As anyone who fellows Glenn knows, it gets incredibly tiring keeping up with all his casual, constant lies/half-truths/dishonesty. In fact, even though it seems like I post about him constantly, I probably passed on tweeting out like 5-7 instances just this past week alone.
But permit me to share a perfect example of his casual dishonesty, since it's currently his header image.
So Glenn's fav. narrative is that the Dems just lovee the CIA/FBI and that explains all of their behavior. And he constantly posts this one chart (or at least this snippet)
He loves it so much that he even made it his header (which is extremely weird, but I guess not as weird as the picture of Liz Cheney that used to be there).
He posts it constantly as a 'trump card' for his world-view. Here's him a month ago stating these #s matter of factly.
But when you look closer at this data that he loves to cite, you notice, hey this is over 3 years old. Strange. There's no way that this is the most up to date data on this 'pivotal' narrative-supporting claim Glem constantly points to.
So I looked it up and surprise! Of course there is a more recent version of this pew survey. Still out of date but its the most recent they have polled this same question. And as you can see, the partisan gaps are much less stark (& in the case of the CIA, almost non-existent).
So why would Glem cite this one piece of out-of-date data, that confirms his priors (so much so that he made it his header image) and quote it matter-of-factly to own the libs, instead of the more up to date numbers that don't provide such an easy narrative?
It's a mystery.
TL;DR- @ggreenwald purposely uses old data to disingenuously support his narrative. Cites it constantly, including on Tucker but purposely ignores more accurate, up to date data that does not easily confirm his priors. As a real journalist does.
(sorry, thought this was included in the infographic but the 'up to date' data is from Sept 2019 vs. Glenn's constantly cited data which is from Feb. 2018)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, it was incredibly meek and buried at the end of the tweet but he did it! It took a year and a half but it seems like has finally noticed that Trump is a demented old man (kind of).
The issue with Fetterman v Lamb was not an issue of 'progressive' ideology, it was a matter of ignoring numerous red flags that he was a very 'off' person not suited for congress, mainly b/c people fell in love with his aesthetic
One of the first major "red flags" about Fetterman that I called out years ago was his behavior wrt to the jogger incident.
He did something that was so self-evidently wrong but rather than apologize or take accountability, just pushed through & refused to admit to being wrong.
It should have been really easy to do, but he wouldn't do it.
Pretty obvious parallels to Platner's defense of the Nazi tattoo (a clear, insult-to-your intelligence lie) & his defense of his reddit posts ('i was an angry troop').
Anyway, this is all going to go fine. For sure!
The Left desperately wants to pretend they were all completely duped by him and he suddenly changed after the stroke, but the truth is that there were numerous red flags that were there if you wanted to see them. But his aesthetic!!
Would just like to note that back in Oct I pointedly asked @jonfavs what the Pod Bros relationship w/ Platner campaign was and he gave me a whole big, indignant," How DARE you, sir!" response.
And now, faced with another Nazi 'controversy' they rush out another softball intvw.
It strained credulity to believe that there was no actual relationship and 'just wanting to keep an open mind.' Now, it's just completely obvious that John was just straight up lying about it.
I mean, it was obvious then too, but now it's just comically obvious.
Yesterday Trump said, 'he didn't know what body part his MRI was, but NOT the brain'. Today Trump struggled to stay awake repeatedly during a cabinet meeting.
Naturally, Nate's last 14 political tweets are about BIDEN OLD (12 of which are about Neera Tanden).
That's dedication!
And yet ANOTHER long ass, whiny 'article' about Biden Old and how right he was. Nothing else going on. Nothing about pardons. Nothing about presidential age/cognitive abilities. Nothing. Just that pure 100% uncut Biden Old.
Never say that Nate doesn't have hobbies.
I was going to post snippets from the article but honestly it's just too pathetic. It's literally the same shit he has posted, i don't know....100 times?
Given Nate's total silence now, I can only assume that he thinks this is all normal and acceptable (way more normal than having a well-planned cabinet meeting). Nothing authoritarian going on now!
These guys all used to react to every single utterance. Every single flub. Every anonymous background quote Politico article. And now...all of them are just completely silent.