Yesterday, I wrote an article about the progress @POTUS & @VP have made on the int'l front this past week. I observed that it was the result of sound diplomacy, hard work, experience & vision. I immediately got slammed by some folks for suggesting I was being blindly supportive.
That's Twitter, I suppose. I seldom respond to such nonsense. But, in this case, I think it is worth taking a moment to say that the reason I wrote what I did is because...it's true. The past week shows a Biden team that knows what it's doing on foreign policy.
The list of accomplishments is material. Restored relationships with allies. Revitalized commitments to the G7, NATO and our relationship with the EU. A major and meaningful commitment on vaccines for nations in need that led to a G7 wide commitment of 1 billion doses.
A move to refresh the Atlantic Charter. Progress on nettlesome trade deals (like that between Airbus and Boeing.) A vision for NATO that addresses emerging challenges including singling out several from China that were a priority for the Biden team.
Sending a powerful message to Putin even before tomorrow's summit that the western alliance is back, the US is back, that our commitment to the intl system is reaffirmed and that our tolerance for Russian abuses is low (they figure even more prominently in the NATO communique.)
Taking major steps to repair the damage done to the alliance, to key relationships (like those with Germany and the EU), by the previous administration. On the VP's trip to Mexico and Central America she also achieved real concrete progress.
She re-engaged in a constructive way with Mexico after the threats, demagoguery, human rights violations at the border and sheer insanity of the prior administration. She got AMLO to agree to a cabinet level security dialogue that is essential and was by no means assured.
She got the Mexicans to agree to work to help manage the border problem and to assist with our efforts to help address the sources and causes of migrant flows in Central America. She relaunched programs in Central America on those efforts.
She announced new centers for helping to legally process refugees. Real US funding was restored to these issues and they were prioritized once again after critical programs were shut down under the prior administration.
The problems the VP tackled were not easy ones. They have bedeviled every administration in my adult lifetime. The Congress has run from them as if they were radioactive. But @VP and the administration have run straight at them, taken them on despite their political complexity.
The same is certainly true with President Biden's trip to Europe. Trump did huge damage. It won't be fixed overnight.But recent polling data (see the Pew Poll cited in my article) shows leading nation's confidence in Biden as light year's above that for Trump. That's no accident.
They see what is happening. These trips are not photo ops. They are carefully orchestrated involving weeks or months of consultation and negotiations with allies--consultation and negotiation of a type that did not take place for the past four years.
The Biden team did not achieve every goal they set--no administration does. But they achieved most of them and the some total of those achievements, they benefits of methodical, professional blocking and tackling on the diplomatic front is apparent to our allies & adversaries wor
In fact, when taken together with the quality of the team put in place at the outset, they way they have managed the crises they faced from the global COVID crisis to the Israel-Palestinian conflict in recent weeks, from resetting the expectations of China to...
...systematically rejoining the intl system (from agencies like The Who to the Paris Accords to re-engaging in negotiations with Iran), the progress in just five months has been striking--even more so when the heavy lift and the progress at home is taken into consideration.
Priorities have been reset (like placing climate crisis atop our list of global concerns and restoring the international order) and issues have been framed (like the battle between autocracy and democracy at home and abroad.)
This last point illustrates another key point that has not gone unnoticed around the world. This administration is returning to alliances with a keen awareness of our own limitations and missteps at home and abroad. These are not the unilateralists of the Bush era.
These are not the narcissists of the Trump era. And they act with more skill and confidence and clarity of vision than the Obama or Clinton teams certainly did in their first terms in office. None of this is opinion or spin.
The facts are there. This administration, led by the president with the most foreign policy experience of any in modern history, is getting off to a better start than any of its predecessors in the last 30 years. It's not perfect.
We all may have disagreements with them. I personally wish they had done more to stand up for the Palestinian people. I think sometimes the rhetoric around China has been a bit overheated. I have been disappointed the steps to restore democracy through accountability...
at home have not been prioritized as I would like. But, day-by-day, month-by-month, issue-by-issue, the team assembled by @POTUS and @VP and led by people like @SecBlinken and @JakeSullivan46 has not only done remarkably well, they have set a new standard for how to do it right.
It's not flashy. It doesn't take place in the Twitterverse (Trump's Twitter disasters with Mexico and our allies could fill a volume alone). It's just the way professionals do it. The way it is supposed to be done. And I think that's worth celebrating.
Every day we discover the Trump Admin was responsible for even more abuses, even more crimes. Many are unprecedented, mind-boggling in their outrageousness. And yet on the federal level, we never seem to move any closer to holding Trump or those close to him responsible.
For those who consider themselves institutionalists, be clear, the lack of accountability is a cancer on the institutions of our government--the presidency, the Department of Justice, the Congress.
The crimes will not simply go away if we ignore them. They will metastasize. They will become president. What was unthinkable will become acceptable practice. Checks and balances will disappear. Old norms will be forgotten. We will become more lawless and less democratic.
Immigration on our southern border is a complex problem that's been with us for decades. No one has managed it well. The Congress has made matters more difficult resisting immigration reform. That's why it was an act of leadership and courage for @VP to take it on.
The VP's trip to Mexico and Guatemala involved delicate and emotionally fraught issues. Her focus was on having the US play a more active role in helping our neighbors address the root causes of immigration--especially important after the Trump admin rejected such a role.
She made substantial commitments to help in this area--through aid and loans. Her comment that immigrants from Guatemala should not come to the US was the only comment she could have given and any alternative she might have offered would also have generated substantial criticism.
This is a stunning display of intellectual dishonesty. It serially suggests equivalency between those who oppose Israel's policy and those who espouse hate, implies a tie between those with rational critiques and those with irrational hostility. nytimes.com/2021/05/24/opi…
It suggests that criticism of Israel is due to anti-semitism if critics somehow fail in those criticisms to denounce every other act of wrong-doing on the planet at the same time. And of course, it suggests that anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism simply because...
...some anti-Semites also frame their repulsive hatred in criticisms of Israel. It is a classic example of dishonest argument, contortionist in the way it twists and weaves half-truths, distortions and sophistry into what appears to be an argument but is really a tantrum.
In an effort to combat the "four legs good, two legs bad" oversimplifications that dominate the commentary on the Israel-Palestine conflict, here are some thoughts that I find perfectly easy to keep in my mind simultaneously...
1. Israel is a powerful state that has systematically deprived Palestinians of their most basic human rights, seized their land, and imposed new laws and policies that are the immediate cause for the current conflict. 2. Hamas is a terrorist group sponsored by Iran.
3. Israeli political leaders knew that if they continued with their land confiscations in an effort to pander to far right groups they would trigger a backlash from Palestinians & they invited it in an effort to strength the political position of Primer Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
GOP has a mantra that one reason they still back Trump is that he is such a great vote getter. Setting aside the fact that he lost the popular vote twice, he also got a lower percentage of the popular vote in 2016 than Mitt Romney got four years earlier.
Trump's 2016 vote total was roughly the same as George W. Bush's 2004 vote total. Trump's 2016 popular vote percentage was the lowest by a winning candidate in nearly 25 years (Bill Clinton's was lower but that was the race in which Perot won a big chunk of votes as 3d party.)
Well, what about 2020 you say? Well, Trump's popular vote percentage in 2020 was nearly the same as in 2016. GOP talk about the fact Trump won over big vote total in 2020 but percentage of turnout is what matters especially since polarizing Trump also drove anti-Trump turnout.
Today, the House GOP will demonstrate that they're the Trumpiest, Trumpmost, Trumptastic, Trumpelstilskinish, Trumpcentric, Trumpdillyicious, Trumptheistic, Trumpers ever. They'll declare to all that they place their allegiance to one man ahead of the truth & the Constitution.
They'll make a statement that says, "We're 100% behind the sedition, the violence, the attacks on police, the 30,000 lies, the corruption, the racism, the sex abuse, the betraying the country, the attacks on democracy, and the obstruction and perversion of justice of our man."
They will go on the record saying, "We place our man, our cult, our fealty to a serial criminal ahead of our oaths of office, our constituents and our country." Four and a half months after January 6th, they will make it clear that they stand with those who attacked the Capitol.