Focusing on valuation is one of them. But you have to be really:
* Smart
* Willing to put in lots of work
* Aware of what market is doing daily
My approach:
I PAY ZERO ATTENTION TO VALUATION.
It's worked. The proof & thinking 👇
What I look for are ANTIFRAGILE companies.
They all:
* Use the Barbell Method (Mission, Moat, Optionality)
* Have Financial Fortitude (Balance Sheet, no Concentration)
* Have Skin in the Game (Founder, Ownership, Glassdoor)
If they have these 3, I don't worry about valuation
The basic idea:
When chaos hits, ppl in real world don't care about valuation of a stock.
* Schools: $ZM will help us with COVID (no one cares about stock price)
* Citizens: Our police need to use $AXON (no one cares about stock price).
Some real examples from my port
1/
On March 31, 2010, I first bought $AMZN.
P/E = 59
P/S = 2.3
Verdict: OVER-VALUED
Returns since then: 2,400%
2/
On May 21, 2012, I first bought shares of $MELI.
P/E = 41
P/FCF = 46
P/S = 10
Verdict: OVER-VALUED
Returns since then: 1,800%
3/
On January 6, 2014, I first bought shares of $VEEV
P/E = 449
P/S = 23
(Not FCF positive)
Verdict: WILDLY OVER-VALUED
Returns since then: 770%
4/ On February 1, 2017, I first bought shares of $SHOP
P/S = 11
No earnings
No free cash flow
Verdict = OVERVALUED
Returns since then = 2,500%
5/
On September 1, 2019, I first bought shares of $CRWD
P/S = 40
No earnings
No free cash flow
Verdict = CRAZY, INSANE OVER-VALUED
Returns since then: 176% (less than 2 years)
Does that mean all my picks have been great?
HELL NO!
Consider some of my biggest losses while developing this framework:
$BITA lost 63%
$ZUO lost 58%
$PD lost 71%
I could have avoided those by focusing on valuation ALONGSIDE anti-fragility.
But then I would have lost out on all those winners.
Think about it. A single investment in $SHOP cancels out those three losing picks many times over.
Focusing solely on ANTIFRAGILITY makes investing:
Less time consuming for me⏲️
Helps me sleep better at night 🛌
Get better returns 📈
Last week, I talked about the Antifragile Framework for investing.
The biggest question, by far: What about VALUATION?
It's not in the framework.
But before I explain why, there are 6 things you need to know about ANTIFRAGILITY and PREDICTING the future. A 🧵
1/
We often take what's recently happened, and project that into the future without end.
That makes sense. 99.9% of the time, you'll be right.
The same was true for our ancestors. NOT doing this would have led to extinction as hunter-gatherers
2/
But 0.1% of the time, you'll be wrong. (Black Swans)
Imagine how WRONG your predictions would've been on:
* October 23, 1929 (Black Thursday)
* December 6, 1945 (Pearl Harbor)
* Summer 1990 (Fall of USSR)
* September 10, 2001 (9/11)
* New Year's Day 2020 (COVID)
1/ This is a stretch, but it's something I keep coming back to when brilliant (@nntaleb) and popular (@sapinker) collide. The recent @WSJ piece does a brilliant job of highlighting the difference between *Skepticism* and *Enlightenment*.
2/ In the end, @yhazony isn't saying we should shun all "progress", but that we need to move slowly, and locally, to make sure that we don't cause *more* damage in our pursuit of *progress* because we don't fully understand the benefits of traditions.
3/ Reminds me of re-telling of Adam and Eve in @_Daniel_Quinn's Ishmael.
The context: Narrator believes agriculture ushered in a new way of living. It pitted Modern (Agricultural) humans against indigenous peoples.
In effect: The Bible = Story to justify agriculture