Where church A (or synagogue or mosque) says that Politician X is not welcome in A for publicly repudiating A's most fundamental doctrines - this is A protecting itself from public scandal & sin. X continues to hold the office they hold, albeit X's soul may be in grave jeopardy.
Christianity since it was in private homes & the Catacombs has preached against abortion. The earliest Christians rescued & adopted babies abandoned by the pagan Roman culture. Nothing has changed here since the times of Saints Peter & Paul. The deposit of Faith must be guarded.
Catholicism is tough. Life begins at conception and ends at natural death. As best you can, the faithful are to carry what will seem like heavy crosses through life, right to the end until God calls you home. But that is why we have solidarity - why we all have to help each other
This is also why the Church runs schools, hospitals, orphanages, etc & has done for two millenia. We as a Faith have not always done this (at all) perfectly but it was/is to promote community solidarity as part of Christian mission. Btw Secularism pokes this Bear at its peril
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It is not anti-Putin as anti-Russia as a traditional society. It is also why elements of the Right will admit in private that Russia, like the Visegrad 4, has an admirable refusal to salute whatever this week's flag is .....
Traditional Russia, generally, and Putin esp, is a hated target for liberalism - as it was in Tsarist times. Russian welcomes this hatred & will use it. See this magnifcent piece by @20committee from 2014 which noted & predicted all this
The strangest part of 2021 is western liberals who were never too sure about confronting the USSR are now certain that Putin's Russia is a mortal threat. The liberal tendency to the hyperbolic comes from religious outrage - that the Russians refuse to kneel before 'progress'
"Workers say they crave job security
Employers want reliable workforces:
The case for Serfdom"
Conservatives either solve the housing problem or socialism will do it for you. On taking power in Japan, General MacArthur broke up the great estates & literally gave land away to former tenants. He ended communism in Japan over night. I think of this all the time now.
Am simply astounded by media coverage of The Australian Club. Its membership appeal is not insignificant, ie club lunch is the food you could get reliably a century ago, eg roast beef etc, none of this poncy nouveau cuisine. Imagine membership worries women mean sushi, vegans etc
Napoleon said his Army marched on its stomach. In a less combative way, men eat in ways different from women. I suspect that the appeal of a specifically male club is less the chance to run into some guy who mattered 20-30 years ago & more lunch is roast beef & Yorkshire pudding
The dumbest part (of many dumb parts) of that SMH article above is one major reason men join a club is that they want to get away from the society outside it. They do not want esp the food & mores of 2021 which they can get outside it. Same way no man wants to drive a Prius.
History Nerds: am trying to watch the David Starkey series, "Monarchy", but in ep1 he basically pays off the Romans leaving Britain & then makes out the Anglo-Saxons (displacing the actual Britons) were basically metropolitan Whigs with aesthetic pretensions. Does it get better?
I do not think I have more eagerly awaited the Normans now than I have with David Starkey boosting the Anglo-Saxons....the revenge of the Franks is the revenge of Rome! Not a word about the Celts on any fringe.
It annoys me the Starkey rejects the Roman (correct) use of Britain - this weird anti-Roman/Norman sense - and then goes for "English" even when what he is describing is not at all English but Celts/Gaels etc.
There is nothing better for clearing your feed of 'woke vets' than discussing why ~20 years of 'eating soup with a knife' etc has not worked and was never going to work. If you will the ends, you will the means - or, if not, you should not waste lives & resources trying
UBL noted that people back 'the stronger horse' and clearly in Afghanistan, not just the Pashtu, but others, all knew that the West (via ISAF) was going to leave sooner or later & was the weaker horse. There was also the sheer absurdity of what was trying to be done there.
I may write a longer thread here. Basically unless you are willing to colonise (including by use of immense violence) a territory in Afghanistan's position, for a number of decades, and create a client culture as well as class, it is all pretty hopeless. It always was.
Growing up, in our local parish, was Lieutenant General Sir Thomas Daly KBE CB DSO, battalion commander in WW2 & Commonwealth Brigade commander in Korea. He was a daily Massgoer & Volunteer at Sydney's Mathew Talbot Hostel, looking after the homeless. He was always known as "Tom"
Edward Kenna was awarded the Victoria Cross for his extraordinary heroism in World War II. Post-war, he returned to Hamilton in Victoria where he worked for the local council and played football.
Captain Charles Hazlitt Upham won VC & Bar in WW2 & returned to a successful farming life in New Zealand. His name was in the local phone book and, so I was told, local children would drop by to meet the Uphams for afternoon tea & to ask him about the War for their school project