Elizabeth Bruenig has defined her brand of public intellectualism as centered in ethical theory and yet she consistently shows the opposite of any moral commitment to her fellow citizens. 
Bruenig knows that when she QTs small accounts they will be subjected to bullying that will make this site unmanageable at best and psychologically distressing at worst. Yet she does it all the time. In this case, the bullying has been anti-semitic
https://twitter.com/_jack_fox_/status/1405542247714623515
I'll also add that wielding asymmetrical power to encourage bullying is a way to suppress criticism. Imagine if a professor encouraged the entire class to mock a student w/ a dissenting opinion. They might not feel comfortable dissenting again. It's bad intellectual behavior.
Finally, accusations of anti-semitism should be treated seriously. The accusations against Matt Bruenig have been made in good faith. People who defended him said he was trolling. If so, he was invoking anti-semitism to make people mad. This would also be worthy of criticism
If E Bruenig wants to defend her husband, she should do so in a thoughtful way. Joking about "anti-Swiss sentiment" is mocking allegations of antisemitism more generally &, yes, will probably encourage people to say antisemitic things, including making fun of Jews as "hysterical"
Yes, I don't buy the trolling excuse. Importantly, tho, even if it were "just trolling," it's still bad behavior. Why would you invoke bigotry in order to make people mad? If you do so, you could cause harm, including undermining the seriousness of bigotry
https://twitter.com/brcknowles/status/1405564524225347590
Would you ever think of making a joke about this vile history? A joke about the measuring of physical characteristics, an act that has been used in genocide & other acts of ethnic/racial persecution? It's not a good joke to make.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
