There's many non-factual elements here as @sarayupani has pointed out, & many lazy assumptions as @Shehla_Rashid's brave timeline shows.
But it is clear that there r several folks who think this way. So here's my two cents on this phenomenon of privileged Hindu savior complex.
When a person or a group around us is being oppressed, most of us speak out and protest not to do THEM a favor, but bcz we find the act of oppression abhorrent & an assault on basic human values. We r sending a message more to the oppressor than the oppressed..
Yes it's imp for the oppressed to know they're not alone, but it is also imp for the oppressor to know that they ARE alone, that we do not support their actions and ideas. And in that sense, when we privileged speak up (whether for Muslims or other oppressed groups)...
...we actually do a big favor to ourselves in d first place. Oppressors with power r serial bigots, & if one crime goes unpunished they go ahead wit one more & then yet another, & it isnt long before they'r oppressing most of us. So we'r basically working to protect ourselves too
Also imp to remember that support for the oppressed is a solidarity based on universal, basic human values, & not on any special ideal characteristics of the oppressed. This support, therefore, depends more on the context & less on the groups or persons involved..
Thus, the oppressed in one setting can be oppressors in another. I will, eg, oppose the targeting of Indian dalits or christians by a US-based NRI sanghi, but if the same NRI is manhandled by d US police here, my solidarity will without doubt be with that oppressed NRI.
Not bcz i like them or identify with them, but bcz i think that is my responsibility as a member of the human community (the community to which ppl ideally should show their greatest allegiance, much ahead of religion & nationality).
Besides, I find police brutality abhorrent, wheth in the US or in India. I wud better like me & my loved ones to live in a society where such oppression is not normalized or encouraged, or considered "too political" & thus implicitly allowed to happen. So i'll always call it out.
So speakin out against sanghis when they oppress muslims doesnt need to be bragged about. Lets do it bcz those ideas & actions violate basic human values, & not as a favor to any1. Same applies to callin out bigoted muslims who also violate such values. Many are doin that too.
In the end, would like to draw people's attention to this response by Sarayu Pani, which corrects some of the highly erroneous and problematic assumptions some people have on these issues
An awesome pleasure of reading academic scholarship is that we begin to look at things we previously thought we knew well, in totally new and different ways. One of many such enlightening instances for me was reading Venera R. Khalikova's 2017 article on Ramdev. (1/n)
There is a lot of excellent research in the article, and i will focus only on a few points from it. As we all know, Ramdev began as a Yoga guru. Khalikova says that India has had many yoga gurus in the past who have done much to bring yoga to the ordinary Indian (and foreigner)..
.."but Ramdev’s success in reaching out to large audiences is truly unprecedented because it is based on the spread of mass media and the growing availability of communication technologies since India’s economic liberalisation."
The venerable @OmairTAhmad, in a recent thread, perfectly analyzd differential attitudes of privileged Indians to Covid in 2020 & 21
To his point that India mishandled d first, but it was largely d poor who paid d price, "so u didn't care," here's some some public health history
Ppl seem to think that now that the problematic situation of our healthcare is out ther for every1 to see, the elites & ruling classes will take health reform seriously.
However, there rarely is a “trickle-up” of activist sentiments and intellectual rationale into elite circles.
Most privileged Indians indeed r furious wit whats happening. But for many, this anger springs from the individually-oriented PEEVE that healthcare is too pricey &/or inaccessible for them, & not the universally oriented PRINCIPLE tht everyone deserves quality and affordable care
Came across two imp articles explaining in detail how Modi & his cronies have completely messed up the best chance Indian people had against Covid - vaccination.
Ppl still seem to not realize how big & serious this f*ck-up is, but when they do, hope they also realize this:
When Congress proposed the idea of the welfarist NYAY, ppl mercilessly mocked them. But it was a bold political move. Clearly if UPA wer in power today, vaccines wudv been centrally procured, free, & walk-ins allowed
Boldness needs to b in d direction of welfare, not destruction
When we talk about BJP & modi's obsession with perceptions & the accompanying propaganda, let's also remember that this propaganda works in the reverse way too: muddying the perception of opposition parties, esp Congress. Many hav fallen prey to that, & it's high time we realized
Ther hav been a lot of tweets on this in the past few days. Wheth we call it Indian Medical Service #IMS or All India Health cadre #AIHC etc, looks like ppl think that having doctors in charge of medical decisions is the need of the hour.
I even came across a little meme showing Anthony Fauci on one side, with his plethora of medical degrees, & the dull Lav Agarwal on the other, with (the meme said) a B. Tech degree. This obv makes for a compelling argument, esp for young medicos.
There's a lot to be unpacked here, and I think will be in the coming days by many others. Here r my two cents:
A 'Harvard study' says that "Yogi's UP" was "heaven on earth" for migrants.
Over d last few days, we have been seeing such headlines all over Indian media.
But there's a catch: None of these reports mentions the authors' names, the study's title, & where to find d actual study
Harvard Univ already has a lot of baggage, recently in terms of many graduates workin for d Trump admin.. I m sure they do not want to extend this baggage to hateful, divisive, violent regimes elsewher. The content of d news reports makes it clear that if such a Harvard study..
.. exists, it wasn't primarily done for academic reasons.
Or maybe it was, in which case it would be really great if @Harvard or @HarvardChanSPH make sure that the study is made publicly available so that other experts can assess how valid its observations & conclusions are.
A while back I saw a v good article on healthcare in India mention that Ayurveda goes back to "more than 5000 years." Like so many origin stories around the world, those of Ayurveda have also acquired many mythical elements (like the above) over the centuries. Hence this PSA...
When it comes to Indian history, we tragically lack what's called "critical thinking skills" (or in common parlance, "logic and common sense"). In the late 1800s and early 1900s, Sanskritist Ramakrishna Bhandarkar urged us to work on such mental skills: thewire.in/history/grand-…
Keeping that in mind, let me intro u to an awesome 2005 article by historian Projit Mukharji. He explains well why claims over ancientness became more imp than any other characteristics (like therapeutic efficacy) for Ayurvedic publicists in the 1800s. academia.edu/761638/Bengali…