The detail shows that in only two cases (beef, sheepmeat) is the protection for 15 yrs, and even then the impact of a “cap” is not what it might seem at first sight. For rice, dairy products and sugar, the protection is for zero, five or eight years.
• the starting point (2021 tariffs and quotas)
• the size and expansion rate of the quotas
• how the in-quota tariff compares with the starting point
• what the out-of-quota or safeguard tariff is
Year 1 sees a jump in the tariff quota. For years 11-15 the 20% “safeguard” duty effectively reduces the out-of-quota duty to the present in-quota rate: 20%
Since imports are possible at 20%, how much protection will that be?
The present tariff quota is zero for in-quota imports. The same question remains: how much protection will a 20% out-of-quota duty provide in years 11-15?
It’s unclear whether the present tariff quota for raw cane sugar will be changed to cover other types of sugar. In any case the quota leaps in year 1, and is replaced completely by duty-free trade after 8 years
Short/medium grain rice is totally duty-free immediately
Long grain has a new permanent tariff quota of 1,000 tonnes
(Note this seems to be about protecting UK rice mills)
7/10
Dairy (cheese)
There is no UK cheese quota for Australia alone, only for all non-EU countries. Year 1 Australia gets quite a large tariff quota, growing for 5 years, then totally duty-free.
UPDATE: I’ve now uploaded the file I used to match product codes in the UK’s tariff quotas with product names. It was a complicated task, and no doubt there are still mistakes.
The blog post now includes the disclaimer buried at the bottom of the text.
“Many gaps remain but we are making progress,” @NOIweala told members on Tuesday Jun 7
“The success of this whole endeavour is in our hands. Let us deliver. The people outside are waiting for us and, believe it or not, I really think we will do it.”
Was it worth the time looking at the UK’s big deal with Indiana? The one the government hails as a “milestone” and the minister calls a “US trade deal”?
They wants us to take it seriously. So I did. Let’s say I did it so you don’t have to.
Indiana “will actively work towards” (not a commitment) treating UK suppliers the same as suppliers from other US states except those neighbouring Indiana.
“That’s the weirdest MFN clause I’ve ever seen,”—@Lorand_Bartels
“Agreement with Indiana marks milestone in UK’s trade with the US”—the UK government proclaims
Read on
It's a memorandum of understanding on what the UK and Indiana want to develop in their trade and economic relations. That stretches the meaning of “agreement” quite a lot
“The MoU creates a framework to remove barriers to trade and investment, paving the way for UK and Indianan businesses to invest, export, expand and create jobs.”
Remember: all major trade barriers are handled in Washington
It’s been clear for some time that WTO members are unlikely to agree on anything substantial on agriculture—despite declaring it a priority—when their ministers meet in Geneva Jun 12–15
Information from trade sources on a meeting last Thu May 19 reinforce that assessment🧵
1/11
The focus has changed in recent months—the Ukraine war has increased concerns about food security.
But the best binding decision that can be expected is to exempt the World Food Programme’s humanitarian purchases from export restrictions—still opposed by India & Tanzania.
2/11
Expect some non-binding/“best-endeavour” statement on food security, eg, the UK-led proposal⬇️, which draws on familiar themes of keeping supplies flowing, increasing transparency, minimising market disruption.
Chair @WillsSantiago briefed the media after a stock-taking meeting of the membership.
Sandwiched between plenaries Mon and Fri, were sessions in various formats. Wills said 30-40 delegations were involved in each of those sessions, total about 50.
WTO members on all sides were urged today to sort out their reservations over the proposed compromise, so that a deal on waiving some intellectual property protection for COVID-19 can be struck by the Jun 12-15 Ministerial Conference, trade sources say.
In an informal meeting of the WTO intellectual property (TRIPS) council, Director-General @NOIweala said WTO members have no option but to produce a result for the #MC12 Ministerial Conference, even if that means negotiating round the clock, the sources said.
2/14
Today's meeting was held to take stock of the first two days of real negotiations on the compromise text⬇️, on Mon&Wed, May 16&18. During those sessions, @NOIweala urged delegates to be prepared to compromise: "the perfect is the enemy of the good"