Thread: Pentagon reiterates that their sole concern is withdrawal from #Afghanistan by early September.
Zero plans on contractual support, airport guards, "over-the-horizon" capabilities, or anything else. Notably, they no longer even mention the "peace process."
Asked about whether the US wants to prevent the collapse of the Afghan security forces and Kabul given lightening Taliban advances recently, Pentagon says it doesn't give a shit and is just trying to withdraw.
Pentagon: "We will complete the withdrawal of all US forces...with the exception of those...left to protect the diplomatic presence (LOL not happening)...and...it will be done before early September, as per [Biden's] orders. Those two things are constant and won't change."
Pentagon: Still no plans for additional "over-the-horizon" CT capabilities/regional basing.
"We already do have over-the-horizon capability when it comes to the counterterrorism threat...There are other facilities... in the Middle East that can be of some service."
🦄🌈
Pentagon: No concrete plans for any contractual support for Afghan air force or any other logistical support to security forces.
"Our support for the Afghan forces once the retrograde is complete will be largely financial..."
Pentagon reaffirms support for Afghan security forces will soon end as US forces withdraw:
"As the retrograde gets closer to completion, those capabilities will wane and will no longer be available to be used in that way."
Pressed on the issue of support to Afghan forces, Pentagon says its only calculation is what resources it needs to withdraw on schedule.
Asked again whether the stability of the government after withdrawal is a factor, Pentagon says nah:
"Two things are not changing: We will be out of Afghanistan + [bullshit about residual forces to protect embassy, which the Taliban has forbidden] by early September."
Pentagon: "Turkey agreed to take the lead role in terms of security at the airport. There are still details to be worked out. There's a lot more work to be done...We don't have final answers on that right now."
Take your time, guys. 15-25 days to full withdrawal. No biggie.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"According to a U.N. report seen by New Lines, at least two meetings between the Houthis and al-Shabab were held in July and September 2024." newlinesmag.com/spotlight/a-pa…
If India and Pakistan can avoid a nuclear exchange, anyone can, and North Korea, e.g., will nuke South Korea (and use biological and chemical weapons) in the event of conflict regardless of the South's possession of nukes.
Nukes aren't a magical answer, but if you've got the infrastructure, know-how, and money, unclear to me why you wouldn't at least become a nuclear threshold state as a theoretical deterrent to nuclear coercion/threats.
Rules are different for nuclear powers, and everybody knows it [Pakistan has been treated with kid gloves for decades despite its behaviour, partially for this reason].
Seems the "Georgian Legion" that basically kicked off what became NAFO was a scam, one I promoted and to which I donated and got my friends to donate significant amounts of money.
Al-Qaeda (Al-Shabaab) has reversed all Somali military gains in central Somalia over the last 2 years and is working with the IRGC (Houthis) to enhance capabilities.
"Ahmed said the Houthis...aim to establish a new front in the Indian Ocean where al-Shabaab can receive advanced missiles and drones. He said the Houthis have already sent three engineers to al-Shabaab...to help build sophisticated weapons and bombs."
.@jonathanchait: "They are treating apologias for Hamas as a factually or logically flawed application of left-wing ideals. I believe...that Hamas defenders are applying their own principles correctly. The problem is the principles themselves." nymag.com/intelligencer/…
@jonathanchait: "The illiberal left believes treating everybody equally...merely serves to maintain existing structures of power. It follows...that the legitimacy of a tactic can only be assessed with reference to whether it is being used by the oppressor or the oppressed."
@jonathanchait: '“Decolonization”...has a model of the world in which conflicts are analyzed as a struggle pitting settler-colonist-Europeans, who are evil, against native/indigenous/BIPOC people...[It] does not leave room to judge the morality of any methods.'