More on the UK-Australia deal here 👇

/1
Again with the wording is exaggerated.

This is most likely self-certification by exporter or importer. Which is standard in recent trade deals.

You're not cutting any red tape with that cause there was no red tape to begin with. It was always going to be self-certification

/2 Image
Also, the problems with, or the burden of, of proving origin doesn't happen at the border.

So most of it is fairly generic at the moment but some interesting bits there. Like RVC 25% for cars.

/3 Image
A standard SME and Trade and Gender Equality chapters which sound great but in practice are more of a "let's try our best" type of commitment.

/4
Not much on TBTs though some "processes" and "ongoing" dialogues. Very standard customs chapter but a CMAA could be interesting.
Plus a lot of what was already mentioned in the last few days.
We'll have to wait for further details.

4/4

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Anna Jerzewska

Dr Anna Jerzewska Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnaJerzewska

15 Jun
Remember how before Brexit we were talking about driver shortages?

While it's not getting much coverage these days it's very much still a thing
Earlier this year a logistics provider mentioned that drivers were quitting and that shortages were unavoidable
And it's only going to get worse
Read 4 tweets
14 Jun
And then Art 6 👇

/2 Image
Notice that unfettered access is only for NI-GB movements.

For GB-NI it's "best endeavours to facilitate trade".

Trade facilitation means making border processes more efficient but not removing formalities and checks.

/3
Read 8 tweets
10 Jun
Both the UK and the EU have said that they would like to see a pragmatic solution to the SPS border checks issue in NI.

But it seems to me that they interpret "pragmatic" differently.

/1
For the UK it seems to be all about flexibility and finding a solution that's proportionate to the risk.

There is a bit of a "let's just get on with it" attitude and frustration with the EU's insistence on sticking to pre-defined terms and rules.

/2
The UK seems to struggle with the fact that the EU is not necessarily willing to go beyond existing frameworks and solutions.

/3
Read 6 tweets
9 Jun
There were always only 2 places to carry out SPS checks or any other formalities.

EU's suggestion that checks can take place between ROI and the rest of the EU shows how serious the EU is about protecting its market.

/1

Indeed ROI would be "paying the price" for ensuring there is no border between north and south.

I'm not sure what the tangible impact would be on trade between ROI/EU but any costs and delays would now be for the EU MS to absorb. Significant transfer of responsibility here.

/2
And difficult to imagine this being introduced without any further consequences for the UK as it would normalise UK's unwillingness to implement the Protocol. A document the UK:
✅negotiated,
✅signed and
✅promoted domestically as a massive success.

/3


.
Read 5 tweets
8 Jun
Turns out the supplementary customs declarations due this month (from this month onwards) are also a problem for the customs industry. Risk of a backlog.

/1 Image
Traders unprepared and often unaware of the obligations.

Brokers lack capacity, often don't communicate with traders due to lack of time. Or they wrongly assume that traders know what's required.

/2


theloadstar.com/threat-to-uk-c…
You need special authorisation to be able to submit these supplementary declarations and not every broker has one. The application process is complex.

/3
Read 6 tweets
7 Jun
Clear as day.

The UK sees the Protocol as a "huge compromise" and was expecting the EU to reciprocate.

The EU expected the UK to follow through on its commitments - logical consequences of this agreement.

/1
For example, the UK decided to apply the EU customs legislation, the UCC, in NI.

As a result, customs formalities outlined in the UCC apply to goods entering NI even from GB.

Simples!

/2
Seems like the UK was under the impression that the compromise it made was so big the EU won't possibly ask it to go through with it...

/3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(