. When the Congress was finished, the guests returned home, but all the Soviet delegates were ordered to remain.
Oficially the Congress was over but they all met and comrade Khrushchev read his famous speech, in which he told a lot bad things about comrade Stalin, including about his most idiotic conduct in the last months and weeks and days before the German invasion.
Khrushchev reminded everyone something that was forbidden under Stalin, that is, on the 14th of June 1941 there appeared a statement by TASS that Germany abides as strictly as the Soviet Union by the terms of the Soviet-German non-aggression pact and that the rumours about
approaching invasion by Germany against the Soviet Union are clumsy propaganda manufactured by forces hostile to the Soviet Union and Germany, who want to cause a quarrel between them.
The 20th Congress applauded the words of comrade Khrushchev and from this time it became customary to lough at this TASS statement and its author. The point is only one person could give an order to publish a statement that Germany has no desire to attack the USSR.
Sobchenko: In the entire Soviet history it never happened that the Soviet Union announced that America does not wish to attack us or…
Solonin: loughs.
A personal comment from me: we actually had the Polish translation of those two published volumes of the history of WWII in my home in Poland and I remember reading them sometime in the 1960s. I think Khrushchev was still in power, so I must have been 10 years old. I remember
talking to my father about it, who laughed at this. I remember that this was the first time I read about the catastrophic Soviet defeat at Kharkiv (one of Manstein's masterpieces). According to the history Khrushchev guessed everything and tried to warn Timoshenko but for some
reason, which I can't remember anymore, either because of Stalin or Timoshenko, he was ignored. My father only loughed and call the whole book a pack of lies. He remembered the Kharkiv disaster still from the war and that's how I knew about it. It was never mentioned before this
book was published and neither afterwards, so probably Khrushchev had some reason to bring it back, and Brezhnev, who in subsequent Soviet accounts won WWII single-handedly had no such reason.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

12 Jun
Thera are probably mote Sputnik enthusiasts in Slovakia than in Russia
itself. I’m fact, not only did Putin himself refuse his vaccination to be shown publicly in any form but his spokesman refused to say which vaccine was used. The question why is quite interesting. One thing
we know it was not Sputnik Lite (which is just the first dose of Sputnik masquerading as an independent single dose vaccine), not the EpiVac Corona of the Vector Research Center (the former military biowarfare lab, infamous for accidents in which some of its scientists & at least
100 persons died & which probably caused the 1977 worldwide Russian flu pandemic), because that is also a single dose vaccine & certainly not the Chumakov Center’s Covivac, which was not yet in use when Putin got his first dose. So if it was a Russian vaccine, it must have been
Read 5 tweets
5 Jun
Yulia Latynina has now produced the second part of her very extensive and detailed analysis of the Smolensk air crash in response to Mark Solonin’s three youtube videos and it’s an enormously impressive work.
It is amazing that anyone could do so much research in such a short time (I intended to try something similar but gave myself until the beginning of next academic year - that is, until October to do it).
But I have to admit that she has essentially convinced me and I no longer feel compelled to try to do so. It’s incredible that someone who is a “just a philologist” (as she keeps describing herself) could do so much highly technical work, in which actually she seems
Read 41 tweets
4 Jun
Lukashenko is not openly displaying a political prisoner in public forced to make Stalin style public confessions, praise the Great Leader and beg for mercy. But comparisons with Stalin are only very superficial.
The victims of Stalin’s show trials were severely tortured but were never displayed publicly until all the signs of torture had disappeared. Torturers were instructed not to leave visible signs. This time the signs are very visible and it is not an accident.
This is Lukashenko saying to the West: I can will do whatever I like and you can stuff yourself with your talk of human rights - you will do nothing. And they will do nothing although it is a lie that nothing could be done.
Read 10 tweets
2 Jun
The first of two or more threads on the corruption of science. This time: coronavirus.
Now that the one of the greatest cases of politically driven scientific malpractice in history, which I think is a fair way to describe the great “origins of covid-19” coverup, has collapsed, it seems to be a good moment to do some stock taking.
Make no mistake about it, this affair is going to rank along with the Lysenko affair (and the still going on Climate Panic Affair) as one of the most shameful episodes in the history of science, or even the history of human (un)reason (there are indeed also some
Read 34 tweets
1 Jun
Time for another giant thread 😏 @moutet

Nowadays before sleeping I listen to Edward Radzinsky’s YouTube talks. I can’t even begin to describe how interesting and well delivered they are. Radzinsky talks about some of the most tragic and bloody events of history yet often
he seems to have difficulty retrain laughter , especially when he is talking about intellectuals, which he usually is. It just reminds you that human naivety and folly, especially that of intellectuals, no bounds.
When he in one of his talks he mentioned that Stalin had Trotsky’s son executed, he apologised to the viewers: “I am sorry for telling you such obvious things”. Sometimes his voice acquires pathos, he recites great poetry.
Read 45 tweets
30 May
Finally, a fragment about Russia's role (and Biden).
Now there are three small details that I would like to talk about. And the first is, of course, the role of Russia.
Let me remind you that from this plane, which flew from Athens to Vilnius, some other persons got off in Minsk. Obviously they were FSB officers. That is, the operation was obviously supervised not from Belarus, but from Russia.
They were Russian citizens. It would be strange if Russian citizens worked in Lukashenka's KGB.

I think that two things were important here for the Kremlin.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(