“CNN framed the report as a Both Sides one: Supporters see Ashli Babbitt as a patriot, while liberals see her as a terrorist. CNN then proceeded to **completely ignore the liberal perspective for the entire Babbitt report**”
“The CNN misfire was a classic example of what happens when journalists land sought-after interviews, in this case with members of Babbitt’s family, and then spin the story in their favor. They tell the tale just as the interview subjects would want it to be told.”
and yes, any report that quotes borderline traitor Rep. Paul Gosar as a serious person is a complete and total train wreck
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“It’s worse than Watergate because the White House abuse of power was purposely powered by the Justice Department. This would have been if U.S. Attorney General John Mitchell had helped plot the Watergate break-in”
“And it’s worse because since the scandal first broke last week, the Republican Party, as usual, has refused to acknowledge Trump’s radical ways and condemn the anti-democratic behavior.”
here’s’ show last wk’s Post article described Trump’s lies:
• “ceaseless attacks”
• “baseless theories”
• “unsubstantiated claims”
• “baseless claims”
• “baseless theories”
• “alleging without evidence”
• “falsehoods”
• “The accusations”
• “Claims”
“This is not the normal, instinctive language people use when telling the story about nonstop lies. This is the strained language reporters opt for when they want to avoid blunt adjectives to describe deeply disturbing Republican behavior that threatens democracy.”