As anyone who fellows Glenn knows, it gets incredibly tiring keeping up with all his casual, constant lies/half-truths/dishonesty. In fact, even though it seems like I post about him constantly, I probably passed on tweeting out like 5-7 instances just this past week alone.
But permit me to share a perfect example of his casual dishonesty, since it's currently his header image.
So Glenn's fav. narrative is that the Dems just lovee the CIA/FBI and that explains all of their behavior. And he constantly posts this one chart (or at least this snippet)
He loves it so much that he even made it his header (which is extremely weird, but I guess not as weird as the picture of Liz Cheney that used to be there).
He posts it constantly as a 'trump card' for his world-view. Here's him a month ago stating these #s matter of factly.
But when you look closer at this data that he loves to cite, you notice, hey this is over 3 years old. Strange. There's no way that this is the most up to date data on this 'pivotal' narrative-supporting claim Glem constantly points to.
So I looked it up and surprise! Of course there is a more recent version of this pew survey. Still out of date but its the most recent they have polled this same question. And as you can see, the partisan gaps are much less stark (& in the case of the CIA, almost non-existent).
So why would Glem cite this one piece of out-of-date data, that confirms his priors (so much so that he made it his header image) and quote it matter-of-factly to own the libs, instead of the more up to date numbers that don't provide such an easy narrative?
It's a mystery.
TL;DR- @ggreenwald purposely uses old data to disingenuously support his narrative. Cites it constantly, including on Tucker but purposely ignores more accurate, up to date data that does not easily confirm his priors. As a real journalist does.
(sorry, thought this was included in the infographic but the 'up to date' data is from Sept 2019 vs. Glenn's constantly cited data which is from Feb. 2018)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So my one goal was to figure out how to get to this biosphere place. Of course no one could tell me where to get the bus. I went to the tourist information place & of course it was shuttered. Asked a young security guy at the building next door and he was like "she left already."
Basically I needed to find the collectivo (unofficial) bus stop and either no one knew or no one could communicate it to me.
I'm determined to figure this out. Just walking all throughout the city And what do I see: Escuela de Ingles.
So I'm like, if anyone can tell me...
So I knock on the door and this lady comes out and I'm like "hablas Ingles" and she says "a little." Well, that was a lie. She was the receptionist. But she did her best to try to explain to me in Spanish. But it wasn't landing.
If you follow Nate, you'll notice how in the rare times he comments on anything Trump does, it's done completely dispassionately; 'yes, Donald Trump seems to be covering up a report implicating himself with a notorious pedophile, but I doubt this will matter much."
Whereas with Biden, every time there was a sniff of a story or he flubbed a word, Nate was on it in minutes with something like, "Jesus Christ. Get this fucking dementia patient off stage. The Democrats will never be able to live this shame down!"
People ask, 'how could voters believe Dems have positions that they don't actually believe?' Well it's because the GOP bombarded them with lies about Dems and there's just not a great answer for such weaponized shamelessness. Truth just does not work.
The GOP (and its wealthy financial backers) have basically weaponized disinformation/lies to a completely unprecedent degree. And with the rise of technology are able to pump it out completely unchallenged (especially since social media outlets have completely given up).
So the NYT politics guys did a Reddit AMA several days ago. This was the top upvoted post. And then the extremely predictable (point proving) response.
And the predictably smug/condescending follow-up
Needless to say, they were heavily down-voted and deluged with (acurate) negative comments like these