Now at #USCCB21, bishops will discuss "Called to the Joy of Love" pastoral frameowrk and proposed amendments to them.
We dont have amendments yet but are promised them shortle.
Bishops are invited to ask for consideration of proposed amendments that the committee recommends for consent motion approval or rejection.
Cupich wants to ask for a particular amendment to be given individual consideration. We don't know which one yet. USCCB will send ASAP
+Cupich:
I want to talk about the both amendments I proposed, on page 26.
No one else asks for separate consideration. But first consent agenda amendments are adopted.
+Cupich is asking for proposed amendment consideration by particular. We just got the amendments so I am trying to work out what it is he is asking. I promise to explain as soon as I can.
This is an important but not entirely conversation because we have just received the proposed amendments and are trying to sort the request out. We may need to write this up separately...
+Cupich essentially asked that some amendments he proposed include expanded references to AL, which pertain to the rules of discernment. Cordileone said he has no objection.
+Massa, aux of Brooklyn, is now asking about an amendment he proposed, and whether it was accepted.
It pertained in some way to interfaith marriages. +Massa is a long-time laborer in the field of ecumenism
+Cordileone seems to say that they were accepted.
Ok. Now the amendments are resolved. Now there is going to be discussion and debate on whether the whole document, Called to the Joy of Love, should be published. 2/3 of bishops must vote to approve it.
There is, to my surprise, no discussion.
I predicted there would be significant disagreement about this document. I was wrong about that.
Anyway, voting is open now, until 6pm, and the results will be posted tomorrow.
The bishops are now taking a 15 minute break. We'll be back.
There remains within some aspects of institutional Catholic culture a desire to be affirmed by the legacy legitimatizing institutions of American public life. The fantasy that if we obscure our weird little popish superstitions, the NY Times will think we're cool.
This is the residual gift of our immigrant past, and maybe the historical circumstances once made the aspiration of social normalcy understandable. But anyone can see the damage it has wrought to the Church, and it is time to stop caring that people will figure out who we are.
We do not let our yes be yes and our no be no, because too often we are trying to find some magical gnostic key to explaining the faith in a way that will cause no scandal. We are left causing scandal while failing to explain the faith.
In just a few minutes, day 3 of #USCCB21 will begin.
Stay tuned for live-tweets of the third day.
On the agenda today:
Results from voting on various issues, including the drafting of a document on the Eucharist, liturgical translations, the new pastoral framework on marriage, and the development of new pastoral documents on Native Americans and on youths.
The pandemic has however led to a greater appreciation of the Eucharist for some. But we worry that many Catholics may not come back to Mass. As St. Paul reminded the Corinthians:
Ok friends, we'll be returning to Day 2 #USCCB21 in just a moment.
First, discussion of a national framework for youth and young adults, presented by +Burns of Dallas.
And we are back.
+Gomez says there are some "questions" regarding the approval of amendments on "Called to the Joy of Love, and we'll discuss it again.
But for now +Burns discusses the development of a pastoral framework based upon Christus vivit, the post-synodal apostolic exhortation that came after the "youth synod."
In 15 minutes, Day 2 of #USCCB21 will begin. Today is a pretty full schedule of debate, and I'll be livetweeting it all right here. (Well, in a couple different threads, just to make it easier.)
Before we get started, just a reminder: I aim to give you a straight summary of what's going on, and I do that in real time. I'm not always 💯, and I am often paraphrasing. A quote is not a quote without "..."
If I make an editorial aside, I try to label it as such
*cont
And I urge you to take this as a real-time, on the fly, best-as-I-can summary of what's going. If I get something wrong, feel free to note it, but please know I'm not trying to spin, gloss, or editorialize here, I'm trying to capture it.
Hey everybody, the opening session of #USCCB21 is set to resume in just a minute.
Right now, kinda heavy jazz is playing in the youtube while we wait.
The meeting is about an hour behind schedule, which, for a meeting scheduled for 90 minutes, is kinda remarkable.
What happened? A virtual floor fight over a motion to allow in the agenda indefinite discussion of the "Eucharistic coherence" document, on the agenda for thursday.
Supporters of motion said that seeking consensus means it is important that every bishop be heard. Critics said it was a stall tactic or a "filibuster" of the Eucharistic coherence document.
Motion failed 59%-41%. Bps have told me they didn't think it would be that close.