1. A story that sticks with me: The day insurrectionists stormed the Capitol—many invoking God—there *was* a counter-protest in DC.
It was a group of interfaith clergy, gathered in prayer around a BLM sign — a replacement for one destroyed by Proud Boys. religionnews.com/2021/01/06/as-…
2. DC's mayor dissuaded people from protesting in the city the day of the insurrection, and the interfaith demonstration — which was harassed by people in Trump gear — remains the only major counter-protest I'm aware of that day.
There's a reason for that.
3. The societal rift that wrenched apart the country in the Trump era is sometimes cast as a conflict between a certain form of "religion" & "secularism" — but that's an inadequate understanding of what transpired (and continues to this day).
There is a religious conflict here.
4. It's not as simple as two contrasting theologies within one religious group, though. It's bigger and more complicated than that.
I can't give this a full treatment in a Twitter thread, but some examples might help...
5. When Donald Trump first ran for president in 2016, he identified as a Presbyterian.
But many Presbyterians (PCUSA) were so unhappy with him they tried to kick him out — but they couldn't, bc Trump wasn't actually a member of a PC(USA) church. archive.thinkprogress.org/members-of-don…
6. Meanwhile, while some evangelicals flocked to his aided, there were prominent ones who did the opposite: chief among them was Russell Moore, a noteworthy Southern Baptist who Trump ended up *openly attacking* on Twitter. archive.thinkprogress.org/now-trump-is-j…
7. But perhaps most importantly of all: During Trump's campaign (which included him, you know, openly calling for a ban on Muslims entering the country) and after his election, hate incidents against religious minorities (Muslims, Jews, Sikhs, etc) spiked: archive.thinkprogress.org/thinkprogress-…
8. After his election, experts who follow hate groups said members found themselves emboldened.
Which helps explain why, after Trump won, a heavily immigrant church in Maryland found their church sign defaced with the words "Trump Nation. Whites Only." archive.thinkprogress.org/what-religious…
9. A pattern emerged: hate groups kept finding themselves in conflict with…faith leaders.
Remember that white supremacist torch rally in Charlottesville?
Guess who was across the street: a group of interfaith leaders gathered in prayer to protest them. religionnews.com/2020/04/17/how…
10. Faith groups that hadn't worked together forged new alliances in the Trump era. And they, too, became bolder: they staged protests against hate groups and Trumpism, arguing the two were connected.
11. The Religious Right—not to mention Trump—attempted to ignore them.
These religious groups didn't act alone (they worked alongside countless secular groups). But they just kept showing up. At airports to protest the travel ban. At Congress to defend the ACA. At the border.
12. Meanwhile, activism put them in conflict w/extremists—even if it predated the Trump era.
E.g., Tree of Life Synagogue shooter reportedly expressed hatred of Jews *and* immigrants, especially Jewish refugee group HIAS, which was connected to ToL. religionnews.com/2018/10/29/pit…
13. Fast forward to Dec 2020, when Trump supporters including Proud Boys descended on DC to protest Biden's election.
As night fell, Proud Boys lashed out: they marched through the streets destroying/burning BLM signs and liberal ensigns on…*churches.* religionnews.com/2020/12/13/pro…
14. The churches, of course, put them back up.
Some were destroyed again in the following weeks, but they replaced those, too, sometimes with public ceremonies.
15. So when crowds of Trump supporters arrived on Jan 6, perhaps it wasn't surprising at all that they had to walk past clergy praying around a Black Lives Matter sign, or a *giant* new BLM banner hanging from National City Christian Church.
By this point, it was to be expected.
16. And to circle back to the first point: Perhaps it's also not surprising that by the time Trump left office, he didn't identify as a Presbyterian anymore.
17. And perhaps it's not surprising that when Trump held up a Bible at St. John's, he did so only after it was cleared (for whatever reason) of demonstrators…including clergy sent by a bishop who oversees that church.
18. I bring all this up bc I think it's important to note how *constant* religion has been in our public debates in recent years, and how crucial a role it plays on all sides of our political rifts.
Understanding that helps understand how we got here, and where we're going.
19. If this past week is any indication, faith will continue to play a role in our politics for some time to come.
But pretending it's all a religion v. secularism debate isn't just factually false; It also misses a *far more interesting* religion conflict that refuses to abate.
20. Oh, and FTR: Obviously there were other forms of faith that backed Trump during his tenure, and still others that were avid participants in the insurrection.
But you’ve *probably* heard those stories by now. They’re well-covered.
These were some you might not know.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It was part of his 2020 campaign. They dedicated an entire section of the DNC to discussing his faith. He wrote about it in his book. They made ads in 2020 with him talking about meeting the pope (and nuns). washingtonpost.com/politics/biden…
Y'all he's been talking about his Catholicism throughout his political career it's a major part of his public persona and he's met with three popes GAH I GIVE UP religionnews.com/2020/11/07/pre…
WAIT I'M NOT DONE y'all he had Catholic religious references *in his victory speech* & *in his inauguration speech* and he began inauguration day *at Mass* and a Cardinal was *in his inaugural festivities* and he has a photo of Francis behind his desk and religionnews.com/2021/01/20/for…
In my entire career as a religion reporter, I have never seen more universal faith-based condemnation for a federal policy than the separation of immigrant families in 2018.
The USCCB condemned it too, but has only mustered sizable pushes for Communion denial regarding abortion.
(Technically USCCB *members* are the ones who muster said Communion denial campaigns and then bring them up at USCCB *gatherings*, not necessarily the USCCB *as an organization*, but I digress.)
Day 2 of the US Catholic bishops meeting—which will involve discussion of the Eucharist (and presumably whether it should be denied to politicians back abortion rights)—has begun.
The Eucharist convo likely isn't happening for a while, though, so sit tight. #USCCB21
Oh: In a convo on a Native American/Native Alaskan ministry statement, Bishop Lucia brings up examining the Doctrine of Discovery.
As I note in American Prophets, DoD has come up a lot recently, and Indigenous activists have asked Pope Francis to revoke it (he hasn't). #USCCB21
Bishop Tyson says he isn't convinced on Eucharist vote yet, asks: "To what extent is this discussion really just about making a point on abortion, to the exclusion of other issues?”
Rhoades says doc would also involve ppl who human traffic back, white supremacy, etc. #USCCB21
Didn't take long for Biden to show up at this USCCB meeting: Retired Bishop Michael Pfeifer asks to add a separate discussion of Biden's abortion initiatives, which he argues amount to "infanticide."
…But he's told he *can't* introduce a motion, bc he's retired. #USCCB21
There's now discussion of a proposal by Bishop Mitchell Rozanski of St. Louis, who asks for every bishop to be given unrestricted time to speak during the debate over the Eucharistic document. #USCCB21
Bishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, who has said Biden "shouldn't present himself for communion," speaks out against allowing unrestricted time for the debate, calling it a "stalling tactic."
1. Gonna share some @RNS content to help y'all prepare for Ecclesiological Meeting Week: The Southern Baptist Convention *and* the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops are gathering over the next few days, and both are fielding controversies and/or scandals as they begin.
2. First up: the SBC (the largest US Protestant denom), whose meeting has basically begun.
But in the days/months before, some things happened.
3. Actually, to back up a bit: It was back in Dec (i.e., a lifetime ago) when Pastor Charlie Dates explained in an @RNS editorial why his church was ending its affiliation of the SBC, accusing SBC leadership of "alienate(ing) Black and brown Christians." religionnews.com/2020/12/18/we-…
NEW: Me, @ClaireGiangrave & @alemolina were curious what Catholic bishops actually think about proposals to deny communion to Catholic pols—say, Biden—who back abortion rights.
An important thing to understand up front: When U.S. bishops meet next week, they aren't actually voting on this issue. They're voting on whether to draft a document *relating* to it.
But that doesn't mean the larger issue of communion denial isn't getting *a lot* of attention.
At the heart of the issue is "scandal," a world with a technical theological meaning within the Catholic Church.