AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture
Jun 16, 2021 5 tweets 3 min read Read on X
This is concerning.

When controlling for age, body habitus, and other variables, people who had covid had sizes of key brain structures 4 standard deviations below average.

The hippocampal gyrus is responsible for memory, in part.
medrxiv.org/content/10.110… ImageImage
These changes were not found to be different whether one was hospitalized or not.

The one metric where size increased post covid- ventricle volume- is a good marker for loss of brain matter. This usually increases with age. ImageImage
And before people tell you this was unexpected- no. This was predictable. Furin cleavage sites confer neurotropism and this was my primary concern with the virus. With the knowledge it had a Sag, the situation appeared more dire. Downplayers are culpable. Image
I have been trying to convey this clear risk to people like Prasad and Munro who advocate to have kids in classrooms despite circulating neurotropic viruses with furin cleavage sites and superantigens. Image
Whether intentional or not, it seems to me all pathologically salient features of the virus like the Furin cleavage Site and SEB Superantigen were downplayed bc they went hand in hand with stoking the possibility of modifications a lá Gain of Function, whether true or not.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD

AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fitterhappierAJ

Jun 22
@Bryce_Nickels This is absolutely false because he made a “noble lie” and said the N 95s would not work for the public to the public in order for there to be greater supply to healthcare workers only. This backfired.
@Bryce_Nickels The ethical approach was the truth. This is a similar noble lie by omission that the WHO made when they refused to declare Covid as airborne in order for impoverished health systems to provide “adequate” PPE per their regulations according to WHO standards
@Bryce_Nickels The end result was workers in impoverished systems were being given “adequate “PPE for droplet transmission, and many of them died, including sadly many in New York City.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 6
When will H5N1 will go Human to Human?
Which is deadlier?
"The Covid pandemic has prepared me for an H5N1 pandemic"
Read 4 tweets
Mar 30
Wow looks like Marc is advocating Zero Covid, welcome Marc!

Mitigations like mask-wearing, clean air, and acknowledging the harm of covid infections

Well done!

This is an advancement from saying infections will maintain immunity, advocating for infection prevention instead Image
Image
Image
Image
Although it is a falsehood that vaccintions will not be needed

SARS Cov 2 is a Sarbecovirus and unlike the other common cold viruses. It has enhanced pathogenicity and immune evasion

Also, endemic sars cov 2 would INFECT the vulnerable, not protect them Image
I sure hope people didn't listen and abandon vaccinations after 1 infection because they thought reinfections would be like a common cold!
Read 5 tweets
Mar 29
I think the decrease in childrens performance following 2020 was due to the Neurological harm after they were coaxed into unsafe classrooms before vaccination

I think this will remain the dominant effect due to Covid's neurotropism on reinfection

theconversation.com/mounting-resea…
Some people are encouraged to obfuscate the risk of kids getting infected and they will continue to do so


Image
Image
16.1% of reinfected children got Long covid after reinfection compared to 12.1% with only 1 infection

More reinfected individuals had persistent anosmia, an indicator of neuroinflammation
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 26
I was a fellow at the National Cancer Institute for 4 years in immunotherapy of cancer

They paid for my PhD

I am happy to explain hypotheses for a potential SARS Cov 2 based increased risk of cancer:

1/4
There are multiple ways a virus can cause cancer directly & indirectly

One indirect way is by tempering immunity

The immune system surveils for wayward, cancerous, and precancerous cells, and kills them

SARS Cov 2 ages & dysregulates T cells
2/4
A second broad yet direct category is by Viral Oncogenes or mutagenesis

Some Viruses have proteins that can change expression or function of host genes & accelerate the formation of tumors by preventing cell death

Some viruses cause DNA errors to accumulate
3/4
Read 5 tweets
Jan 24
In 2021 on TWIV, Vincent Raccaniello said my claims of T cell exhaustion risk were "Twitter Science™"

In 2024 I am pleased to see T cell exhaustion is Science™, Nature Immunology™, and Nature Medicine™ Science
Raccaniello is arrogant enough to the extent to reject an accurate scientific hypothesis on twitter and his TWIV podcast to the detriment of the public, without knowing enough about the subject It was completely irresponsible

Are you feigning ignorance? It was a perjorative.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(