Just over 50 years ago, any state in the US could have (and many did) pass laws that would have deemed our marriage illegal.

npr.org/2021/06/12/100…

I know of Christians who only a few decades ago could not find a church/pastor to officiate their wedding because they were of
different ethnicities (they were in California).

There are still Christians today in the US who hold either horrendously racist views regarding multiethnic marriages or exoticize/fetishize them and their children. I've heard these comments.

The sad tragedy though is the
multitude of White Christians who claimed to believe in the Bible who did absolutely nothing politically, socially, ecclesiastically, or personally to challenge these views and laws in their families, churches, and in society at large. In other words, I would be able to bet money
on the fact that if we turned the time back 50 years, it is likely no one in the pews would have stood up for us and would have deemed it outside of the church's responsibility.

It's important to realize how recent this history is and how personal it is as well.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Timothy Isaiah Cho

Timothy Isaiah Cho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tisaiahcho

14 Jun
Folks aren't really concerned about critical race theory. They're concerned about what the cost of discipleship will require to admit and make amends for the sin of racism. If we take seriously the biblical requirements of repentance and restitution, everything must be redone.
We're living on stolen lands that were taken in the name of Christ's kingdom. We're living in a society whose foundations and economy were laid by free labor at the expense of the dehumanizion of people of African descent. We live in neighborhoods of generational wealth accrued
through the disenfranchisement of people of color from home ownership, assets, wealth, and political power. We attend churches that find their roots in upholding injustices against the image of God and who intentionally kept Christians of color out of their pews, pulpits, and
Read 7 tweets
5 Jun
There are Reformed circles that act as though doctrinal orthodoxy covers over a multitude of sins. While claiming they believe in a "high view" of the ministry of the Word, they believe that an ordained minister who is ungodly and unloving is nevertheless preaching God's Word.
A low bar of ordination (i.e. passing theological examination) is seen as a license to preach and administer the sacraments regardless of whether or not the private life of the minister is in step with the gospel of Jesus Christ. As long as he "preaches the gospel," his "rough
around the edges" parts of him are explained away and excused.

I will say this with the deepest sadness - out of the Reformed ministers I have been in close proximity with in their private and family lives for extended periods of time, I can count less than the fingers on one
Read 8 tweets
5 Jun
It's shameful that in the church, those who want to pursue justice for victims have an ungodly standard placed upon them to be considered trustworthy. One slight misstep, one word said out of turn, one phrase misinterpreted is used as the lynchpin by detractors.
All the while those who are engaging in abuse are given huge leeway for their "indiscretions" and "mistakes," and second chances become fifteenth chances.

We have created and maintain a standard of a perfect victim and a perfect advocate. Instead of recognizing that ongoing
trauma in a victim's life has ongoing repercussions and expressions, we wrongfully chalk them up to be unreliable, untrustworthy, and divisive because they don't fit within the paradigm of perfection. Instead of walking with victims and caring for them as they need, we end up
Read 7 tweets
3 Jun
What's been unveiled about the underbelly of the SBC is just a microcosm of what's going on in many Evangelical denominations and institutions in the U.S.

The question is, are we going to learn? Are we going to dig deeper into what's going on behind the scenes in our circles?
This is not just an SBC problem, and to frame it as such will cause even more harm. Lay people in the pews of Evangelical denominations need to ask their leadership about what's being done to make sure these same things aren't happening in their own denominational circles.
Students at Evangelical seminaries need to ask what kinds of policies are in place to prevent and deal with these kinds of heinous actions and to increase transparency between the leadership and everyone else.
Read 6 tweets
27 May
Cornelius Van Til argued that we don't deal with just bare facts, but we interpret facts based upon our presuppositions. The presuppositional preference of protecting reputation and power have again and again overridden accountability, justice, and protection.
Further, "slander" requires falsehood in order to be slander. People telling their experiences of abuse in the OPC and PCA does not amount to slander in any thoughtful definition of the term. That would be equivalent to calling a whistleblower policy a slander policy.
Even further, your comments and similar comments are exactly why people have not and continue to not come out in public with their stories of abuse in our church circles. They are met with gaslighting, preposterous accusations of "slander" and "insubordination," while the
Read 6 tweets
26 May
It's historically been a minority view to argue that "Junia" was a man (i.e. "Junias"). Ever since the Greek New Testament began using accent marks, it accented the name in such a way that it *had* to be rendered as feminine. It's only in recent history that that's been
challenged.

"Outstanding among the apostles" *can* be rendered "outstanding by the apostles." But, Matt. 2:6 has a parallel construction of en tois when it says "Bethlehem... not least among the rulers of Judah." The similar construction would lead you to exegete it similarly.
There's no exegetical necessity to translate it as "outstanding by," but there is precedent to translate as "outstanding among/within the group of the apostles."

"Apostle" can be used in a less technical sense, like for Barnabas, Timothy, and Silvanus. But, in the NT, it
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(