Thread by @PerpetualValue

many who follow me are on the right way, but from my perspective are working from wrong assumptions.

Can we stop talking about 'transmission' and 'variants' until this has been proven?

SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and the genome is around 50% or more computer simulated.

'Variants' are just the same disease with the same symptoms but then they find different RNA code and use even more interpretation and simulation to overlay this on the already simulated genome.
'Variants' are to scare us, i.e. Scariants.

https://twitter.com/ChrisMasseyFOIs/status/1401959579622252544

'Transmission' is also not proven.
They call it 'transmission' when people get the disease, were in proximity, and both test positive for only a small part of the RNA code (often only 1-2 target genes)
Why was it not the conditions the 2 people were in?

bitchute.com/video/U2xM8ZJ0…

I know couples that sleep together every night, where one tested positive for 'SARS-CoV-2' and the other didn't.

Two months later, it was the other way around.
Transmission?
Proof it. Show me a virus. Show me transmission.

Where is the proof that the RNA code was the CAUSE of the DISEASE?
Maybe the RNA code is the by-product of the disease?
How about that?
Proof me wrong.

Very well hidden video of Kary Mullis explaining this issue about HIV-AIDS.

It must be easy to proof me wrong, since more than 7 billion of people and the whole field of professionals of virologists still work on the assumptions of:
- virus
- variants
- transmission

So, please, help me and stop making me feel like an outsider.