many who follow me are on the right way, but from my perspective are working from wrong assumptions.

Can we stop talking about 'transmission' and 'variants' until this has been proven?

SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and the genome is around 50% or more computer simulated. Image
'Variants' are just the same disease with the same symptoms but then they find different RNA code and use even more interpretation and simulation to overlay this on the already simulated genome.
'Variants' are to scare us, i.e. Scariants.

Image
'Transmission' is also not proven.
They call it 'transmission' when people get the disease, were in proximity, and both test positive for only a small part of the RNA code (often only 1-2 target genes)
Why was it not the conditions the 2 people were in?

bitchute.com/video/U2xM8ZJ0…
I know couples that sleep together every night, where one tested positive for 'SARS-CoV-2' and the other didn't.

Two months later, it was the other way around.
Transmission?
Proof it. Show me a virus. Show me transmission.

Where is the proof that the RNA code was the CAUSE of the DISEASE?
Maybe the RNA code is the by-product of the disease?
How about that?
Proof me wrong.

Very well hidden video of Kary Mullis explaining this issue about HIV-AIDS.

It must be easy to proof me wrong, since more than 7 billion of people and the whole field of professionals of virologists still work on the assumptions of:
- virus
- variants
- transmission

So, please, help me and stop making me feel like an outsider.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PerpetualValue

PerpetualValue Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PerpetualValue

17 Jun
Important!
Weinstein, Kirsch, and the inventor of mRNA technology, Dr. Malone, discuss the Japanese Pfizer documents recently released by FOIA. mRNA-lipid nanoparticles spread throughout the body and concentrating in various organs including the brain, ovaries, and spleen.
If you want children, I think you really should await more safety data.
Here the original document surrounding this data which was obtained by a Freedom of Information Request by Canadian virologist Byram Bridle in Japan.

https://www dot naturalnews dot com/files/Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf
Read 12 tweets
1 Jun
we are now almost 1,5 year into this madness.

In my opinion there's enough evidence by now that non-pharmaceutical interventions don't really have effect. masks, lockdowns, excessive cleaning, etc.

Reducing human contact seems so logical,
but doesn't seem to work.
Time to rethink virology

There can be 2 (or more) reasons for that:
- Transmission is mostly by the very infectious (and thus with significant symptoms). They stay at home anyway.
- Terrain theory. We create the virus from within. They're exosomes with a corresponding RNA code
Virology is based on many assumptions.
Never has a virus been completely purely isolated w/o other genetic material.
Is virology as we know it actually based on the correct assumptions?
If it is, why don't these measures help?
Is human to human transmission actually proven?
Read 27 tweets
29 May
Elaboration Jaap van Dissel from @RIVM on question @WybrenvanHaga about the PCR test.

Let's evaluate the answer from @RIVM.
Testing was mostly done on only 1 target gene! The E-Gene.

RIVM says that this doesn't have an effect on the number of positives, which obviously is a lie. The test gets more strict when more (specific) target genes are added.

They only test on the non-specific E-Gene and then assume to have found SARS-CoV-2.

Read 12 tweets
6 May
"We are inviting the athletes and participating delegations of the upcoming Olympic and Paralympic Games to lead by example and accept the vaccine where and when possible."

investors.biontech.de/news-releases/… Image
"By taking the vaccine, they can send a powerful message that vaccination is not only about personal health, but also about solidarity and consideration of the wellbeing of others in their communities."

Solidarity and wellbeing of others?
Does it prevent infection and transmission?

There is currently no substantive data are available related to impact of Pfizer BioNTech vaccine on transmission or viral shedding.
In the meantime, we must maintain and strengthen public health measures

who.int/news-room/feat… Image
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
I’ll cover the subject of mRNA vaccines.

I warn you.

Do not read this twitter thread if you want to stay stuck in your belief that the vaccine is your golden ticket to pre-pandemic life!

Do read it if you want to be informed about what would be injected in your body.

1/
These vaccines are considered the holy grail of this pandemic. No one talks anymore about natural immunity. According to Bill Gates everyone needs to be injected in order to get back to normal.



2/
So, what are these vaccines and how do they work?
Well, first of all let's drop the definition of 'vaccine' and define them better as "experimental gene therapy".

No, that was a conspiracy, right?

3/
Read 102 tweets
1 Mar
Kind of remarkable how SB points out many of the flaws of the PCR test in this paper, yet say that the critique is 'Without any credible evidence'

Most of the tests in the UK&EU use only 1-2 target genes and run up to 45 cycles

How much has he been been paid for this paper?
Stephen Bustin, peer reviewer of Corman-Drosten:
- whilst the mere presence of viral RNA is not necessarily indicative of whether an individual can still transmit the virus to others
- it is also clear that higher viral load is associated with increased disease severity and mortality
- and, indeed, that viral load at admission independently predicts mortality
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(