1 - Actual e-commerce customer data is indicating that the "COVID-bump" is ending.
This creates all sorts of interesting dynamics that are going to play out over the next two years.
2 - Let's pretend that we have a business where the annual repurchase rate is 30%, there are 70 new customers per year, and there were 100 12-month buyers at the start of COVID. Let's assume that each customer spends $100 a year for simplicity sake.
3 - So, at the end of the year just prior to COVID, we had the following situation.
100 buyers.
Rebuy Rate = 30%.
Existing Buyers = 0.30 * 100 = 30.
New Buyers = 70.
Total Buyers = 30 + 70 = 100.
Spend per Customer = $100.
Total Sales = 100 * $100 = $10,000.
4 - Ok, during the COVID year, the following happened.
Rebuy Rates = 35%, not 30%.
New Buyers = 130, not 70.
What did this mean for the brand?
5 -
100 buyers.
Rebuy Rate = 35%.
Existing Buyers = 0.35 * 100 = 35.
New Buyers = 130.
Total Buyers = 35 + 130 = 165.
Spend per Customer = $100.
Total Sales = 165 * $100 = $16,500.
Sales grew 65%.
Weeeeeeeeee!
6 - Ok, now business reverts back to normal.
Do net sales revert back to normal?
No!
7 -
165 buyers.
Rebuy Rate = 30%.
Existing Buyers = 0.30 * 165 = 50.
New Buyers = 70.
Total Buyers = 50 + 70 = 120.
Spend per Customer = $100.
Total Sales = 120 * $100 = $12,000.
8 - The business doesn't stay at $16,500 COVID-inflated net sales dollars.
But the business doesn't go back to $10,000 of normal net sales dollars per year, does it?
You get $12,000 - $10,000 = $2,000 of "compound interest" from the bump in COVID customers.
9 - Every company is going to have to thoroughly understand this dynamic, and will have to quantify it and then buy inventory to this level.
If you don't do this level of work (which is rather simplistic, don't you think?), then you are at risk.
10 - What happens next year?
120 buyers.
Rebuy Rate = 30%.
Existing Buyers = 0.30 * 120 = 36.
New Buyers = 70.
Total Buyers = 36 + 70 = 106.
Spend per Customer = $100.
Total Sales = 106 * $100 = $10,600.
The business reverts closer to normal.
11 - Two years from now?
106 buyers.
Rebuy Rate = 30%.
Existing Buyers = 0.30 * 106 = 32.
New Buyers = 70.
Total Buyers = 32 + 70 = 102.
Spend per Customer = $100.
Total Sales = 102 * $100 = $10,200.
12 - So we have a business with the following dynamics.
Last Year = $10,000.
COVID Year = $16,500.
Next Year = $12,000.
Year Two = $10,600.
This is the impact of the "COVID-bump".
You get the benefit of the bump.
Then you get compound interest at ever-decreasing rates.
13 - The lower your annual repurchase rate (i.e. anything under 40%), the less of a "compound interest" effect you enjoy.
The higher the rate (i.e. above 60%), the greater the impact of the bump over time and the longer the bump lasts into the future.
14 - Show of hands, how many of you understand the math here? (hint - all of you).
Show of hands, how many of your e-commerce brands measure the dynamics illustrated here and then do something about it?
15 - P.S.: This example shows you why Customer Acquisition is so critically important and why Customer Loyalty initiatives are typically feckless. Utterly feckless.
Focus your marketing department on finding new customers ... and never take your foot off the gas pedal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 - I've noticed that too few e-commerce professionals ... and almost no vendors (and it isn't their job to understand this) understand the fact that if few customers repurchase then the entire focus of the marketing department needs to be on customer acquisition.
2 - You'll miss this point if all you ever look at is conversion rates.
3 - Here's an example I just analyzed, with numbers scaled down to be easily understood.
The brand had 100 twelve-month buyers. 25% of those customers bought again in 2018. The brand then generated 70 new+reactivated buyers.
2 - In the 2004-2007 timeframe catalog marketing began the process of "dying".
Now, I'm already bracing myself for the wolves who will come out and say that Amazon sends a catalog and that is proof that catalog marketing is alive and well.
It is not alive and well.
3 - I was invited to speak at a conference in 2007 ... a roundtable discussion on the future of catalog marketing.
It's hard to tell an audience of 300 people that there is no future.
Person told me tonight they called a vacuum cleaner company from a work phone for a repair. This evening, he saw an ad on his home laptop on Facebook for the vacuum cleaner company.
Two things.
1 - This person was not happy that his vacuum cleaner stopped working.
Why this brand thought that an ad on Facebook would help matters is beyond me, but I'm not a digital marketing expert.
2 - Just because you can link/buy/sell information doesn't mean that you should link/buy/sell information.
1 - When you focus on Customer Development, you look for key inflection points that cause customers to become more valuable.
Most companies have a customer rebuy rate table that looks something like this (some better, some worse).
2 - Read down the "Freq = 1" column. This is the probability of a first-time buyer purchasing in the next year, given that the customer hasn't purchased in "x" months (that's the column labeled "Recency").
Tell me what you observe, compared to the other columns?
3 - That column shows us just how unlikely first-time buyers are to purchase again.
This is a credible company with good repurchase rates (overall). But after a first purchase, the customer is not terribly likely to buy again.
The other night on Clubhouse a guy gets invited to speak, and immediately begins the "RETAIL BRANDS ARE STUPID, THEY DON"T TAKE RISKS" mantra that vendor-centric folks leverage to sound like a Thought Leader. Just endless emptiness.
1 - Ok, let me share a story with you along these lines.
I spent one year (2000) working for a company called Avenue A ... one of the early inventors of the retargeting industry.
2 - We served a lot of retail brands, so it didn't surprise me that an employee wanted to spend a few hours learning how retail brands "worked from the inside".