NBC publishes its standard liberal commentary about an inflammatory topic (CRT and schools) dressed up as news. They send one of the reporters, @BrandyZadrozny, onto TV with Chris Hayes to discuss it. She says remarkably dumb and offensive things and gets criticized for it. Thus:
Male journalists like Ben invoke, so cynically, precepts of feminism in part to show what Good Allies they are but, more so, to place journalists off limits from criticism. That's their main goal. And they use a regressive view of women to do it (too fragile to be criticized).
Brandy's TV comments that attracted criticism were obnoxious and odious, whining how unfair it is that the uncredentialed masses are imposing "onerous" FOIA requests to learn what their kids are being taught. But if you criticize this, you're sexist:
Anyway, Ben Collins is a really really good Ally and I think that's clear. And while his view that his female journalistic colleagues are too fragile to be criticized seems misogynistic, manipulative and regressive to me, I suppose some appreciate his chivalrous defense.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is amazing. Last night I did a Fox segment on how the FBI and CIA have more power over the US corporate media than ever. It used to be clandestine but now they put their operatives right in the newsrooms. It's Operation Mockingbird, but not hidden:
One leading example I cited was that CNN -- when spending the week discussing questions about what the FBI knew in advance about 1/6 -- relied on. . . . long-time FBI officials deliver The Truth. That's because CNN is filled with FBI operatives. Watch:
Then this morning I see NBC News did exactly the same thing. Here's Brian Williams boasting about the fact that to debunk and delegitimize questions about the FBI, they turned to his "friend", NBC employee @FrankFigliuzzi1, long-time FBI Asst Director:
From Russiagate to online censorship to increased powers vested in the security state to battle "domestic extremism": it's amazing how the US Govt & DNC has succeeded in inducing *parts* of the left to cheer the exact weapons to be used against them if they get too threatening:
In March, I reported on the illegal involvement of the CIA in gathering data to create the new Homeland Security plan against domestic extremists. It was clear then that the targets are not just anti-authority groups on the right but also the left. Look:
In April, @lwoodhouse wrote a freelance article for my Substack -- "The Targets of Biden's War on 'Domestic Extremists' May Not Be Who You Think" -- on how they target anyone on the right *or left* against the ruling class. First: animal rights activists.
Now that the militaristic/neocon wing of the GOP is using their decades-old "soft-on-RUSSIA" attacks against Biden, will liberals finally be able to see why it's so ignorant and dangerous?
Last night, Tucker Carlson & @RichardHanania mocked and scorned the GOP's Biden-is-soft-on-Russia ad as the idiotic residue of the neocon/Bush/Cheney militarism still in the GOP. Is it possible to imagine an MSNBC or CNN host maligning a DNC ad like this?
Can anyone even imagine, say, Chris Hayes or Don Lemon going on air and saying: "We're about to show you a DNC attack ad on Mitch McConnell," and then bash it for being dishonest and dangerous? LOL. Exactly.
Democrats and their media allies couldn't believe Amy Coney Barrett has genuine judicial principles -- as opposed to corruptly abusing power based on her politics -- because that's how they reason. People without principles always assume others are plagued by the same disease.
That doesn't make Barrett's judicial philosophy correct. It's not one I share. But she has a judicial philosophy that she tries to apply in an apolitical way, making so many claims about her false:
“Confirming Amy Coney Barrett will be the end of the Affordable Care Act" - @AOC.
And please never forget one of the most repugnant moments of 2020: when @DrIbram, in the middle of ACB's confirmation, decided to announce that white parents who adopt non-white children are racist colonizers.
I'm a little unclear about this massive CNN/NBC/WPost freakout today about questions regarding FBI infiltration of the groups behind 1/6. DHS has been warning for 2 years at that they pose the greatest threat. Do people doubt that FBI infiltrated them & had informants in them?
The FBI had at least one informant in the group charged with the plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer. They constantly used informants/infiltrators to steer plots from the first War on Terror. Why are people so doubtful that they had informants in these groups?
I can't even count how many "terror plots" I reported on as part of the first War on Terror that were designed, driven and even funded by the FBI, but it was a lot. They'd instigate their own plots, then congratulate themselves for stopping them: