Oh look OPDS trying to tell attys & public defense providers the 4.5% budget cut is no biggie b/c they'll comply w/ #orleg requirements necessary to release withheld $100 million. Just like they've addressed the issues from the 6th Amendment Center report!
oregon.gov/opds/SiteAsset…
Oh wait, OPDS *hasn't* addressed the problems outlined in the Sixth Amendment Center Report - which came out in December of 2018:
opb.org/news/article/p…
Why does this matter? The budget for the Trial Criminal Division is $186,458,931 to start July 1, 2021.
OPDS ran out of $ for the month of June 2021, so attorneys, investigators, experts are not being paid for completed work, even as they continue to work & go to trial.
By reducing the budget & hitting the trial division hardest, chances are OPDS will run out of funds even sooner. This means qualified experienced attorneys will stop taking court appointed cases in a system that is already struggling to provide constitutionally adequate defense.
W/o qualified attorneys to take cases higher likelihood of wrongful convictions & inadequate assistance of counsel; which also costs the state more $.
The recent decision in PCR case McMullin v Amsberry is perfect example of why you need good attorneys:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Philips

Rachel Philips Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rachelbusygrl

16 Jun
🧵on how Assault II in Oregon is usually charged for perspective on the recent indictment of PPB ofc Budnick of misdemeanor Assault IV.
Media might to ask DA's office for comparable cases where a baton or rod or bat or other item was used & case was indicted as BM11 Assault II:
Assault II carries a mandatory 70 month prison sentence. If DA had charged Assault II that ofc wouldn't be able to negotiate for a dismissal via a civil compromise or setover-sentencing agreement, but with a misdemeanor Assault IV charge, a dismissal is a possible outcome.
Media should ask DAs office for comparable Assault II cases where events captured on video but no visible injuries, no hospital records but case still indicted as BM11. Media should ask DAs office for comparable Assault II cases that *weren't* captured on video & still indicted.
Read 5 tweets
12 Jun
Oregon Ways & Means voted to decrease funding for public defense by 4.5% today.

In 2018 the Sixth Amendment Center Report said Oregon's public defense system fails defendants & their lawyers. If #orleg wants criminal justice reform then it needs to properly fund public defense.
Oregon was the last state in the country to require unanimous jury verdicts in felony cases.

And the only reason we now have unanimous jury verdicts in Oregon is because of a United States Supreme Court case - Ramos v Louisiana - and not because of the Oregon Legislature.
It has not been a priority for #orleg to ensure that citizens facing the criminal justice system receive due process. Because if it were a priority, the legislature would have voted to change the law & require unanimous juries.
Funding public defense isn't a priority either.
Read 13 tweets
9 Jun
Oh Hi #orleg! I mentioned during my testimony on HB214 last month that good attorneys were leaving criminal defense. With OPDS being broke & the new proposed budget of even less $ for public defense - get ready for even more good attorneys to leave.
oregoncapitalinsider.com/news/state-pub…
Here's an article from 2018 pointing out the Sixth Amendment Center's report that Oregon's public defense system fails defendants & their lawyers.
Its 2021 & we're moving backwards.
#orleg
oregonlive.com/pacific-northw…
Here's the recent Oregon Court of Appeals opinion in McMullin v Amsberry - a PCR case - which #orleg should read in order to better understand why funding for experts & qualified attorneys is so important for public defense:
cdm17027.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collec…
Read 10 tweets
6 Dec 20
Looking at photos from a trip to NYC in 2019. Love the Central Park bench memorials & this was a favorite:
In Loving & Eternal Memory
Norma Juliet Wikler
Outraged and Outrageous Kentucky 1940 - Costa Rica 2002 Memorial plaque on green Central Park bench with brown leave
Looked up Norma Wikler & turns out she was exactly the kind of person I'd liked to have met.
"she was well known for her brilliant wit & sense of humor, her astounding energy, intellectual breadth, dramatic flair, & her often-zany sense of the absurd."
senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/inmemor…
Here's a published version of a speech she gave (in 1989) on gender bias in the court system:
nawj.org/uploads/pdf/co…
Read 10 tweets
5 Dec 20
This was a fun quiz & not a surprise I got Musical. BRB going to make a playlist w/ some songs I haven't listened to recently - like The Pointer Sisters - who will forever be associated w/ both Beverly Hills Cop & sneaking into clubs to dance in HS:
buzzfeed.com/evelinamedina/…
So much fun:
Love the silliness of music video's from the 80's:
Read 5 tweets
16 Jun 20
So apparently the Oregon legislature #orleg is seeking to eliminate the 180-Day Pretrial Detention Cutoff for people who have been arrested & held in jail & waiting for trial during COVID-19.
This is a bad idea, for the following reasons:
1) It’s contrary to the most recent OR Supreme Court Chief Justice Order, directing courts to “explore alternatives to current arrest and detention policies…to keep jail populations at a minimum” in the interest of public safety during the pandemic.
courts.oregon.gov/rules/ORAP/CJO…
2)It’s contrary to speedy trial right under Article 1, sec 10, OR Constitution, the prohibition against treating confined persons w/ unnecessary rigor under Article 1, sec 13 of OR Constitution, & the right to a speedy & public trial under the Sixth Amendment to U.S. Constitution
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(