I think this column, which uses the death of Biden’s dog to muse on the death of Biden’s son, is in really bad taste. nationalreview.com/corner/the-sha…
The casual cruelty here is appalling. The man’s dog just died. What part of your galactic-level brain is telling you, ‘hey, it might be a good idea to use this tragedy to suggest that, for Biden, the *wrong son* got to live.”
I don’t know if Dan would put it this way, but the tweet/article strike me as suggesting that the tragedy of Biden losing his *good* dog while the *bad* one gets to live is kind of like the “tragedy” of how his good son died while the bad son is the one that got to keep going. 
This guy’s endorsement is actually confirmation of everything people have been saying about the piece.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
