As Ive mentioned before, I attended seminary classes which led me to understand what hypocrites many conservative religious types are. So let's talk about @USCCB and all the mortal sins they ignore as the Bishops go full MAGA.

You'd be surprised, given their obsessions, that../1
...there are far more Catholic-identified mortal sins than engaging in homosexual acts and having an abortion. Discrimination against LGBTQ people has no foundation in the Bible. Neither does being a politician who is guided by law rather than by the Pope. If the @USCBB.../2
...really believes that standing up for a nation's laws is a mortal sin, then bottom line, theyre saying no Catholic should be in government, because theyre required to let the Pope lead rather than the law.

Be that as it may. Other mortal sins that LOTS of MAGA types commit../3
...No Catholic mortal sin is worse or better than another. And remember: Biden isnt *having* or *performing* abortions, he's abiding by the law, which isnt by any definition a mortal sin. These are:
1. Defrauding workers of wages (James 5:4), as Trump has done 1000s of times.../4
...2. Taking advantage of the poor (Exodus 2:23)
3. Worship, veneration in false gods. (1 Corinthians 6:9-10) Lots of MAGA types fall into that.
4. Lying. (Matthew 5:33-34). How many Catholic GOPrs lie?
5. Masturbation. Gonna block anyone who masturbated from the Eucharist?.../5
...it just goes on & on. Pornography, avarice, lustful physical contact, presumption that you can save yourself without God, failing to go to church on Sunday. Their God King falls into every one of these categories, but they praise him from the pulpit.

These hypocrites are.../6
...literally trying to insert themselves between a person and God based solely on a single issue, one that does not even involve a mortal sin (this Catholic mortal sin, again, is *having* or *performing* an abortion, nothing else.) Meanwhile they literally ignore EVERY mortal../7
...sin performed by anyone. All forms of non-defensive killing - murder, euthanasia, execution - are mortal sins. If supporting a woman's right to choose is a mortal sin, imposing a death penalty or supporting it is too. But MAGA trumps actual religion.

I never thought.../8
...the @USCCB would throw themselves off the cliff like this, exposing their utter hypocrisy, their willingness to ignore the Pope, their willingness to proclaim themselves superior to God, let most mortal sins pass while creating a new one because of their MAGA politics.../9
..what the @USCBB is doing is an ABUSE of faith, making garbage up out of whole cloth (identifying as a mortal sin supporting the law, or even supporting others' choice to do something Catholics identify as a mortal sin) while ignoring scores of other ACTUAL Catholic mortal.../10
...sins, shows they are a political organization. A lot of Evangelical Protestantism has fallen down that rat hole & now American Catholic leadership has done the same. A lot of these political organizations are pushing standards that have no basis in the Bible or doctrine.../11
...so, the bottom line: As long as religious organizations twist the Bible and church doctrine to fit a political agenda, treat them like the political groups they are. Tax them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kurt Eichenwald

Kurt Eichenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kurteichenwald

20 Jun
The @USCCB is demonstrating it is useful to know that an Episcopalian is close to Catholicism. Many become whatever their parents were. Given the politicization of Catholicism, might be time to choose again. So, here are main differences between Catholicism & Episcopalianism…/1
…Episcopals are essentially both Catholic and Protestant. They are Catholic in the sense that they retained much of the liturgical and sacramental understanding of the early church; Protestant in the sense of being a church always open to reformation and renewal…/2
… biggest difference in liturgical belief is in communion. Through concept of transubstantiation, Catholics believe that in the Eucharist they are consuming the actual body and blood of Christ. Episcopals believe in the “real presence” of Christ’s body and blood, but don’t…3
Read 12 tweets
15 Jun
This is why @Prageru cant be relied upon for honest analysis. Example: They condemn Canadian system based on anecdote of someone waiting 3 months from diagnosis of prostate cancer to surgery in Canada. In USA, the *median* time for that diagnosis & ANY treatment is 77 days.../1
...if treatment is at an academic medical center, the median time between diagnosis and treatment initiation - called the TTI - is 87 days in the USA. In other words, the condemnation of the Canadian system by @prageru is citing something that is identical in the USA system.../2
...this is why these criticisms have to be analyzed. @prageru & their ilk always select things like time for treatment of prostate cancer and hip replacement to condemn Canadian system, hiding that the times are identical in the USA. Here's why: Prostate cancer is one of the.../3
Read 6 tweets
12 Jun
It's infuriating to watch conservatives continue to misrepresent/misunderstand basic scientific findings for the purpose of portraying Trump as a genius. Once again, they're misrepresenting the findings of a study on hydroxychloroquine, putting out disinformation that harms.../1
...those who actually need the drug - people with autoimmune diseases like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis -by creating a run on the drug with their disinformation. Nothing has *ever* even suggested that hydroxy is a prophylactic that prevents COVID, that it keeps infected.../2
...people who are not hospitalized from getting worse or that any possible benefits outweigh the risks except for very severe situations where doctors do not need an uneducated reality TV star to tell them how to treat. The first, since retracted, study showed that with.../3
Read 15 tweets
11 Jun
Other things that the Bible calls abominations, but that Biblical illiterates like @MaryBentley73 ignore:
Shellfish, mollusks, frogs, squid (including calamari)(Leviticus 11:12), grass-hoppers, locusts, crickets, chameleons, geckos, lizards, tortoises, snakes (Lev 11:41-42).../1
..approaching a menstruating woman with the intent of undressing her (Lev 18:19), sleeping with a woman married to someone else(Lev 18:20), ejaculating into a fire built to appease the god Molech (Lev 18:12), desiring gold or silver from graven images (Deut 7:25...see below).../2
...anyone who worshipped any but Hebrew God Yahweh (or Elohim sometimes, depending on section you read) (Deut 17:4), remarrying ex-wife after divorcing her (Deut 24:4), any molten image (see below again) anyone who shortchanges you on weight of sold product (Deut 24:14-16).../3
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
The minimum wage argument needs to be flipped to expose what opponents of raising it are saying. Which means we need the End Taxpayer Subsidy of Business Expenses Act.

The current minimum wage is so low it is poverty wages, meaning - for workers not to die in the street from../1
...hunger, their wages must be supplemented with government support - food stamps, etc. Businesses *could not survive* without those taxpayer subsidies, because they are not paying subsistence wages. They are schluffing off a huge portion of their labor costs onto taxpayers.../2
...which means *our* taxes are going to the bottom line of the Walmarts of the world. (A cut in expenses translates to pure profit) Thats why Walmart, McDonald's, etc have departments whose job is to teach employees.../3
Read 5 tweets
7 Jun
A solution to the assault on voting: @TheDemocrats @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems pass a bill to make Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act apply to every state in the country. This would largely bring in blue states.

Here's why: SCOTUS threw out Section 5 because it only applied../1
...to states with a history of voting discrimination, arguing that things have changed (Of course, they haven't. As soon as section 5 was thrown out, all of those states and counties rushed to pass laws restricting voting.) The issue in the Shelby case was that restricting.../2
...preclearance requirements only to states with a history of racist voting restrictions was unfair because it was based on 60 year old assessments of those states. Under the Shelby decision, there is no way to reimpose preclearance of voting laws (which would require states.../3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(