One of the many problems feedback groups identified with the curriculum is inconsistency. For example, different terminology is used to refer to the same concept in different grades. It makes it harder to scope & sequence. 1/7
Or, a learning outcome from one grade matches better with a similar learning outcome in a different grade and subject area. Teachers integrate subject matter for more in-depth learning (and it maximizes time!) For example, a science topic might fit in with Social Studies. 2/7
The fact that we have members on the curriculum advisory panel who are apparently just *now* reading other parts of the curriculum that were not their particular interest provides some insight into how these inconsistencies occurred. 3/7
Because the people ‘advising’ are not teachers (or not for decades) and are not curriculum experts, no one caught all of this. Or they just didn’t care. But the people who would have to help our children learn all this see it right away. That’s how teachers think. 4/7
*Some* of the inconsistencies could be ‘fixed’. The language could be made more consistent. The learning outcomes could be swapped from one grade to another. The government is getting a lot of extremely detailed feedback on this. 5/7
Here, for example, is the 174 page feedback document that HUNDREDS of teachers and consultants from Edmonton Catholic Schools worked together to produce. It explains the multiple problems clearly and in detail. 6/7

sbecsdstor.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/…
However, much of the new curriculum (notably, but not only, Social Studies) is just too problematic on too many levels. It must be redone. Yet members of the curriculum advisory panel who have been singing its praises are just *now* getting around to actually reading it? 7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Barbara Larochelle

Barbara Larochelle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarbLarochelle

11 Jun
So if they can't actually get 70% vaccinated before the Stampede, they will count other things. What else will they count? Wrong answers only.
Number of Premier's Pancake Breakfast aprons Kenney ordered times how much his new cowboy boots cost?
$ value of campaign donations UCP will get to make this happen raised to the power of average number of mini donuts in a bag?
Read 4 tweets
29 Apr
The 4 francophone school boards met to discuss the draft curriculum with the education minister. They found the meeting polite but ‘disappointing’ and ‘unsatisfying’. (Paraphrasing) They didn’t feel like she was there to listen and she seemed surprised that they did not want 1/4
to pilot the new curriculum. The francophone representatives didn’t feel like she understood what their education rights are as francophones, while she felt that they the government had taken great steps to satisfy the francophone community. 2/4
They are planning to take a detailed look at the social studies, music and French as a first language programs in particular, and give detailed notes and recommendations on those, which they expect to be taken seriously. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
21 Apr
Joseph Schow is calling a point of order on Rachel Notley for having said that ‘the premier continues to denigrate teachers daily.’ Sarah Hoffman says that she knows thousands of teachers who feel that way. #ableg
She is correct.
Nathan Cooper rules that it is a point of order because it ‘imputes unavowed motives’ to Kenney. What a clown show UCP is. 🤡 They are pathetic.
Now Schow wants to ‘elevate the level of debate in this chamber’ because he finds it ‘despicable’ that Rachel Notley said that Kenney probably doesn’t have a lot of young mothers with children in his circle. Christina Gray apologizes and withdraws.
Read 6 tweets
21 Apr
Searle Turton asks Shandro in the #ableg why are teachers not being prioritized for vaccines? Shandro: ‘We depend on Federal Government for supply.’ We can’t give out doses we do not have. Albertans over 40 can be vaccinated including teachers.
Turton follows up with a question about teachers’ risks and concerns about the variants. The variants can affect younger people and does that not put our teachers at risk?
Shandro says the variants are more dangerous for all Albertans, so they are focusing on more vulnerable Albertans first, and will get to everyone when they have supplies. How totally insulting 😤
Read 4 tweets
21 Apr
🧵 Reasons I think $10/day childcare is a good idea even though my ‘baby’ is 16:
-We never needed to have all 3 kids in childcare at the same time because the 2 oldest were in K-6 by the time the youngest came along. I can’t imagine how we could have afforded it. 1/
-We chose the best childcare we could afford at the time. For the youngest, it was an amazing program, and it was >$800/month (back then!). After our mortgage, it was our biggest expense each month. 2/
-We were so fortunate that his childcare was at the YMCA. An excellent program near our house, with hot meals plus swimming and music lessons, caring instructors, field trips, lots of fun, and he was SO ready for kindergarten. 3/
Read 9 tweets
20 Apr
On Global News just now, Rebecca Schulz with excuses why UCP likely won’t cooperate on federal childcare. They have to “meet the unique needs of Alberta parents”, 60% of Alberta childcare is privately operated, $25/day only helped some, etc. More reason to dump UCP in 2023. 1/3
UCP continues to mislead about the $25/day *pilot* program. It only benefitted 1% of parents because it was a *pilot*. Toews said yesterday, the federal funding ‘lacks flexibility’ and they have to ‘respect parents’ choice’. Lies & excuses. Totally on brand for UCP. 2/3
What it comes down to is that this may be a huge benefit for women and families, but their friends can’t make a profit off of it, so UCP is not interested. 3/3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(